The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Bokun se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Bokun mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Bokun |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Selecting a property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Bokun by Bokun and Mews PMS by Mews both aim to streamline operations but serve markedly different needs and hotel types. Which one aligns better with your specific requirements?
Bokun primarily targets tour operators, activity providers, and travel agencies, focusing on bookings and experience management. Mews, on the other hand, serves a broad spectrum of hotels—from boutique and mid-sized properties to large chains—offering comprehensive hotel management features. Are you more in need of a booking engine or a full-scale PMS?
Bokun is designed for managing tours, activities, and experience-based bookings, making it ideal for operators in the travel and recreation sectors. Mews offers an all-in-one cloud-based PMS that handles reservations, front desk operations, housekeeping, billing, and more, suited for hotels seeking operational automation.
While Bokun excels at product customization, inventory management, and integrations with travel channels, Mews provides extensive property management tools, over 1,000 integrations, and features like revenue management and guest CRM. Both solve distinct problems—so which core challenge is your hotel facing? Managing guest bookings or operational workflows?
If your hotel needs a robust system to handle day-to-day operations, revenue management, and guest engagement, go with Mews. It’s particularly suited for boutique hotels, chains, and properties looking for scalable, centralized management—evidenced by its 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, most recent reviews being only 6 months old.
If your hotel is a tour operator, activity provider, or experiences-focused business that requires booking customization, inventory control, and multi-channel distribution, Bokun could fit your needs. However, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, Bokun’s standing is weak—your team might be better served exploring other options.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use based on user reviews, with high marks for its modern, intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Hotels praise Mews’ mobile apps and automation features that reduce manual work, making staff adoption straightforward.
Bokun’s user experience is less clear, with no recent reviews to gauge its ease of use. Its interface is reportedly less refined, and support on implementation is described as lacking. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated channel management, and automated task management. It also offers tools for housekeeping, payments, and real-time reporting—features that streamline hotel operations.
Bokun provides no documented features beyond its core booking and inventory management for tours and activities. It does not offer comprehensive PMS features like billing, guest profiles, or automated workflows. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting its responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Users appreciate the instant support via 24/7 live chat and support portals, which helps maintain operational continuity.
Bokun’s support quality is unverified, with no recent reviews to assess. Given its weak overall rating, support likely lags behind Mews’s standards. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, POS systems, revenue tools, and more, creating a flexible tech environment. Bokun, however, has zero verified integration partners, limiting its connectivity options.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews allows hotels to customize and expand their tech stack easily—vital for modern operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s review count (758 reviews, 98 in the last 6 months) and high rating (4.62/5) clearly demonstrate superior market confidence. Hotels across segments—from boutique to large chains—consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set.
Bokun has no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, suggesting it is not trusted or actively used by hotelliers today. For a reliable, proven PMS, Mews wins decisively. Edge: Mews.
Bokun’s pricing is not publicly available, but it is generally considered more affordable or even free for certain experience management features. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or setup costs, making its pricing predictable and transparent.
Given the complexity of hotel operations, investing in a scalable PMS like Mews often yields better ROI despite higher upfront costs, especially considering its extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if you need comprehensive property management, billing, or guest engagement tools.
Not ideal if your primary focus is on experience-based activities rather than accommodations.
The core difference lies in scope. Mews offers a complete PMS tailored for hotel operations, while Bokun specializes in activity and experience bookings, mainly for tour operators.
If your hotel needs a full management system with automation, integrations, and guest management, Mews is the clear choice. Choose Bokun if your focus is solely on experience bookings and activities without the need for comprehensive hotel management features.
For hotels seeking reliability, scalability, and proven user satisfaction, Mews’s higher recent review count and ratings make it the stronger option. Bokun remains niche and underreviewed, making it less suitable for property management at this time.
In conclusion, if you want a trusted, well-supported platform ready to grow with your hotel, Mews is the recommended choice. For experience-based operators with minimal property management needs, Bokun might suffice, but better options are emerging.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Bokun |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Bokun e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Bokun |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Bokun e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Bokun oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Bokun: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Bokun tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos