The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Athena se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Athena mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Athena by Athena and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME are two options that aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ greatly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision hinges on which product aligns better with your property's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Athena offers an AI-driven revenue management approach but lacks recent reviews and active user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current performance. HotelTime PMS, with over 430 recent reviews and a 4.83/5 overall rating, provides a clearer picture of its effectiveness and customer satisfaction. Do you prioritize proven, widely adopted solutions or an emerging platform with innovative features?
Athena aims to provide an all-in-one AI-powered revenue management tool that automates complex pricing strategies and optimizes profitability. HotelTime PMS, on the other hand, addresses a broad scope of hotel operations with a comprehensive set of features, including reservations, billing, and integrations.
While Athena focuses primarily on revenue optimization through advanced algorithms, its lack of recent reviews and engagement suggests it may not be the best choice for hotels seeking immediate, proven results. Conversely, HotelTime’s recent reviews reveal strong user satisfaction for operational management, customer support, and extensive integrations. Could your hotel benefit more from a system with tangible, well-documented performance?
If your hotel needs an established, feature-rich platform capable of handling complex operations and integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. It suits properties of all sizes, from boutique hotels to resorts, and boasts over 430 recent reviews—indicating a mature, well-supported product.
If your team is looking for an AI-driven revenue management tool with innovative automation, Athena might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s difficult to verify real-world effectiveness. For most hoteliers, a proven, highly-rated solution like HotelTime PMS offers more immediate, reliable value.
HotelTime PMS’s user interface scores 4.66/5, and reviewers frequently praise its intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Support staff are highly responsive, with a 4.73/5 rating, and many users appreciate the detailed onboarding process that helps staff adapt quickly.
Athena, with a 0/5 ease-of-use score, offers no recent user feedback, but its focus on AI suggests a potentially steep learning curve and a lack of proven onboarding success. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS offers 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, POS, guest CRM, mobile check-in, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Athena, however, has no listed features or integrations, focusing solely on AI-based revenue optimization.
Given the breadth of features and integrations, HotelTime PMS provides a more comprehensive operational toolkit. Athena’s niche focus on AI revenue management might be valuable for large, revenue-driven properties but lacks the versatility needed for day-to-day management. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support is consistently rated 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, thorough onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Customers appreciate the support team’s responsiveness, often describing them as knowledgeable and helpful.
In contrast, Athena has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its current customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, HotelTime’s proven track record gives it a definitive edge. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS connects with 58 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, and third-party applications like Profitroom and STR. It offers extensive integration options, facilitating seamless data exchange across hotel functions.
Athena, with zero verified partners, provides no information on integrations, limiting its appeal for hotels requiring a flexible, interconnected tech stack. For scalability and operational flexibility, HotelTime PMS is the clear winner. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS enjoys a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 recent reviews, with properties across segments like resorts, boutique hotels, and city-center hotels expressing high satisfaction. Smaller and larger properties alike praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Athena, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, cannot be rated. Given the substantial recent reviews and high scores, HotelTime PMS has proven its value among a wide range of properties. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime PMS charges $600 per month with no setup fees or trials available. Athena does not list pricing details, making cost comparisons impossible.
The transparent pricing of HotelTime provides clarity for budgeting, while Athena’s undisclosed costs leave potential buyers uncertain about value and affordability.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that HotelTime PMS is an established, fully-featured platform trusted by over 650 properties across multiple countries, with a strong track record of support and integrations. Athena, while promising as an AI revenue management tool, currently lacks recent user feedback and proven operational capabilities.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS with extensive features and integrations, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice. Its recent 4.83/5 rating and nearly 430 reviews underscore its ability to meet diverse hotel needs effectively.
For properties focused solely on innovative revenue optimization and willing to take a chance on a less proven platform, Athena might appeal. But for most hoteliers, the proven track record of HotelTime PMS outweighs Athena’s AI promise at this stage.
In summary, go with HotelTime PMS if you want a trusted, all-in-one solution that’s actively evolving and well-supported. Consider Athena only if your operation is highly sophisticated, revenue-centric, and you’re prepared for a less tested platform.
This comparison is based on the latest available review data, product features, and market presence as of October 2023.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Athena |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Athena e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Athena e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Athena oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Athena: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Athena tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos