The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Beddzle se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Beddzle mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Beddzle |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational success and guest satisfaction. While Beddzle by Beddzle claims to be an all-in-one OTA management platform, it lacks the robust features, extensive integration options, and user feedback necessary to support modern hotel operations. Mews PMS, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive, cloud-based platform backed by over 750 reviews, most recent within the last six months, with a high 4.62/5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Are you ready to rely on the more proven solution?
Beddzle focuses on OTA management, promising to unify reservations and streamline distribution. However, with zero reviews and no recent user feedback, its reputation and real-world effectiveness remain unverified. Mews, in contrast, has amassed over 750 reviews, with recent feedback praising its ease of use, extensive features, and seamless integrations. Its 4.62/5 overall rating and 93% recommendation rate demonstrate widespread trust among diverse hotel types.
The core difference lies in their focus: Beddzle appears to center solely on OTA relations, while Mews offers a full PMS solution that handles reservations, front desk, housekeeping, revenue management, and guest engagement. Are you seeking a narrow OTA tool or a complete hotel management platform? Given the extensive recent customer validation, Mews is clearly the stronger choice.
If your hotel needs a robust, scalable PMS capable of supporting multi-property management, automation, and guest experience enhancements, go with Mews. Its features include a booking engine, guest CRM, revenue management, integrated payments, and over 300 third-party integrations—perfect for mid-sized and large hotels. If, however, your focus is solely on OTA distribution without requiring a comprehensive management system, Beddzle might seem appealing—but with no recent reviews, its real-world performance is unproven.
For boutique hotels, resorts, and chains aiming to grow efficiently and deliver consistent guest experiences, Mews’ proven track record and expansive feature set make it the clear choice. If your hotel prioritizes operational control, data-driven insights, and guest engagement, Mews is the superior platform.
Mews has a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on nearly 100 recent reviews, with users describing its intuitive interface, modern design, and straightforward onboarding. Many praise its mobile-friendly platform, with staff adopting Mews quickly and seamlessly integrating it into daily routines. In contrast, Beddzle's usability is unverified—no reviews or ratings exist, leaving its ease of implementation and staff adoption uncertain.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automation tools, housekeeping modules, native apps, and extensive reporting. Beddzle offers no distinct features or integrations, focusing primarily on OTA management, with no advanced capabilities documented.
Given its wide array of functionalities designed for operational control and guest experience, Mews provides a more complete hotel management solution. Its ability to adapt across property types—luxury, boutique, hostels, and chains—sets it apart.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting responsive, knowledgeable, and proactive assistance during implementation and ongoing use. Many users note quick resolutions to bugs and support requests, especially given the platform’s frequent updates and improvements. Beddzle, with no reviews or support ratings available, offers no evidence of customer service quality or responsiveness.
Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 336 verified integrations, including channel managers, payment processors, POS systems, CRS, and revenue tools. Its open API and extensive marketplace support seamless connectivity with third-party software, allowing customization and operational flexibility. Beddzle has no verified integration partners or marketplace, limiting its ability to adapt to your existing tech ecosystem.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ recent reviews reflect high satisfaction across hotel segments, with a 4.64/5 average score from nearly 680 reviews, and a 4.91/5 from independent hotels alone. Boutique hotels, chains, and hostels praise its ease of use, automation, and support. Beddzle’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison, but the absence of recent feedback suggests it is not yet trusted or proven in the market.
Edge: Mews.
Beddzle does not publicly share pricing details, implying a custom quote or a possibly unestablished pricing model. Mews charges a starting fee of around $900/month, with no implementation fees, offering transparent, subscription-based pricing flexible for different hotel sizes. Given the proven value, Mews’ pricing aligns with its extensive feature set and support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a proven, feature-rich PMS that supports modern hospitality operations through automation, integrations, and guest engagement tools. It is highly rated, with recent reviews attesting to its ease of use, support, and adaptability, making it the ideal choice for hotels seeking growth and efficiency. Beddzle remains unverified and limited to OTA management, unsuitable for hotels that need a complete management system.
Choose Mews if your goal is operational excellence, guest satisfaction, and future-proofing your property. If your needs are purely distribution and your hotel is small with minimal management complexity, Beddzle might suffice—but beware of the lack of recent performance data. For most hotels aiming for scale and sophistication, Mews is the clear winner.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Beddzle |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Beddzle e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Beddzle |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Beddzle e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Beddzle oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Beddzle: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Beddzle tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos