The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,414 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
BookingCenter se destaca .
Cloudbeds se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.5/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,414 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 1,414 |
Apos analisar 1,414 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do BookingCenter mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Cloudbeds destacam intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversão de Moedas e Operações Financeiras
▾
|
|
|
−
Funcionalidade móvel
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de Gestão Hoteleira para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 675 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 235 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 51 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #4 5 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 546 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 245 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 145 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #2 96 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 532 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #4 166 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #3 201 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #3 13 avaliacoes |
When choosing a hotel management platform, your goal is to find a solution that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. BookingCenter by BookingCenter and Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds both aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in scope, features, and market presence. While BookingCenter claims to streamline property and distribution management, Cloudbeds provides a more integrated, feature-rich platform backed by a larger user base and more recent reviews. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth plans?
BookingCenter has been around since 2000, focusing on desktop and web-based property management with integrated GDS and OTA channels. However, it has zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, making its current credibility questionable. Conversely, Cloudbeds, founded in 2012, boasts 1,219 recent reviews (76 in the last six months), a 4.62/5 rating, and a 91% likelihood to recommend. Its customer satisfaction scores—ease of use, support, and value—far outperform BookingCenter, indicating a more reliable and user-approved solution.
The core difference is that BookingCenter offers a standalone PMS and channel management setup, while Cloudbeds delivers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with extensive integrations. With limited data on BookingCenter, can you confidently rely on its capabilities? Cloudbeds’ recent reviews suggest it’s the clearer choice for hotels seeking proven performance and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a straightforward PMS with basic reservation and distribution features, BookingCenter might seem suitable—especially if you’re an independent property that prefers desktop management. Yet, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, it’s hard to confirm its current effectiveness or support quality.
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich platform that unifies operations, distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement, Cloudbeds is the obvious winner. Its 1,219 reviews and 4.62/5 rating reflect high satisfaction across diverse hotel types, from boutique to large resorts, making it the better choice for growth-oriented hotels seeking reliability and ongoing innovation.
BookingCenter’s usability is impossible to evaluate due to zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, leaving its interface and onboarding experience unverified. In contrast, Cloudbeds enjoys a 4.58/5 ease-of-use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (rated 4.41/5), and minimal training requirements.
Recent reviews highlight that staff find Cloudbeds’ system straightforward, with many noting that even non-technical team members adapt quickly. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter provides core PMS functions, central reservation, and GDS integration, but offers no detailed feature count or recent user insights. Cloudbeds, on the other hand, boasts 90 unique features, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, multi-lingual support, revenue management, automated reporting, online check-in, guest messaging, and more.
While BookingCenter appears limited in scope, Cloudbeds delivers a broad suite capable of handling complex operations for diverse property types. Edge: Cloudbeds.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for BookingCenter support, leaving its service quality unverified. Cloudbeds, with a 4.38/5 customer support rating, receives frequent praise for its responsive, friendly, and helpful assistance—users describe their support as “excellent” and “quick to respond,” highlighting its reliability.
Given the recent positive feedback, Cloudbeds’ support system is clearly stronger and more dependable. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter’s integration count is limited to just 2 verified partners, including Airbnb, with only one shared partner. Cloudbeds outpaces this dramatically, with 190 verified integrations, including Airbnb, and unique partners like AdsHotel, Trevo, and Umi Digital.
This extensive integration ecosystem enables smoother operations and reduces manual work for your team. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter lacks recent reviews, ratings, or hotel segment data, rendering comparison impossible. Cloudbeds, however, is highly rated across hotel segments, with a 4.54/5 score from independent hotels, 4.63/5 from boutique hotels, and a 4.17/5 from smaller independent properties.
Recent reviews consistently praise Cloudbeds’ ease of use, reliability, and support. Its high ratings across varied hotel types demonstrate broad satisfaction, reinforcing its status as a trusted solution. Edge: Cloudbeds.
BookingCenter does not publicly disclose pricing or offer a trial, indicating either custom quotes or limited transparency. Cloudbeds charges a starting price of $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, but many users see it as offering good value given its extensive features.
If budget predictability and transparency matter, Cloudbeds’ clear pricing helps inform decision-making. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if you want a platform with modern features, broad integrations, or scalable growth options. Limited user feedback makes it risky for properties aiming to expand or modernize.
Not ideal if your property is very small with minimal tech needs or if you prefer traditional desktop-only software without cloud features.
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with proven user satisfaction, extensive features, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. It is suitable for hotels seeking to automate, scale, and enhance guest experiences, demonstrated by its high ratings and recent positive reviews.
BookingCenter may appeal to very small properties or those with minimal tech needs, but its lack of recent reviews and limited features make it a less reliable choice for most hotels aiming for growth or modernization. For a proven, feature-rich, and well-supported solution, Cloudbeds is the clear winner.
This detailed comparison aims to guide your decision-making process by aligning your hotel’s needs with the strengths of each platform. Based on current data, Cloudbeds emerges as the more reliable and versatile choice for modern hospitality operations.
Os precos de Software de Gestão Hoteleira raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, BookingCenter e Cloudbeds HMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conectividade PMS | ||
| Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções | ||
| Gestão de inventário | ||
| Integrações bidirecionais em tempo real | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Painel de análise |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 78 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Há preocupações quanto à precisão da conversão de moedas, especialmente em operações com múltiplas moedas. Os usuários destacaram discrepâncias que af... Há preocupações quanto à precisão da conversão de moedas, especialmente em operações com múltiplas moedas. Os usuários destacaram discrepâncias que afetam os processos de conciliação. Configurações aprimoradas para conversão de moedas poderiam simplificar a gestão financeira.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. BookingCenter e Cloudbeds HMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Management Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. BookingCenter oferece 2 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Cloudbeds HMS oferece 189. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Cloudbeds HMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
BookingCenter: Nao. Cloudbeds HMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Management Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. BookingCenter tem um HT Score de 0 e Cloudbeds tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos