The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 36 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Beekeeper se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile Access and SMS text messaging.
LIKE MAGIC se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Work Prioritization and File Library Support (images, documents and videos).
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 36 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 20 | 16 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Ferramentas de Colaboração da Equipe para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #17 1 avaliacoes | #7 7 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #14 8 avaliacoes | #16 5 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #12 5 avaliacoes | #19 2 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #11 4 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #16 8 avaliacoes | #17 5 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #14 11 avaliacoes | #24 2 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #12 9 avaliacoes | #25 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #19 1 avaliacoes | #8 8 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #10 18 avaliacoes | #33 0 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #19 1 avaliacoes | #6 15 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | #13 0 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio | #7 1 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right staff collaboration tool can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency, employee engagement, and guest satisfaction. Both Beekeeper and LIKE MAGIC aim to streamline communication and automation, but they do so in different ways and cater to varying hotel profiles.
Beekeeper functions as a comprehensive employee communication platform, focusing on internal engagement across all hierarchies and departments. LIKE MAGIC, in contrast, automates guest journey tasks, integrating operational systems for a seamless guest experience. Which of these solutions aligns better with your hotel's goals?
Are you seeking a robust internal communication hub for your staff, or a platform that automates guest interactions and operational workflows? The answer determines your ideal choice.
Beekeeper offers a broad communication infrastructure, supporting multilingual messaging, employee onboarding, recognition, and engagement analytics. Its focus is on uniting employees across shifts and departments, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing staff communication.
LIKE MAGIC, however, concentrates on automating the guest journey, integrating PMS, messaging, and access systems to reduce manual work. It’s best suited for hotels aiming to improve operational efficiency and deliver contactless guest experiences.
Given their design, Beekeeper's strengths lie in internal engagement, while LIKE MAGIC’s core value is automating guest-facing processes. Do you need to better connect your team or enhance your guest's digital experience?
If your hotel needs a versatile employee communication platform that enhances engagement across shifts and departments, Beekeeper is your best fit. It supports multilingual messaging, employee surveys, recognition, and detailed analytics, making it ideal for hotels with diverse staff or multiple locations.
Conversely, if your hotel requires automation of routine operational tasks, such as check-ins, messaging, or service requests, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. Its platform reduces staffing needs, increases digital guest engagement, and integrates directly with your PMS and access systems.
For hotels with a large, dispersed staff, or those seeking to boost internal morale, go with Beekeeper. If operational automation and guest self-service are your priorities, LIKE MAGIC is more suitable.
Beekeeper boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, praised for its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and mobile access. Reviewers highlight the platform’s social media-like model, which staff find engaging and simple to adopt.
LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews emphasizing its straightforward setup and automation features. Staff appreciate the platform's seamless integration with their existing systems, making daily operations less manual.
Given the recent reviews, LIKE MAGIC’s focus on automation makes it slightly easier to operate, especially for teams looking to implement quick, effective digital workflows. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Beekeeper offers 19 features, including employee onboarding, multilingual support, file management, and engagement analytics. Its extensive feature set supports comprehensive internal communication and staff management.
LIKE MAGIC provides 8 features, focusing on automation and task management such as real-time task tracking, case management, and self-service guest features. Its capabilities are tailored for operational automation rather than internal engagement.
If your hotel needs a broad suite of internal communication tools, Beekeeper’s richer feature set is advantageous. For automation-focused operations, LIKE MAGIC's targeted features are more powerful. Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews praising their quick, personal, and effective assistance. Hotel staff appreciate the proactive onboarding support and the availability of resources.
LIKE MAGIC’s support is rated at 4.88/5, with reviewers emphasizing their responsiveness and ongoing product evolution. Reviewers see LIKE MAGIC’s team as highly committed and helpful, particularly in customizing the platform.
Both platforms excel here, but Beekeeper’s longer market presence and larger customer base contribute to its slightly stronger support reputation. Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper integrates with 9 verified partners, including major players like Oracle Hospitality, Revinate, and Amadeus. Its integrations support a variety of HR, communication, and engagement tools.
LIKE MAGIC offers 10 verified integrations, including Mews, SALTO Systems, and Adyen, supporting PMS, access, and payment systems. Its focus is on operational automation, with integrations aligned to streamline workflows.
Both platforms are well-connected, but LIKE MAGIC’s slightly broader integration set, especially in automation and payment, makes it better suited for hotels seeking operational streamlining. Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Beekeeper has a higher overall rating of 4.85/5, based on 20 reviews, mostly from established hotels with longer usage histories. Hotels from diverse segments, especially branded and independent properties, rate it highly.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews show a perfect 5/5 rating from 16 users, with newer reviews emphasizing rapid implementation and guest satisfaction improvements. Its focus on automation resonates strongly with forward-thinking hotels.
While Beekeeper's broader user base and longer track record make it more proven, LIKE MAGIC’s recent momentum and high ratings indicate a very strong user satisfaction level. Edge: Beekeeper.
Beekeeper does not publicly list pricing, indicating a tailored quote based on your hotel’s size and needs. It likely involves an implementation fee and a per-user or per-device subscription.
LIKE MAGIC charges a base price of $1,100, with no public details on ongoing costs, but appears to be a straightforward subscription model. Its clear pricing makes budgeting easier.
If transparency and predictable costs matter, LIKE MAGIC’s pricing clarity is advantageous. For larger, customized implementations, Beekeeper’s flexible pricing structure may be better suited.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs guest automation or operational workflows.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if your hotel’s main goal is internal staff engagement or long-term internal communication strategies.
Beekeeper is a comprehensive internal communication platform with a rich feature set, ideal for hotels prioritizing staff engagement, culture, and internal workflows. It’s best suited for larger or multi-location hotels that want to unify their team communications and build a connected workplace.
LIKE MAGIC is a streamlined automation platform that reduces manual work and enhances the guest experience through integrated, contactless operations. It excels in properties seeking operational efficiency, automation, and digital guest engagement.
If your hotel values internal communication and employee morale, go with Beekeeper. For hotels aiming to enhance operational automation, reduce staffing, and deliver seamless guest services, LIKE MAGIC is the more appropriate choice.
The choice ultimately hinges on your hotel’s primary needs: internal staff engagement or operational automation. Beekeeper’s proven track record and extensive features make it a safe, versatile bet, especially for larger properties.
LIKE MAGIC’s recent reviews and perfect ease-of-use rating suggest it’s a rising star for hotels focusing on digitizing guest interactions and automating workflows. As both platforms continue to evolve, your decision should align with your hotel’s strategic priorities: people or processes.
Os precos de Ferramentas de Colaboração da Equipe raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
Beekeeper
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,100/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) e LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) compartilham 4 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
Beekeeper
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acesso móvel | ||
| Acompanhamento de tarefas em tempo real | ||
| Check-outs tardios | ||
| Comunicação do Funcionário | ||
| Diário de bordo virtual | ||
| Gestão de caso | ||
| Integração de funcionários | ||
| Personalização e segurança | ||
| Priorização de trabalho | ||
| Suporte e recursos ao cliente | ||
| Suporte à biblioteca de arquivos (imagens, documentos e vídeos) | ||
| mensagens de texto SMS |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 15 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 4 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Beekeeper
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
Beekeeper
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) e LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Staff Collaboration Tools, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Beekeeper (Digital Workspace) oferece 9 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) oferece 10. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App) lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Beekeeper (Digital Workspace): Nao. LIKE MAGIC (Staff App): Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Staff Collaboration Tools oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Beekeeper tem um HT Score de 0 e LIKE MAGIC tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos