The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Assa Abloy se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Assa Abloy mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations and guest experiences. Both Assa Abloy and Mews aim to address operational inefficiencies, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Assa Abloy, a legacy brand, is virtually unreviewed and untested in the current PMS landscape, whereas Mews offers a modern, cloud-based platform with hundreds of recent reviews. Will you entrust your hotel to a largely untested system or opt for a proven solution with robust user feedback?
Assa Abloy, traditionally known for locks and access control, has entered the PMS space but with no reviews or clear user feedback, making it impossible to gauge real-world performance. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 recent reviews with a stellar overall rating of 4.62/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (93%). The recent reviews for Mews highlight its ease of use, extensive integrations, and operational automation, whereas Assa Abloy remains largely untested in this market segment.
While Assa Abloy’s offering might be rooted in physical security, its lack of recent user feedback leaves hoteliers uncertain about its effectiveness or adaptability. Mews’s proven track record demonstrates consistent customer satisfaction across diverse property types. Are you willing to gamble on an unproven legacy brand, or do you prefer a platform with validated success and ongoing innovation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich, cloud-based PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. It is especially suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, hostels, and chains looking for automation, real-time data, and guest-centric tools. Conversely, if your hotel primarily seeks a legacy, security-focused solution with a focus on physical access, Assa Abloy might seem appealing — but the lack of recent reviews and proven functionality makes this risky.
For hotels prioritizing ease of management, guest satisfaction, and operational scalability, Mews provides a clear advantage with its 59 unique features, extensive support, and continuous updates. Assa Abloy’s absence of review data and unclear feature set make it a less reliable choice for modern hotel management. Which platform aligns with your hotel’s growth and innovation goals?
Mews consistently receives high praise for its user-friendly interface, earning a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 98 recent reviews. Hotels describe it as intuitive, with a modern design that minimizes training time, and staff often note that they can operate the system with minimal onboarding. Assa Abloy, devoid of reviews, offers no comparable user feedback or usability ratings, leaving its ease of use highly uncertain.
Mews also scores well on onboarding, with many users highlighting smooth implementation and ongoing support. In contrast, Assa Abloy’s lack of recent feedback means you cannot gauge how easily your team would adopt its system. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides 59 integrations and features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, flexible booking engine, online check-in, automated reminders, and detailed reporting—features critical for modern hospitality. Assa Abloy offers no listed features or integrations, raising questions about its capabilities outside physical access control.
The extensive feature set of Mews supports a fully digital, guest-centric operation, while Assa Abloy’s offering appears limited to basic or physical security functions. For comprehensive operational management, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings include a 4.27/5 score based on recent reviews, with users praising their responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Many mention that support is a key factor in their positive experience, even when encountering minor bugs, which are typically addressed quickly.
Assa Abloy does not provide recent review data or specific support feedback, making it impossible to assess its support quality. Given Mews’s established reputation for customer service, it’s the safer choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 through its marketplace, with notable partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. These integrations cover revenue management, PMS, channel management, POS, guest communication, and more.
Assa Abloy has only one verified partner listed, which is insufficient for a modern hotel operation that relies on a connected tech ecosystem. For flexibility and scale, Mews stands far ahead. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews show an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, based on 98 reviews in the last six months. Hoteliers across segments—boutique, city center, hostel, and chain hotels—praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
Assa Abloy, lacking reviews, cannot be rated. Its unproven status in the hotel PMS market makes Mews the clear favorite for hoteliers seeking validated satisfaction and ongoing updates. Edge: Mews.
Assa Abloy’s pricing details are not publicly available, and there’s no indication of a trial or transparent fee structure. Mews charges a flat monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional costs listed.
The opaque pricing of Assa Abloy makes budgeting difficult, while Mews’s transparent model allows hotels to plan more effectively. Given the lack of data for Assa Abloy, Mews offers a clearer value proposition.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews offers a comprehensive, cloud-native PMS with broad integrations, proven user satisfaction, and continuous innovation. It supports operational agility and enhances guest experiences, making it ideal for the modern hotel.
Assa Abloy, largely untested in this space, might serve niche physical security needs but lacks the features, support, and user feedback to make it a reliable PMS choice. For scalable growth, automation, and a digital-first approach, Mews is the clear winner.
When to choose Mews:
When to consider Assa Abloy:
Conclusion:
For most hotels seeking a modern, reliable, and scalable PMS, Mews stands out as the smarter choice backed by recent reviews and extensive features. Assa Abloy remains unproven, and its lack of current user feedback makes it a risky gamble for your hotel’s future.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Assa Abloy |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Assa Abloy e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Assa Abloy |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Assa Abloy e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Assa Abloy oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Assa Abloy: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Assa Abloy tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos