The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Booking.com se destaca .
SiteMinder se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.3/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Performance Reporting and Mobile optimized/responsive.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 1,332 |
Apos analisar 1,332 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Booking.com mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do SiteMinder destacam channel manager capabilities, real-time inventory & rate management, desafios no suporte ao cliente. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Channel Manager Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Inventory & Rate Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Overbooking Issues
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Desafios no suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS and Other Systems
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Motor de reservas para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #44 0 avaliacoes | #1 470 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 527 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 96 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #1 50 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #48 0 avaliacoes | #1 564 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #50 0 avaliacoes | #1 411 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #45 0 avaliacoes | #1 230 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 174 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 157 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #5 266 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #34 0 avaliacoes | #1 418 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #3 13 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, guest experience, and operational efficiency. Both Booking Button by Booking.com and SiteMinder Booking Engine aim to boost direct bookings and streamline distribution but approach these goals very differently. Understanding their core strengths and weaknesses helps you determine which solution aligns best with your property’s needs.
Booking Button offers a simple, web-based solution tightly integrated with Booking.com’s ecosystem, while SiteMinder provides a more comprehensive platform with extensive features and integrations. Are you seeking ease of use or advanced functionality?
SiteMinder Booking Engine is the clear leader with over 1,200 recent reviews, a 4.48/5 overall rating, and a high likelihood to recommend (92%). Booking Button by Booking.com has no recent reviews and scores poorly on usability and support, making it a less reliable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes proven performance, extensive features, and global support, SiteMinder is the recommended option. For a minimalistic, Booking.com-focused tool, Booking Button may seem appealing but lacks recent validation.
Both products aim to convert website visitors into direct bookings, but their approaches diverge sharply. Booking Button is a lightweight, web-based widget designed to embed into existing hotel sites, drawing directly from Booking.com’s vast inventory and data. It’s primarily tailored for properties that want easy integration without complex setup, but it offers limited customization, features, and support—especially evidenced by no recent reviews or ratings.
SiteMinder’s booking engine is a comprehensive platform built for scalability, offering 39 unique features like multi-channel distribution, PMS connectivity, performance reports, and multi-currency support. It’s designed for hotels seeking operational control, robust integrations, and advanced revenue management tools, making it suitable for properties of all sizes, especially those with multi-property portfolios.
Do you need a simple booking button or a full-featured revenue engine? That’s the essential question.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement booking solution with no ongoing complexity, Booking Button might seem attractive. It’s web-based, requires no software installation, and is tightly coupled with Booking.com, making it ideal for small properties heavily reliant on Booking.com’s distribution.
However, given the absence of recent reviews, no validation on support or usability, and a lack of advanced features, Booking Button is better suited for very small hotels or those with minimal online booking requirements. Conversely, SiteMinder’s platform is tailored for hotels that want control, scalability, and a broad channel distribution network.
If you operate multiple properties, need detailed reporting, or want to integrate with PMS, SiteMinder’s extensive features and proven track record make it the clear choice. For properties prioritizing simplicity and direct Booking.com integration, Booking Button might suffice, but it’s a risky choice without recent feedback.
Booking Button offers an extremely simple, web-based embedding process, with no installation or updates needed. However, its lack of recent reviews means there’s little recent data on usability or onboarding. Its minimalistic approach might appeal to very small hotels or those with limited technical resources.
SiteMinder, rated 4.6/5 for ease of use with over 1,200 recent reviews, is recognized for its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding—users report it as “easy and functional.” Its platform offers a centralized dashboard, making day-to-day management accessible even for staff without technical backgrounds.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Booking Button is a single, straightforward feature—embedding a booking widget linked directly to Booking.com—lacking additional functionality. Meanwhile, SiteMinder boasts 39 features, including room & rate filtering, performance reporting, PMS connectivity, multi-lingual support, automated emails, rate intelligence, and more.
While Booking Button might suit a hotel with very basic needs, SiteMinder’s suite provides tools to optimize revenue, manage multiple channels, and analyze performance—features that can significantly drive growth. Its feature set is designed for properties that want operational control and strategic insight.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Booking Button’s support is unverified, with no recent reviews or ratings. Its vendor, Booking.com, offers support for its wider ecosystem, but direct, dedicated support for Booking Button is unclear.
SiteMinder, with a 4.43/5 customer support rating and over 1,200 recent reviews, is known for responsive, multilingual, and around-the-clock support. Clients frequently praise its onboarding process and ongoing assistance, which are vital during implementation and troubleshooting.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Booking Button, by nature, integrates primarily with Booking.com’s ecosystem. It has only 7 verified partners, including Booking.com, with limited scope. Its integrations are focused on simple website embedding.
SiteMinder connects with over 245 verified partners, including PMS, channel managers, payment gateways, and CRM systems. Its open API and extensive integrations enable properties to automate workflows and synchronize data across multiple systems effortlessly.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Booking Button’s lack of recent reviews means we have no current hotel ratings or segment-specific feedback. Its limited validation makes it difficult to assess overall user satisfaction.
SiteMinder’s reviews reveal an average rating of 4.48/5, with a 92% likelihood to recommend, particularly among boutique, city center, and resort hotels. Users describe it as “easy to use” and “helpful in reducing manual work,” indicating high satisfaction among a broad range of properties.
Edge: SiteMinder.
Booking Button offers no publicly available pricing details and appears to be included as part of Booking.com’s ecosystem, possibly at no direct cost but with commission and fee considerations.
SiteMinder charges a base fee of $500 per month, with no additional setup or per-booking fees. Its transparent pricing is suitable for hotels planning budgets and seeking predictable costs. However, larger or multi-property hotels may find pricing scalable based on their needs.
Not ideal if you need extensive customization, multi-channel distribution, or detailed analytics.
Not ideal if you need a simple booking widget or operate on a very tight budget, as the platform’s full capabilities come at a higher cost.
The core difference is that Booking Button is a basic, Booking.com-centric widget, while SiteMinder offers a full-fledged distribution and revenue management platform. If your hotel needs minimal online booking tools, Booking Button might be enough, but it’s untested in recent reviews and support.
Choose SiteMinder if you seek a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations, high user satisfaction, and a global presence. It is suited for hotels that want to grow, optimize revenue, and streamline operations.
Opt for Booking Button only if your needs are extremely limited, your reliance on Booking.com is high, and you prefer a no-cost, embedded widget. However, be aware of the lack of recent validation and support.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for reliable, scalable, and well-supported booking solutions, SiteMinder remains the superior choice.
Os precos de Motor de reservas raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Booking Button (by BookingSuite) e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| API aberta | ||
| Comparação da tarifa do quarto | ||
| Filtragem de tipo de quarto e tarifa | ||
| Filtros de compras de taxa rápida | ||
| Relatório de desempenho | ||
| Taxa de inteligência |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"As mentioned by Jacqueline, efficiency is key in the daily runnings of a property. The fast-paced nature of hospitality means that when guests have a problem, it needs to be solved..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The team understood our needs, and tweaked the interface to optimise performance accordingly."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We are a transformative business in the Southeast Asian market, in that guests can easily book stays of a varied length and be confident in the consistency of their experience. Thi..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory syn... The Channel Manager is identified as a reliable tool for managing multiple OTA connections, aiding in reduced manual updates and keeping inventory synchronized. It is particularly recognized for its stability in providing real-time updates and minimizing manual interventions.
SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings a... SiteMinder is praised for its ability to update room availability and rates across all connected OTAs instantly, which greatly prevents overbookings and ensures accuracy in distribution. Users appreciate the seamless and efficient synchronization with various OTAs, even during high demand periods.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individua... Although praised for its intuitive interface, users frequently request more customization options in the booking engine to better align with individual hotel branding. Including more flexible design elements could aid in differentiating a hotel's direct booking experience from OTAs.
Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particu... Embora a plataforma seja eficiente, alguns usuários expressaram preocupação com a lentidão nas respostas do suporte ao cliente, o que pode ser particularmente problemático durante os períodos de pico. Um suporte mais rápido e eficiente é apontado como uma área que precisa ser aprimorada.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Booking Button (by BookingSuite) e SiteMinder Booking Engine compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Booking Engine, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Booking Button (by BookingSuite) oferece 7 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto SiteMinder Booking Engine oferece 245. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. SiteMinder Booking Engine lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Booking Button (by BookingSuite): Nao. SiteMinder Booking Engine: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Booking Engine oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Booking.com tem um HT Score de 0 e SiteMinder tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos