Cambridge PMS vs. Mews PMS: Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

Atualizado em May 9, 2026  ·  887 avaliacoes verificadas analisadas

TLDR

Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] se destaca .

Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.

Veja a analise completa abaixo ↓

Como Cambridge PMS se Compara a Mews PMS?

Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.

HTScore
0
99
Probabilidade de Recomendar
0%
93%
Facilidade de Uso
0.0/5
4.7/5
Suporte ao Cliente
0.0/5
4.3/5
Custo-Beneficio
0.0/5
4.4/5
Preco Inicial Contact sales From $900/mo
Avaliacoes Verificadas 0 887

Quais Sao os Pros e Contras de Cambridge PMS vs Mews PMS?

Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Mews Mews
Pros
+ Ease of Use
+ Automation and Integrations
+ Customizability and Flexibility
+ Integração e suporte
Contras
Billing and Invoicing
Relatórios e análises
Multi-Property Management

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] vs Mews: Rankings por Segmento Hoteleiro

Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.

Por Tamanho do Hotel

Segmento Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Mews Mews
Pequeno (10-24 quartos) #3 329 avaliacoes
Medio (25-74 quartos) #1 397 avaliacoes
Grande (75-199 quartos) #3 45 avaliacoes
Extra Grande (200+ quartos) #3 49 avaliacoes

Por Tipo de Propriedade

Segmento Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Mews Mews
Boutique #1 483 avaliacoes
Luxo #5 220 avaliacoes
Rede / Cadeia #2 170 avaliacoes
Estadia Prolongada #1 130 avaliacoes

Por Regiao

Segmento Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Mews Mews
America do Norte #8 106 avaliacoes
Europa #1 660 avaliacoes
Asia-Pacifico #10 17 avaliacoes
Oriente Medio #28 8 avaliacoes

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Cambridge PMS by Shiji and Mews PMS aim to streamline processes, but they diverge significantly in maturity, user adoption, and feature depth. With Mews boasting a larger, more recent review base and higher ratings, it’s clear that industry preference leans toward the cloud-native, highly integrated solution. Are you ready to prioritize current user feedback and real-world performance?

Is Cambridge PMS or Mews PMS Better for Hotels?

Cambridge PMS by Shiji has historically been a traditional, on-premise solution with a focus on basic property management. Its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s no longer a competitive choice in today’s fast-evolving hotel tech environment. Mews, on the other hand, is cloud-based, boasting over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, indicating widespread hotel satisfaction. Given its modern architecture and active development, Mews clearly addresses the needs of contemporary hotels better. Would you prefer a legacy system with limited updates or a vibrant, scalable platform?

Mews PMS vs Cambridge PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-first platform that integrates over 336 third-party tools—including revenue management, booking engine, and guest CRM—then Mews is the clear choice. It’s well-suited for independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains seeking rapid growth, thanks to its scalability and extensive marketplace. Conversely, if your property is small, with minimal tech needs and a preference for traditional on-premise solutions, Cambridge might seem suitable, but its lack of recent performance data makes it less reliable now.

Is Cambridge PMS or Mews PMS Easier to Use?

Mews’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.7/5 rating based on 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its modern interface, intuitive workflows, and quick onboarding. Reviewers describe Mews as “the most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market,” with many noting staff adoption is straightforward. Cambridge, with a 0/5 rating and virtually no recent reviews, offers no comparable user feedback, suggesting it’s outdated and difficult for modern teams. Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Features: Cambridge PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews provides over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and real-time reporting—many of which are absent in Cambridge. The latter’s lack of features and zero recent updates make it essentially a basic property management tool. If your hotel values automation, guest personalization, and operational flexibility, Mews’s extensive feature set gives it a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cambridge PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews is rated 4.27/5 for support, with recent reviews highlighting its prompt, helpful onboarding and ongoing assistance. Hoteliers remark that “support is responsive and proactive,” making deployment smoother. Conversely, Cambridge’s support scores and recent reviews are nonexistent, indicating it’s likely inactive or no longer prioritized. For ongoing success and troubleshooting, Mews’s support team is clearly more dependable. Edge: Mews.

Which Has More Integrations: Cambridge PMS or Mews PMS?

Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Duetto and a marketplace with over 1,000 apps covering revenue, channel management, POS, and more. Cambridge’s single verified partner severely limits its ecosystem. If your hotel relies on diverse integrations to enhance operations, Mews’s expansive ecosystem is essential. Edge: Mews.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cambridge PMS or Mews PMS?

With a 4.62/5 rating and nearly 758 recent reviews, predominantly from boutique, hostel, and independent hotels, Mews’s user satisfaction is evident. Many reviewers praise its modern design and automation, with comments like “it’s the easiest PMS to learn and use.” Cambridge remains unreviewed recently, making it impossible to compare recent user sentiment. Clearly, Mews holds the current favor among hoteliers. Edge: Mews.

How Much Do Cambridge PMS and Mews PMS Cost?

Cambridge PMS provides no publicly available pricing, typical of legacy systems, likely involving custom quotes or high implementation costs. Mews charges a fixed $900 monthly base fee, with additional costs depending on integrations and modules. While the total cost varies, Mews’s transparent pricing and high ROI are attractive for hotels seeking predictable costs and scalable solutions.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cambridge PMS?

  • Hotels that operate with minimal tech needs and prioritize traditional management.
  • Small properties with simple operations that don’t require extensive integrations.
  • Hotels in regions where legacy on-premise systems are still favored.
  • Properties that prefer fixed infrastructure over cloud solutions.
  • Not ideal if your hotel aims for modernization, automation, or multi-property management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Mews PMS?

  • Independent, boutique, and lifestyle hotels seeking modern, scalable solutions.
  • Hotels that prioritize automation, integrations, and guest experience.
  • Multi-property groups needing centralized management.
  • Hotels looking for real-time data, cloud access, and extensive customization.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prefers on-premise, legacy software, or has very basic operational needs.

Mews PMS vs Cambridge PMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

The core difference lies in their tech approach: Cambridge is a legacy, on-premise system with no recent updates, while Mews is a cloud-native platform with a proven track record of recent, high-quality reviews. If your hotel values ongoing innovation, extensive features, and user satisfaction, Mews is the clear winner. For hotels seeking a reliable, future-proof solution, Mews’s superior ecosystem and active support make it the better choice.

When to choose Mews

  • Your hotel needs a comprehensive, integrated platform that scales with your growth.
  • You want to improve operational efficiency through automation.
  • You value real-time data and extensive third-party integrations.
  • You seek a system backed by recent, positive reviews from a large user base.

When to consider Cambridge

  • Your property is small, with very basic management needs.
  • You prefer a traditional, fixed infrastructure system.
  • Budget constraints limit investment in modern tech.
  • You’re not ready to transition to cloud-based solutions or extensive integrations.

Our Verdict

Mews’s large, recent review base and high ratings demonstrate its dominance in today’s hotel management landscape. It offers a robust, feature-rich platform that’s proven to improve efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue for hotels of all sizes. Cambridge PMS, by comparison, appears obsolete given its lack of recent activity and reviews. If you want a future-proof, highly rated PMS, Mews is the clear, definitive choice for your hotel.

Quanto Custam Cambridge PMS e Mews PMS?

Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Mews Mews
Starting Price From $900/mo

Quais Funcionalidades Cambridge PMS Tem Que Mews PMS Nao Tem (e Vice-Versa)?

De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Cambridge PMS e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.

Funcionalidade Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] Mews Mews
CRM convidado
Motor de reservas
Multi Moeda
Multilíngue
Módulo de gestão de receitas
Perfis de convidados

Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.

Resultados Reais: Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] vs Mews por Objetivo de Negocio

Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.

Aumentar Receita e Reduzir Custos
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.

Mews Episode Tbilisi Pequeno
+ Zero connection fee costs
+ 11.9% booking engine conversion rate (average for independent hotels is 3.3%)
+ 9% higher ADR for direct bookings compared to OTAs

"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."

Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Nikoloz Cherkezishvili
Co-Founder & CEO, Episode Hotels
Aumentar Eficiencia Operacional
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.

Mews Aplend Apartments Medio
+ Five properties went live in the space of two weeks
+ One week from welcome call to go live date for several resorts
+ 80% faster to train new staff, cutting time from five working days to just one

"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."

Matej Matejka
Matej Matejka
Owner, Aplend Group
Melhorar a Experiencia do Hospede
Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]

Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.

Mews Leven Manchester Pequeno
+ 33% of guests use online check-in
+ 9% higher ADR for guests who use online check-in
+ Up to an hour saved per day for the front desk team

"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."

Kris Doyle
Kris Doyle
General Manager, Leven Manchester

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] vs Mews: Conclusao Final

Cambridge PMS [by Shiji]
0.0/5 de 0 avaliacoes
0.0/5 facilidade de uso 0.0/5 suporte 1 integracoes
Ver Perfil
Mews
Mews
4.7/5 de 887 avaliacoes

O que os hoteleiros adoram

Ease of Use 89% positivo

Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.

Automation and Integrations 69% positivo

Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.

Customizability and Flexibility 69% positivo

Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.

Onde os hoteleiros criticam

Billing and Invoicing 77% negativo

Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.

Relatórios e análises 60% negativo

Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis ​​e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.

Capacidades exclusivas

Multilíngue Multi Moeda Módulo de gestão de receitas Motor de reservas CRM convidado
4.7/5 facilidade de uso 4.3/5 suporte 336 integracoes
Visitar Site

Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem

Avaliacao Geral Mews 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
Facilidade de Uso Mews 4.7 vs 0.0 (+4.7)
Suporte ao Cliente Mews 4.3 vs 0.0 (+4.3)
Custo-Beneficio Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)
Integracao Mews 4.4 vs 0.0 (+4.4)

Perguntas Frequentes Sobre Cambridge PMS vs Mews PMS

Cambridge PMS pode substituir Mews PMS?

Depende dos seus requisitos. Cambridge PMS e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Cambridge PMS oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.

Qual e melhor para hoteis pequenos ou independentes?

Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.

Cambridge PMS ou Mews PMS oferecem um plano gratuito?

Cambridge PMS: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.

Como o HTR Avalia e Classifica Cambridge PMS e Mews PMS?

O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Cambridge PMS [by Shiji] tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.

Grupo de Criterios Peso O Que Mede
Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes

O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto?

Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso

O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao.

Ecossistema de Parceiros

O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa?

Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes

Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada.

Foco no Cliente

Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao?

Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil

Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades.

Alcance, Solidez e Recursos

Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa?

Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia

Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses.

As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →

Obtenha recomendações personalizadas de produtos

Consultor de recomendações de produtos

Ghostel icon

Vamos pesquisar as informações do seu hotel