Backing the packers vs. Mews PMS: Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

Atualizado em May 9, 2026  ·  887 avaliacoes verificadas analisadas

TLDR

Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:

Backing the packers se destaca .

Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.

Veja a analise completa abaixo ↓

Como Backing the packers se Compara a Mews PMS?

Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.

HTScore
0
99
Probabilidade de Recomendar
0%
93%
Facilidade de Uso
0.0/5
4.7/5
Suporte ao Cliente
0.0/5
4.3/5
Custo-Beneficio
0.0/5
4.4/5
Preco Inicial Contact sales From $900/mo
Avaliacoes Verificadas 0 887

Quais Sao os Pros e Contras de Backing the packers vs Mews PMS?

Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Backing the packers mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.

Backing the packers Mews Mews
Pros
+ Ease of Use
+ Automation and Integrations
+ Customizability and Flexibility
+ Integração e suporte
Contras
Billing and Invoicing
Relatórios e análises
Multi-Property Management

Backing the packers vs Mews: Rankings por Segmento Hoteleiro

Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.

Por Tamanho do Hotel

Segmento Backing the packers Mews Mews
Pequeno (10-24 quartos) #3 329 avaliacoes
Medio (25-74 quartos) #1 397 avaliacoes
Grande (75-199 quartos) #3 45 avaliacoes
Extra Grande (200+ quartos) #3 49 avaliacoes

Por Tipo de Propriedade

Segmento Backing the packers Mews Mews
Boutique #1 483 avaliacoes
Luxo #5 220 avaliacoes
Rede / Cadeia #2 170 avaliacoes
Estadia Prolongada #1 130 avaliacoes

Por Regiao

Segmento Backing the packers Mews Mews
America do Norte #8 106 avaliacoes
Europa #1 660 avaliacoes
Asia-Pacifico #10 17 avaliacoes
Oriente Medio #28 8 avaliacoes

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel operations, guest experience, and revenue. When comparing Backing the packers and Mews PMS, it’s clear that the latter’s extensive feature set, user reviews, and market presence make it the more compelling choice. Both aim to streamline management, but only one has consistently proven its effectiveness across diverse hotel types and sizes.

Your decision hinges on what your hotel needs most: a flexible, scalable platform with proven support and integrations, or a less established system with limited reviews and features. Which will better serve your current and future operational goals?

Is Backing the packers or Mews PMS Better for Hotels?

Backing the packers is marketed as a customer feedback analysis platform that leverages AI to turn review data into insights. It ostensibly aims to improve customer satisfaction and operational decisions but offers no real-world user reviews or verified case studies, making its effectiveness difficult to validate.

In contrast, Mews PMS has over 750 verified reviews, with the majority recent—98 reviews within the last six months—indicating active, ongoing customer engagement. Mews’ overall rating of 4.62/5 and NPS score of 9.12/5 demonstrate high customer satisfaction, especially among hotelier users who emphasize its ease of use, automation, and extensive integrations.

While Backing the packers claims to analyze reviews with AI, it lacks the tangible, real-world hotel-specific features and proven track record that make Mews PMS a trusted operational tool. Do you want a platform backed by extensive user feedback and proven results or an untested AI review analysis tool?

Mews PMS vs Backing the packers: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a robust, full-featured PMS that supports daily operations, revenue management, guest experience, and integrations, go with Mews. It’s proven to maximize efficiency in boutique, city-center, and larger hotels, with features like online check-in, PMS & POS integration, and a marketplace of over 1,000 third-party apps.

If you’re primarily looking for a platform to analyze customer reviews and gather insights for marketing or service improvements, Backing the packers might be relevant—though it currently lacks the hotel-specific features and proven operational impact that Mews provides.

For hoteliers aiming for operational excellence, scalability, and guest satisfaction, Mews clearly outperforms Backing the packers based on recent reviews and extensive market presence.

Is Backing the packers or Mews PMS Easier to Use?

Mews scores an impressive 4.7/5 for ease of use, supported by consistent positive feedback about its modern, intuitive UI and onboarding process. Users highlight how quickly new staff can learn the system, with some noting that onboarding takes around four days on average.

Backing the packers, with no reviews or established user feedback, offers no reliable data on usability. Its vague description of a "visual allure" doesn’t translate into confirmed ease of implementation or daily operation.

Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Features: Backing the packers or Mews PMS?

Mews boasts over 59 unique features tailored for hotel management—ranging from multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, online check-in, and automated housekeeping, to more advanced tools like digital registration, real-time reporting, and integrated payment solutions.

Backing the packers offers no verifiable features or integrations specific to hotel management, nor does it demonstrate any comprehensive toolset. Its value proposition appears limited to review analysis, not operational management.

Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Backing the packers or Mews PMS?

Mews has a customer support rating of 4.27/5, with reviews praising its responsive, knowledgeable support team and smooth onboarding processes. Customers comment: “The support team sets new standards,” and “Mews is very user-friendly, making everything much easier.”

Backing the packers provides no review data or testimonials on customer support. Given the lack of evidence, we cannot assume it offers comparable service levels.

Edge: Mews.

Which Has More Integrations: Backing the packers or Mews PMS?

Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including critical tools like channel managers, payment processors, revenue management, and housekeeping modules. Its open API and marketplace enable customization and seamless connectivity across hotel systems.

Backing the packers has zero verified integrations, limiting its utility as an operational platform. It’s not a practical choice for hotels seeking comprehensive, connected management solutions.

Edge: Mews.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Backing the packers or Mews PMS?

Mews has a 4.64/5 average review score from 679 hotelier reviews, with high marks from boutique, independent, and branded hotels. Recent reviews praise its simplicity, automation, and ability to boost operational efficiency—drivers of guest satisfaction and revenue.

Backing the packers has no verified reviews or ratings. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to evaluate its effectiveness or hotel satisfaction.

Edge: Mews.

How Much Do Backing the packers and Mews PMS Cost?

Backing the packers does not list a pricing model, indicating it may be a niche or experimental product without transparent costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no freemium or tiered options listed, suggesting a premium, enterprise-level platform.

For hotels seeking predictable, value-driven pricing aligned with operational scale, Mews provides clarity, while Backing the packers’ costs remain unclear.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Backing the packers?

  • Hotels focusing on review sentiment analysis to optimize marketing and guest perception.
  • Teams seeking insights into customer feedback to inform service improvements.
  • Hotels with a strong emphasis on reputation management and online reviews.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel needs a comprehensive property management system.
  • You require features like reservations, billing, or guest communication.
  • Your operations span multiple properties needing centralized controls.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews PMS?

  • Boutique, city-center, and branded hotels seeking a full management platform.
  • Hotels aiming to automate check-in, billing, housekeeping, and guest communications.
  • Multi-property portfolios needing centralized rate and user management.
  • Hotels looking to expand their tech ecosystem with extensive third-party integrations.

Not ideal if:

  • You only need basic review monitoring or sentiment analysis.
  • Your hotel operates in a very niche segment with minimal tech requirements.
  • You’re not ready to invest in a scalable, feature-rich platform.

Mews vs Backing the packers: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Mews is a cloud-native PMS designed to meet the demands of modern hotels, with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction. It excels in automating operations, enhancing guest experiences, and integrating with a broad ecosystem.

Choose Mews if your hotel needs a scalable, reliable, and feature-rich management system that supports growth and operational excellence. Its recent reviews and high ratings demonstrate its effectiveness in diverse hotel environments.

Backing the packers offers a niche AI review analysis tool but lacks the operational features, integrations, and proven support that make Mews the smarter, more comprehensive choice for hotels. For long-term success, hotel managers should prioritize platforms with extensive hotel-specific capabilities and positive, recent user feedback.


In conclusion, if you’re ready to upgrade your property’s management and guest experience, Mews PMS is the clear choice, with a track record of satisfied hoteliers and ongoing innovation. The decision isn’t close: Mews’ recent reviews, broad features, and active support make it the platform to trust for your hotel’s future.

Quanto Custam Backing the packers e Mews PMS?

Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.

Backing the packers Mews Mews
Starting Price From $900/mo

Quais Funcionalidades Backing the packers Tem Que Mews PMS Nao Tem (e Vice-Versa)?

De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Backing the packers e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.

Funcionalidade Backing the packers Mews Mews
CRM convidado
Motor de reservas
Multi Moeda
Multilíngue
Módulo de gestão de receitas
Perfis de convidados

Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.

Resultados Reais: Backing the packers vs Mews por Objetivo de Negocio

Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.

Aumentar Receita e Reduzir Custos
Backing the packers

Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.

Mews Episode Tbilisi Pequeno
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
Aumentar Eficiencia Operacional
Backing the packers

Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.

Mews Aplend Apartments Medio
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
Melhorar a Experiencia do Hospede
Backing the packers

Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.

Mews Leven Manchester Pequeno
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Backing the packers vs Mews: Conclusao Final

Backing the packers
0.0/5 de 0 avaliacoes
0.0/5 facilidade de uso 0.0/5 suporte 0 integracoes
Ver Perfil
Mews
Mews
4.7/5 de 887 avaliacoes

O que os hoteleiros adoram

Ease of Use 89% positivo

Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.

Automation and Integrations 69% positivo

Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.

Customizability and Flexibility 69% positivo

Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.

Onde os hoteleiros criticam

Billing and Invoicing 77% negativo

Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.

Relatórios e análises 60% negativo

Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis ​​e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.

Capacidades exclusivas

Multilíngue Multi Moeda Módulo de gestão de receitas Motor de reservas CRM convidado
4.7/5 facilidade de uso 4.3/5 suporte 336 integracoes
Visitar Site

Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem

Avaliacao Geral Mews 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Facilidade de Uso Mews 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Suporte ao Cliente Mews 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
Custo-Beneficio Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
Integracao Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

Perguntas Frequentes Sobre Backing the packers vs Mews PMS

Backing the packers pode substituir Mews PMS?

Depende dos seus requisitos. Backing the packers e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Backing the packers oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.

Qual e melhor para hoteis pequenos ou independentes?

Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.

Backing the packers ou Mews PMS oferecem um plano gratuito?

Backing the packers: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.

Como o HTR Avalia e Classifica Backing the packers e Mews PMS?

O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Backing the packers tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.

Grupo de Criterios Peso O Que Mede
Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes

O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto?

Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso

O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao.

Ecossistema de Parceiros

O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa?

Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes

Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada.

Foco no Cliente

Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao?

Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil

Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades.

Alcance, Solidez e Recursos

Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa?

Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia

Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses.

As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →

Obtenha recomendações personalizadas de produtos

Consultor de recomendações de produtos

Ghostel icon

Vamos pesquisar as informações do seu hotel