The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 79 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Visioni S.R.L. se destaca .
Clock se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (5.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 79 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 79 |
Apos analisar 79 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Visioni S.R.L. mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Clock destacam ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, atendimento e suporte ao cliente. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Atendimento e suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e conectividade
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Personalização e Flexibilidade
▾
|
|
|
−
Dispositivos móveis e interface do usuário
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de Gestão Hoteleira para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #21 19 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #14 28 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #17 2 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #5 5 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #18 30 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #18 14 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #15 15 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #16 8 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #17 11 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #9 38 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #12 4 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #18 2 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Be MyGuest CRS and Clock HMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both products aim to streamline hotel management but differ markedly in scope, features, and user experience. Be MyGuest specializes in reservation and distribution management, while Clock offers a comprehensive hotel management suite with extensive operational tools.
Given their differing focus areas, your decision should reflect whether your hotel needs a reservation-centric platform or an all-in-one management system. Do you prioritize direct booking optimization or operational efficiency across multiple departments?
Both products aim to modernize hotel operations, but they do so with different core functionalities. Be MyGuest is a dedicated CRS designed to increase direct bookings and optimize distribution strategies through detailed data analysis, interfacing with RMS and Google Analytics. Conversely, Clock is a full-featured HMS that manages reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, housekeeping, and more, all within one platform.
While Be MyGuest’s focus is on improving your distribution channels and data insights, Clock emphasizes operational workflows and guest experience management. The decision hinges on whether your primary goal is boosting direct bookings or streamlining daily operations.
Another key contrast is the user base and regional presence. Be MyGuest's reviews are scarce, with little recent feedback, and no reviews in the last six months, indicating limited recent performance data. In contrast, Clock boasts 63 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, extensive integrations, and positive impact on revenue. Would you prefer a system with robust, recent feedback or one with a more niche, reservation-focused background?
Finally, the platforms differ significantly in scope: Be MyGuest is a centralized reservation system with interface capabilities with RMS, while Clock offers a broad management ecosystem, including POS, event booking, and guest portals. Does your hotel need a specialized reservation tool or a full suite of management features? How critical is recent user feedback to your decision?
Edge: Clock HMS.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one management system that covers reservations, rates, invoicing, guest messaging, and operations, Clock is the clear choice. It is especially suited for hotels looking to improve revenue through dynamic pricing and operational automation. Clock’s extensive feature set—49 features compared to none in Be MyGuest—makes it ideal for hotels that want a unified platform.
If, however, your focus is on enhancing distribution, analyzing website performance, and generating detailed reservation reports, Be MyGuest might appeal. Its core strength lies in managing reservations and interfaces with RMS platforms, which benefits hotels aiming to optimize their sales channels.
Considering recent reviews, Clock's features and user satisfaction ratings are stronger indicators of its suitability for your hotel. Be MyGuest’s limited recent feedback and lack of reviews make it less reliable as a decision-making tool today.
In summary, choose Clock if operational efficiency and revenue optimization are your priorities. Opt for Be MyGuest if distribution management and data analysis are your main concerns.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock earns a high ease-of-use rating of 4.73/5, with multiple reviews highlighting its straightforward interface, constant updates, and excellent support. Many users describe Clock as "easy to use" and commend its intuitive booking flow, with onboarding rated at 4.71/5. Users note that despite its extensive features, the system remains accessible, with support teams actively assisting during setup.
In contrast, Be MyGuest has a zero-rated usability score, and no recent reviews or feedback are available to assess its user experience. Its limited publicly available information and lack of recent user insights suggest it may not be as user-friendly or well-supported currently.
Given the recent and plentiful reviews, Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock offers a vast array of 49 features, including booking engine, multi-currency support, channel management, POS, guest feedback management, digital registration, online check-in/out, real-time reporting, and integrated CRS. These features directly support operational management, guest engagement, and revenue strategies.
Be MyGuest’s feature set appears limited to reservation management and reporting, with no distinct features listed beyond its core CRS functions. Its primary strength is interfacing with RMS and optimizing distribution, but it lacks the breadth of operational tools Clock provides.
Considering the feature count, Clock’s extensive capabilities give it a clear edge for hotels seeking a fully integrated management platform. Be MyGuest’s narrower scope may suffice only for reservation and distribution needs.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock’s support and onboarding ratings are strong at 4.78/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness and continuous improvements. Many users describe the support team as attentive, helpful, and vital during onboarding and troubleshooting. Recent reviews emphasize consistent support quality, which is critical for complex systems.
Be MyGuest, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it difficult to assess its customer service quality. The lack of recent feedback and low review count suggest limited support visibility, which could pose risks for new users.
Based on current data, Edge: Clock HMS.
Clock boasts 111 verified integrations, including popular partners like Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, Flexipass, Profitroom, RevControl, and several booking engines and channel managers. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across sales channels, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Be MyGuest has no listed verified partners, limiting its integration capabilities and potentially requiring manual data handling or additional development work. For hotels prioritizing connectivity with various platforms, Clock’s extensive partner network is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Clock HMS.
With 63 recent reviews, Clock receives an overall rating of 4.88/5, and a likelihood to recommend of 95%. Users from various segments—boutique hotels, city center properties, and independent hotels—rate it highly for ease of use, support, and features. Many reviews mention the positive revenue impact and efficient management.
In contrast, Be MyGuest has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Its lack of recent feedback suggests limited user engagement and less confidence in its ongoing performance.
Given the recent and high ratings, Clock clearly holds the higher hotelier approval.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Be MyGuest’s pricing information is unavailable, which can make budget planning difficult. Its lack of transparency suggests it might be customized or less accessible for smaller hotels or those seeking straightforward pricing.
Clock’s base price is $600 per month, with no additional connection fees or hidden costs. Its transparent pricing model appeals to hotels wanting predictable expenses, especially given its extensive feature set.
Considering the clarity and value offered, Clock presents a more straightforward investment for most hotels.
Edge: Clock HMS.
Not ideal if:
In essence, Be MyGuest suits hotels looking for a reservation-focused, distribution-enhancing solution without complex operational features.
Not ideal if:
Clock is ideal for hotels that want a broad, integrated approach to hotel management and revenue growth.
Clock HMS stands out as the more comprehensive, well-reviewed, and feature-rich platform suited for modern hotels seeking operational automation combined with revenue optimization. Its extensive integrations, high hotelier ratings, and recent reviews reinforce its reliability and versatility.
Be MyGuest CRS, while focused on reservations and distribution, lacks recent feedback and a broad feature set, making it less suitable for hotels needing a full management ecosystem. It may serve niche purposes but falls short for hotels aiming to streamline multiple departments.
If your hotel needs a full management system with proven user satisfaction, Clock HMS is the clear choice. Choose Be MyGuest if your priority is reservation and distribution control, and you are comfortable with limited recent user validation.
Os precos de Software de Gestão Hoteleira raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Be MyGuest CRS e Clock HMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gerente de canal | ||
| Inteligência de preços | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Ponto de venda | ||
| Sistema de Gestão de Propriedades |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 37 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 2 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
O Clock PMS+ oferece suporte ao cliente confiável, reconhecido pela assistência rápida e eficiente. Embora geralmente elogiado, há relatos de orientaç... O Clock PMS+ oferece suporte ao cliente confiável, reconhecido pela assistência rápida e eficiente. Embora geralmente elogiado, há relatos de orientações incorretas ocasionais e da necessidade de aconselhamento especializado. Os usuários sugerem melhorias na orientação intuitiva e no suporte para funcionalidades complexas.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o Clock PMS+ atenda às necessidades básicas de análise, muitos usuários manifestam o desejo por relatórios aprimorados e personalizáveis. Isso... Embora o Clock PMS+ atenda às necessidades básicas de análise, muitos usuários manifestam o desejo por relatórios aprimorados e personalizáveis. Isso inclui a integração com o Excel e o fornecimento de análises financeiras e métricas operacionais mais detalhadas. Alguns usuários consideram os relatórios existentes inadequados e complexos para a obtenção de insights abrangentes.
Os usuários manifestaram interesse em mais opções de personalização e configurações flexíveis para atender às necessidades específicas de cada hotel.... Os usuários manifestaram interesse em mais opções de personalização e configurações flexíveis para atender às necessidades específicas de cada hotel. Embora, em geral, estejam satisfeitos, alguns usuários expressaram o desejo de modificar relatórios e configurações de interface para melhor suportar operações dinâmicas e estratégias de marketing.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Be MyGuest CRS e Clock HMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Management Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Be MyGuest CRS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Clock HMS oferece 111. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Clock HMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Be MyGuest CRS: Nao. Clock HMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Management Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Visioni S.R.L. tem um HT Score de 0 e Clock tem 79. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos