The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Bookinglayer se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Bookinglayer mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Bookinglayer and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both systems aim to streamline reservations and property management, but their execution and market presence differ significantly. Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews and a score of zero, offers limited feedback, making it difficult to gauge current performance. Conversely, Mews benefits from over 758 reviews, with recent feedback from nearly 100 hotels, providing a clearer picture of its capabilities. Does your hotel prioritize a proven track record, or are you open to an emerging platform?
Bookinglayer and Mews both serve the property management segment but diverge sharply in market presence and review activity. Bookinglayer’s zero reviews over the past six months suggest limited real-world testing or recent updates, while Mews, with nearly 100 recent reviews, demonstrates ongoing customer engagement and product evolution. Mews also scores a high 4.62/5, compared to Bookinglayer’s 0/5, indicating stronger user satisfaction. Given the recent review activity and overall ratings, Mews is the more reliable choice for hotels seeking validated performance.
If your hotel operates at a larger scale or values extensive integrations, Mews is likely the better fit. It offers over 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like channel managers and payment systems, making it suitable for mid-sized to large properties. Bookinglayer’s single verified partner and limited features (none exclusive) suggest it’s better suited for small businesses or niche operators with minimal integration needs. For most hotels, especially those seeking scalability, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and proven support make it the superior choice.
User experience ratings showcase a clear advantage for Mews, with a 4.7/5 ease of use score from nearly 100 recent reviews. Customers consistently praise Mews for its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and minimal staff training. Bookinglayer, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides little insight into usability, but its lack of recent activity suggests it may not be keeping pace with current UI standards. Edge: Mews.
Mews outpaces Bookinglayer with 39 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting. Bookinglayer offers no exclusive features, limiting its appeal to basic booking functions. Mews’s advanced features like integrated CRS, automated night audit, and guest messaging demonstrate its focus on comprehensive operational management. For feature depth and variety, Mews holds a decisive edge.
Mews earns a 4.27/5 customer support rating, with recent reviews highlighting rapid responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance. Customers mention that Mews support is responsive, even resolving occasional bugs swiftly. In contrast, Bookinglayer’s support ratings are unavailable, and its reviews are nonexistent, indicating little recent customer feedback. Given the recent review activity, Mews’s support is clearly more reliable. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 336 verified integrations, encompassing channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, giving your hotel extensive flexibility. Bookinglayer’s single verified partner and lack of exclusive integrations suggest a more limited ecosystem. The breadth of Mews’s integrations allows for tailored, scalable tech stacks, critical for growth and efficiency. Edge: Mews.
Hoteliers rate Mews at 4.62/5, with recent reviews citing ease of use, automation, and robust support across a variety of hotel types—independent, boutique, large chains, and hostels. Bookinglayer’s zero reviews prevent meaningful comparison, but the absence of recent feedback signals limited market engagement. Based on current data, Mews is clearly the preferred choice among active users.
Bookinglayer’s pricing details are unavailable, but it is implied to be less expensive than Mews. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no implementation or hidden costs. If budget is a primary concern, Bookinglayer might seem attractive; however, the lack of recent reviews and features means you should weigh potential limitations against cost.
Mews’s core advantage lies in its proven reliability, extensive feature set, and active customer base. It significantly reduces manual work through automation, supports a broad network of integrations, and delivers a modern, user-friendly experience. If your hotel seeks a scalable, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, Mews is the clear choice.
Bookinglayer may appeal to niche operators or very small businesses with simple needs and a tight budget. However, its lack of recent reviews, limited features, and minimal integration options make it less suitable for hotels aiming to grow or modernize their operations.
For most hotels, especially those requiring a trusted platform backed by active users, Mews offers a compelling combination of usability, features, and support. It’s the platform that will better serve your team as you scale and innovate in a competitive market.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Bookinglayer e Mews PMS compartilham 20 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Bookinglayer e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Bookinglayer oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Bookinglayer: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Bookinglayer tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos