The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Backing the packers se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Backing the packers mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations, guest experience, and revenue. When comparing Backing the packers and Mews PMS, it’s clear that the latter’s extensive feature set, user reviews, and market presence make it the more compelling choice. Both aim to streamline management, but only one has consistently proven its effectiveness across diverse hotel types and sizes.
Your decision hinges on what your hotel needs most: a flexible, scalable platform with proven support and integrations, or a less established system with limited reviews and features. Which will better serve your current and future operational goals?
Backing the packers is marketed as a customer feedback analysis platform that leverages AI to turn review data into insights. It ostensibly aims to improve customer satisfaction and operational decisions but offers no real-world user reviews or verified case studies, making its effectiveness difficult to validate.
In contrast, Mews PMS has over 750 verified reviews, with the majority recent—98 reviews within the last six months—indicating active, ongoing customer engagement. Mews’ overall rating of 4.62/5 and NPS score of 9.12/5 demonstrate high customer satisfaction, especially among hotelier users who emphasize its ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations.
While Backing the packers claims to analyze reviews with AI, it lacks the tangible, real-world hotel-specific features and proven track record that make Mews PMS a trusted operational tool. Do you want a platform backed by extensive user feedback and proven results or an untested AI review analysis tool?
If your hotel needs a robust, full-featured PMS that supports daily operations, revenue management, guest experience, and integrations, go with Mews. It’s proven to maximize efficiency in boutique, city-center, and larger hotels, with features like online check-in, PMS & POS integration, and a marketplace of over 1,000 third-party apps.
If you’re primarily looking for a platform to analyze customer reviews and gather insights for marketing or service improvements, Backing the packers might be relevant—though it currently lacks the hotel-specific features and proven operational impact that Mews provides.
For hoteliers aiming for operational excellence, scalability, and guest satisfaction, Mews clearly outperforms Backing the packers based on recent reviews and extensive market presence.
Mews scores an impressive 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by consistent positive feedback about its modern, intuitive UI and onboarding process. Users highlight how quickly new staff can learn the system, with some noting that onboarding takes around four days on average.
Backing the packers, with no reviews or established user feedback, offers no reliable data on usability. Its vague description of a "visual allure" doesn’t translate into confirmed ease of implementation or daily operation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 59 unique features tailored for hotel management—ranging from multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, online check-in, and automated housekeeping, to more advanced tools like digital registration, real-time reporting, and integrated payment solutions.
Backing the packers offers no verifiable features or integrations specific to hotel management, nor does it demonstrate any comprehensive toolset. Its value proposition appears limited to review analysis, not operational management.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with reviews praising its responsive, knowledgeable support team and smooth onboarding processes. Customers comment: “The support team sets new standards,” and “Mews is very user-friendly, making everything much easier.”
Backing the packers provides no review data or testimonials on customer support. Given the lack of evidence, we cannot assume it offers comparable service levels.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including critical tools like channel managers, payment processors, revenue management, and housekeeping modules. Its open API and marketplace enable customization and seamless connectivity across hotel systems.
Backing the packers has zero verified integrations, limiting its utility as an operational platform. It’s not a practical choice for hotels seeking comprehensive, connected management solutions.
Edge: Mews.
Mews has a 4.64/5 average review score from 679 hotelier reviews, with high marks from boutique, independent, and branded hotels. Recent reviews praise its simplicity, automation, and ability to boost operational efficiency—drivers of guest satisfaction and revenue.
Backing the packers has no verified reviews or ratings. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to evaluate its effectiveness or hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Mews.
Backing the packers does not list a pricing model, indicating it may be a niche or experimental product without transparent costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no freemium or tiered options listed, suggesting a premium, enterprise-level platform.
For hotels seeking predictable, value-driven pricing aligned with operational scale, Mews provides clarity, while Backing the packers’ costs remain unclear.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a cloud-native PMS designed to meet the demands of modern hotels, with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction. It excels in automating operations, enhancing guest experiences, and integrating with a broad ecosystem.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a scalable, reliable, and feature-rich management system that supports growth and operational excellence. Its recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate its effectiveness in diverse hotel environments.
Backing the packers offers a niche AI review analysis tool but lacks the operational features, integrations, and proven support that make Mews the smarter, more comprehensive choice for hotels. For long-term success, hotel managers should prioritize platforms with extensive hotel-specific capabilities and positive, recent user feedback.
In conclusion, if you’re ready to upgrade your property’s management and guest experience, Mews PMS is the clear choice, with a track record of satisfied hoteliers and ongoing innovation. The decision isn’t close: Mews’ recent reviews, broad features, and active support make it the platform to trust for your hotel’s future.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Backing the packers |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Backing the packers e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Backing the packers |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Backing the packers e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Backing the packers oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Backing the packers: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Backing the packers tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos