The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES and Mews PMS boils down to your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations but serve very different market segments and operational scales. BOCS is a comprehensive property management system tailored for real estate firms and multi-property portfolios, whereas Mews is a cloud-based hotel management platform praised for its ease of use and flexible integrations. Are you seeking a system optimized for property management or hospitality operations?
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES provides an extensive suite of tools designed for property and asset management, especially in real estate and multi-property portfolios. Its strengths are in managing leasing, tenant interactions, and financial transactions, supporting complex property operations. Conversely, Mews is built specifically for hotels, focusing on guest experiences, reservations, and operational automation, with a user-friendly interface. Do your hotel’s priorities lean towards property management or guest-centric hospitality?
The key divergence is that BOCS’s system offers comprehensive property oversight, while Mews emphasizes guest journey automation and operational efficiency. Mews's recent review count (758 reviews) and high score (4.62/5) demonstrate a broad, current user base and strong satisfaction. BOCS’s ratings, however, are not available, indicating limited or no recent feedback. Would your team benefit more from managing properties or enhancing guest experiences?
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-native platform capable of automating guest interactions, reservations, and revenue management, Mews is the clear choice. It’s suitable for boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties seeking scale, with a 93% likelihood to recommend and highly positive recent reviews. If your hotel or management company requires a system for extensive property portfolios, tenant management, and complex financial workflows, BOCS’s system might be more aligned—though its current user feedback is nonexistent.
For independent hotels and properties prioritizing guest experience, automation, and integrations, Mews’s 59 unique features, over 336 integrations, and high user ratings make it the superior option. BOCS’s niche focus on property management for real estate is less relevant for hotel operations. Which operational model aligns with your hotel’s growth strategy?
Mews’s 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating and recent reviews emphasize its intuitive, modern interface, and straightforward onboarding process—hotels report quick setup and staff adoption. Many users highlight the platform’s user-friendly design, with reviews praising its ease of navigation and minimal training requirements. BOCS, however, has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to assess current user experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive array of features tailored to hospitality, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, online booking, guest CRM, mobile check-in, digital registration, automated housekeeping, and integrations with over 336 third-party systems. It’s designed to handle everything from guest communication to revenue management, with 59 unique features. BOCS’s system, by contrast, provides zero listed features, indicating it’s more of a broad property management solution without specific hospitality tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts a 4.27/5 support rating, with recent reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and dedicated onboarding. Users describe their support as proactive and efficient, especially during implementation. BOCS’s support experience, however, is not documented publicly, with no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness or quality.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ecosystem includes over 336 verified integrations, connecting with channel managers, revenue tools, POS systems, and more. It supports a broad array of third-party partners, allowing hotels to customize their tech stack. BOCS does not list any integrations, indicating limited connectivity options beyond its core functionalities.
Edge: Mews.
With 758 recent reviews, Mews has a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend, reflecting widespread, current satisfaction across various hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and city hotels. BOCS’s ratings are unavailable, but the lack of recent reviews suggests less user engagement or fewer hotel clients.
Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or setup costs. BOCS’s pricing details are not publicly available; it appears to operate on a bespoke or enterprise model, making direct comparisons difficult. For budget-conscious hotels, Mews’s transparent pricing offers clarity, whereas BOCS may require direct vendor negotiation.
Mews is a highly-rated, user-friendly platform suited for modern hotels looking to automate operations, improve guest satisfaction, and expand integrations. Its extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it the clear winner for most hoteliers aiming for operational excellence.
BOCS, with its specialized focus on property and asset management for real estate, is less relevant for typical hotel operations. Its lack of recent feedback and features suggests it’s better suited for property managers or real estate firms rather than hotel teams.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs a flexible, scalable, guest-centric system. Opt for BOCS if your primary goal is managing large property portfolios and tenant relations, though it may require more custom development and lacks recent user validation.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. BOCS GROUP OF COMPANIES tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos