The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Ascon se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Ascon mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Ascon |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Ascon by Ascon and Mews PMS by Mews comes down to understanding what your hotel needs most. Both products aim to streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, support, and market presence. Ascon’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s not actively used or supported, whereas Mews boasts a thriving user base, recent feedback, and extensive integrations. Are you prepared to rely on a platform with proven user satisfaction?
Mews’s robust community and high review volume demonstrate its relevance and reliability for modern hoteliers. Ascon’s absence of reviews and zero score make it an unlikely contender for a decision today—unless you’re exploring unknown options.
Both products solve core property management issues—streamlining reservations, guest management, and operational workflows. However, Mews’s comprehensive feature set includes over 59 unique tools, from revenue management to automated housekeeping, while Ascon offers no listed features. Mews’s recent reviews and high ratings reflect ongoing development and user satisfaction, unlike Ascon, which has no recent reviews or ratings and appears inactive. Which platform will better support your hotel’s growth?
Ascon’s limited visibility and zero reviews make it hard to assess its reliability or support quality, whereas Mews’s active ecosystem and extensive reviews provide confidence. Are you comfortable choosing a system with no proven track record or recent user feedback?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with proven market presence, go with Mews. Its 758 reviews in the last six months, a 4.62/5 rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend demonstrate widespread satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially boutique and city hotels.
If your hotel requires a basic, perhaps niche solution with no recent updates or active community, Ascon might be an option—though its lack of reviews and ratings suggest otherwise. For most hotels, Mews’s proven track record and comprehensive ecosystem make it the clear choice.
Mews’s user rating for ease of use sits at an impressive 4.7/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, real-time updates, and straightforward onboarding. Customers highlight how quickly staff can adopt Mews, reducing training time and operational friction.
Ascon provides no current ratings or reviews, making it impossible to gauge usability or onboarding success. Given Mews’s high score and active feedback, it’s the safer bet for a hotel seeking a user-friendly platform.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online check-in, guest CRM, integrated CRS, mobile apps, and extensive automation tools. Its integrated marketplace with over 1,000 third-party apps offers unparalleled flexibility.
Ascon shows no listed features or integrations, leaving its capabilities unknown. The clear advantage goes to Mews, which provides a full suite of tools that support modern hotel operations and guest experience enhancements.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores are solid at 4.27/5, with recent reviews indicating prompt, helpful assistance and ongoing platform improvements. Customers mention that support is responsive, with a focus on quick issue resolution.
Ascon has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality or responsiveness. Given Mews’s active support community and recent positive feedback, it’s the safer choice for reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and POS systems. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connectivity with industry-standard solutions.
Ascon has zero verified integrations, greatly limiting its utility in a multi-platform environment. For hotels seeking flexibility and a broad tech ecosystem, Mews’s integrations are unmatched.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.12/10) reflect strong hotelier satisfaction across various property types, especially boutique hotels and independent properties. Its 4.62/5 rating and 93% recommendation rate underscore consistent positive experiences.
Ascon has no recent reviews, ratings, or hoteliers’ feedback available. Without current data, confidence in Ascon’s performance remains speculative.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing begins at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, and includes a comprehensive suite of features. Ascon provides no pricing information, making it impossible to evaluate its value or compare costs.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and extensive features, it offers a clear value proposition. With no data on Ascon’s costs, Mews’s offering appears more accessible and predictable.
Not ideal if your hotel values extensive automation, integrations, or proven support, as Ascon’s capabilities are unverified and no recent user feedback exists.
Not ideal if your property is very small, budget-focused, or in regions where Mews’s support isn’t yet established—though recent reviews suggest broad applicability.
Mews stands out as the leading option, with a proven track record, active community, and extensive feature set tailored for modern hospitality. Ascon’s lack of recent data and reviews make it a risky choice, especially when reliable support and proven functionality matter.
Choose Mews if your hotel values a scalable, flexible system backed by recent customer feedback, strong integrations, and ongoing innovation. Opt for Ascon only if you’re exploring very basic management tools without the need for support or proven market performance.
If your hotel needs a reliable, full-featured PMS that can grow with you, Mews is the clear winner. For minimal or experimental needs, Ascon offers no current evidence to justify a decision.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Ascon |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Ascon e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Ascon |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Ascon e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Ascon oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Ascon: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Ascon tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos