The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 169 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Cashpad se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 169 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 169 |
Apos analisar 169 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Cashpad mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam interface do usuário e geração de relatórios, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Cashpad |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Interface do usuário e geração de relatórios
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personalização e Flexibilidade
▾
|
|
|
−
Aperfeiçoamentos operacionais
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas POS para hotéis para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 44 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 94 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 7 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #2 9 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 41 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #3 31 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #2 12 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #3 14 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 130 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #5 4 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #6 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right hotel POS system can significantly impact your operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Cashpad and Mews POS aim to streamline restaurant and front desk operations; however, their core strengths differ. Cashpad offers a basic platform with no recent reviews or user feedback, making its effectiveness uncertain. Mews POS, on the other hand, boasts a substantial review base, recent positive feedback, and proven integration within a broader hotel management ecosystem. Which product will truly meet your hotel’s needs?
Cashpad promises an all-in-one property management approach, focusing on reservation handling, guest communications, and operational oversight. Yet, with zero reviews or ratings, its reliability and usability in real-world settings remain unverified. Mews POS, with over 156 recent reviews and a high NPS score of 9.32, demonstrates strong user confidence, especially in hotel restaurant operations. This clear difference in review volume and recency indicates Mews’ superior market presence and trustworthiness.
Both products aim to improve transactional workflows; Cashpad markets itself as a comprehensive system, while Mews POS emphasizes seamless restaurant integrations and real-time reporting. However, without verified customer feedback on Cashpad, it’s difficult to assess its actual performance or user satisfaction. Mews POS’s positive reviews highlight its ease of use, automation capabilities, and extensive feature set, making it a more proven choice for hoteliers. Are you willing to gamble on a product with no reviews, or prefer a solution with proven success?
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-supported POS system with extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews POS. Its 336 verified partners, including popular channel managers and payment providers, make it versatile and adaptable. For properties seeking a flexible, feature-rich platform proven to improve operational flow, Mews is the clear choice.
If your hotel is looking for a simple, all-in-one property management solution with basic POS features, Cashpad might seem appealing; however, the lack of recent reviews or substantial customer feedback makes it a risky pick. Without verified user experiences or a proven track record, Mews POS remains the more dependable option. Would you invest in a system with extensive positive reviews or a new, untested platform?
Mews POS excels with a user rating of 4.74 out of 5, backed by 66 recent reviews, many praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding. Reviewers from various hotel types emphasize its mobile capabilities, flexibility, and quick staff adoption, with comments like “the user interface is very intuitive, allowing new colleagues to be trained quickly.” The onboarding process is smooth, supported by comprehensive training resources.
Cashpad, with a rating of 0/5 and no reviews, provides no data on usability or onboarding experience. The absence of feedback leaves uncertainty about how easily staff can learn or adapt to the platform. Given the clear user satisfaction with Mews, edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers 29 unique features, including PCI compliance, digital menus, advanced ordering, inventory management, recipe costing, and extensive reporting tools—covering a broad range of restaurant and hotel needs. In contrast, Cashpad has no listed or verified features, making its capabilities uncertain.
Mews’ feature set enables your team to automate tasks, manage inventory, analyze sales, and enhance guest engagement—all within a single platform. Cashpad’s limited or unverified feature list suggests it may not support the advanced operational demands of modern hotels. For a feature-rich experience, edge: Mews POS.
Mews support scores highly, with an average rating of 4.43 out of 5 and recent reviews praising its reliability and helpfulness. Customers highlight quick responses and effective onboarding support, with comments like “support team has consistently been reliable and solution-oriented.”
Cashpad provides no verifiable support ratings or recent feedback, leaving its support quality unknown. Without confirmed customer service data, you risk poor or unresponsive support from an untested platform. Edge: Mews POS.
Mews offers 336 verified integrations, including major channel managers, payment gateways, and revenue management tools, providing a flexible and connected system. Cashpad, with zero verified integrations, limits your options and potentially complicates workflows.
The extensive integration network of Mews allows your hotel to customize and expand its tech stack effortlessly, ensuring smooth data flow and operational cohesion. Without proven integrations, Cashpad’s capability to serve as a central hub remains questionable. Edge: Mews POS.
With 156 recent reviews and a 9.32 NPS score, Mews POS is highly rated, especially among hotels with diverse portfolios—including boutique, city center, and conference hotels. Reviewers consistently praise its usability, automation, and support for complex operations.
Cashpad’s review count is zero, meaning there’s no recent data to gauge user satisfaction. Given the positive, recent feedback for Mews, it’s clear that hoteliers rate Mews more favorably. Edge: Mews POS.
Cashpad’s pricing details are unavailable, and it’s unclear whether it operates on a subscription, freemium, or custom pricing model. Mews POS charges a base fee of $200 per month, with no free tier or trial, making its cost transparent but potentially higher.
Given Mews’s comprehensive features and support, its cost is justified for hotels seeking proven performance and extensive integrations. Lack of pricing transparency on Cashpad makes it difficult to assess its value. Edge: Mews POS.
Cashpad may appeal if your hotel’s focus is on minimal setup and simplicity, but the absence of verified customer feedback limits confidence in its capabilities.
Mews POS suits mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and multi-property groups looking for a trusted, feature-rich solution.
The core difference lies in market presence and proven success: Mews POS, with over 156 recent reviews and a 9.32 NPS score, is clearly more validated and trusted by hoteliers. Cashpad, without recent reviews or verified features, remains unproven and risky.
Choose Mews POS if your hotel values reliable support, extensive integrations, and a feature-rich system that’s rated highly by users. If your hotel prioritizes simplicity and minimal setup, Cashpad might seem appealing—yet, the lack of user feedback makes it a gamble.
In summary, for most hotels seeking stability, scalability, and proven performance, Mews POS is the recommended solution. Its comprehensive capabilities and positive user feedback make it the safer, smarter investment for your team.
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Cashpad e Mews POS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Cashpad |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cardápios Digitais | ||
| Compatível com PCI | ||
| Descontos e promoções | ||
| Divisão de cheques | ||
| Relatórios de Log de Pagamento | ||
| Upselling |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 17 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
A interface do Mews é descrita como moderna e intuitiva, facilitando uma navegação fluida. No entanto, algumas avaliações sugerem melhorias na complex... A interface do Mews é descrita como moderna e intuitiva, facilitando uma navegação fluida. No entanto, algumas avaliações sugerem melhorias na complexidade e flexibilidade das ferramentas de geração de relatórios, particularmente para configurações com múltiplas propriedades e análises operacionais detalhadas.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
A plataforma é elogiada por suas opções de personalização, que permitem fluxos de trabalho e alertas sob medida para aprimorar a experiência do hósped... A plataforma é elogiada por suas opções de personalização, que permitem fluxos de trabalho e alertas sob medida para aprimorar a experiência do hóspede. No entanto, os usuários também expressam a necessidade de recursos de personalização mais intuitivos para necessidades operacionais específicas e interações com os hóspedes.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Cashpad e Mews POS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel POS Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Cashpad oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews POS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews POS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Cashpad: Nao. Mews POS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel POS Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Cashpad tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos