The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Vision S.r.l. se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Vision S.r.l. mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Vision S.r.l. |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Vision S.r.l. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Vision S.r.l. |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Vision S.r.l. |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between BeMyGuest CRS by Vision S.r.l. and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both aim to streamline operations, but they serve distinctly different functions—BeMyGuest primarily focuses on tour and activity management, while Mews offers a comprehensive property management system. Given the data, Mews’s recent reviews and higher ratings position it as the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Are you seeking a broad, adaptable PMS capable of managing multiple properties and guest experiences, or a niche solution tailored to tour operators? Your decision should reflect your core operational priorities.
BeMyGuest CRS is designed for agencies and tour operators managing a variety of activities and inventory, offering real-time updates and distribution channel integrations. However, its limited review count and lack of recent feedback make it less dependable as a PMS for hotel management.
Mews PMS, with over 750 reviews and a recent review count of 98 in the last six months, provides a well-established, highly-rated platform that covers reservations, billing, guest communication, and integrations. Its 4.62 out of 5-star rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend reflect robust user confidence.
Do you need a specialized CRS for activities, or a full-scale PMS that supports daily hotel operations? This core difference is critical in your decision.
If your hotel requires a modern, scalable PMS with extensive integrations, automation, and a worldwide presence, go with Mews. Its platform is trusted by a diverse range of properties, from boutique hotels to large chains, with recent reviews emphasizing its ease of use and support.
Choose BeMyGuest CRS if your primary focus is on managing tours, activities, and distribution channels for travel operators, not core hotel operations. Its niche focus offers specific tools for activity inventory, customer bookings, and real-time updates but lacks the broad hotel management features Mews provides.
Is your priority operational efficiency or activity distribution? If efficiency and scalability matter, Mews is the safer pick.
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Support experiences are rated 4.27, with many users highlighting quick onboarding and responsive customer service.
BeMyGuest, with no recent reviews or ratings available, offers limited insight into its usability. The absence of recent user feedback suggests a less reliable or less evolved user experience compared to Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, channel manager, integrated payments, digital check-in, and comprehensive reporting—covering everything needed for full hotel operations. It also supports automation, real-time updates, and a vast partner marketplace.
BeMyGuest CRS, in contrast, has no verified features listed, indicating a very narrow scope focused on activity and tour management rather than hotel operations.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support, rated 4.27/5, is frequently praised for responsiveness and helpful onboarding, leading to a more confident user experience. Many recent reviews highlight how support teams resolve issues swiftly, boosting overall satisfaction.
With no recent data or reviews for BeMyGuest CRS, it’s impossible to assess support quality. The lack of feedback diminishes trust in their customer service.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including major partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, along with over 1,000 marketplace apps. Its open API and extensive partner network enable extensive customization.
BeMyGuest CRS has no verified integration data, indicating a limited or unspecified partner ecosystem. This restricts its ability to connect with other hotel systems or third-party tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 overall rating, with a 93% recommendation rate, especially among boutique, city center, and independent hotels. Hotels of all sizes, from small inns to chains, appreciate its flexibility and support.
BeMyGuest, lacking recent reviews and ratings, cannot be reliably compared. Its absence of recent feedback suggests less confidence among current users.
Edge: Mews.
BeMyGuest CRS’s pricing is not explicitly listed, making direct comparisons impossible. Its niche focus may imply a lower or different pricing model aligned with activity management.
Mews charges a flat $900 monthly fee, with no free tier or trial available. While this might seem high, the extensive features and integrations justify the cost for hotels seeking a full PMS.
If cost transparency is vital, Mews’s known pricing allows better budget planning.
BeMyGuest CRS is tailored for activity and experience providers, not for hotels seeking broad operational tools.
Mews’s versatility makes it suitable for diverse hotel types aiming for operational excellence.
Mews offers a full, integrated PMS with a proven track record, extensive features, and a strong support ecosystem—making it a reliable choice for hotel operators. BeMyGuest CRS excels in activity and experience management but lacks the comprehensive tools, recent reviews, and scalability needed for large or multi-property hotels.
If your hotel needs a robust, widely trusted system capable of managing reservations, billing, guest communications, and integrations, choose Mews. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its suitability for modern hospitality.
Opt for BeMyGuest CRS only if your primary goal is activity or tour management, and hotel operations are secondary. Its limited scope and lack of recent feedback make it a less versatile choice for most hoteliers.
By focusing on recent, high-quality reviews and comprehensive features, Mews stands out as the clear choice for hotels seeking a dependable, scalable property management system.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Vision S.r.l. |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, BeMyGuest CRS e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Vision S.r.l. |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. BeMyGuest CRS e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. BeMyGuest CRS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
BeMyGuest CRS: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Vision S.r.l. tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos