The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Athena se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Athena mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Athena |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when evaluating two leading options like Athena by Athena and Mews PMS by Mews. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in capabilities, user experience, and market presence. Your team needs a solution that not only solves your immediate operational challenges but also scales with your hotel’s growth.
Given the recent reviews and the sheer volume of user feedback, Mews PMS stands out as the more proven and well-supported platform. Are you ready to prioritize a system with extensive real-world validation?
Athena by Athena offers a broad AI-powered revenue management tool, designed to optimize pricing and profitability through advanced algorithms. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, its effectiveness and user satisfaction remain uncertain compared to Mews.
Mews PMS, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with a 4.62-star rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Its ease of use, customer support, and feature richness are consistently praised. Does your hotel need a system backed by recent, high-volume user feedback?
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly integrated PMS that supports automation, extensive third-party integrations, and a scalable cloud platform, go with Mews. Its broad feature set (over 59 unique functionalities) and proven track record make it ideal for mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups.
If your team is focused solely on revenue automation and AI-driven pricing without a need for extensive integrations or operational automation, Athena might seem appealing. But, with no recent reviews or active user base, it’s a riskier choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support and proven functionality.
Mews boasts a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Many hotel staff mention that even non-technical users find it simple to navigate, with quick setup and minimal training required.
Athena, however, has no recent review data or user feedback available, leaving its usability and onboarding experience uncertain. Without recent user validation, it’s difficult to recommend Athena as the easier system to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive set of over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management modules, booking engine, guest CRM, mobile check-in, integrated POS, automation tools, and advanced reporting. Many features that are essential for modern hotels are included, with continuous updates driven by user feedback.
Athena provides no documented features or third-party integrations, focusing mainly on AI-powered revenue management. Its lack of detailed functionality and recent feature rollout data makes it difficult to compare directly, but clearly, Mews has a more complete and versatile feature set.
Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high marks for customer support, with a 4.27/5 rating and recent reviews praising its quick responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Clients mention that the support team is helpful, with 24/7 availability and effective problem resolution.
Athena has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess support quality. Given Mews’s strong recent support reputation, it’s the safer choice for hotel teams that prioritize reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular channels, POS systems, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and extensive marketplace empower hotels to customize their tech ecosystem with over 1,000 available third-party apps.
Athena has no verified partners or integrations listed. For hotels that rely on a connected tech stack, Mews’s robust ecosystem provides a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent ratings reflect a 4.62/5 overall score from 758 reviews, with the most recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, support, and feature depth. Hotel segments such as boutique hotels, independents, and city-center properties all rate Mews highly, with many reviews emphasizing operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
Athena’s ratings are nonexistent, but the lack of recent reviews indicates minimal current user engagement. For hoteliers seeking validated, current user satisfaction, Mews dominates.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900 monthly as a base price, with no freemium or tiered pricing detailed. Athena’s pricing is not publicly available, making it difficult to compare value directly.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven ROI through customer feedback, it offers better cost clarity and perceived value. Athena’s unclear cost structure adds risk to your decision-making.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a well-established, highly-rated platform with a proven track record evidenced by over 750 recent reviews. Its comprehensive feature set, extensive integrations, and responsive support make it a safe choice for modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and growth.
Athena offers an AI-powered revenue management focus but lacks recent validation, user feedback, and a broad ecosystem. Its limited information and unproven market presence suggest it’s best suited for niche revenue optimization rather than full hotel management.
If you need a reliable, scalable PMS with current market validation, go with Mews. If your core concern is AI-driven pricing and you’re comfortable with untested platforms, Athena might be worth exploring—but be aware of the risks.
In conclusion, for most hotels today, Mews offers a more comprehensive, validated, and supported solution.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Athena |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Athena e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Athena |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Athena e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Athena oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Athena: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Athena tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos