The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
CASY Hotel Software se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do CASY Hotel Software mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between CASY Hotel Software and Mews PMS boils down to the scale of your operations, your technological needs, and your growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge sharply in market presence, features, and user feedback. While CASY’s local European focus and minimal reviews make it difficult to assess, Mews’s extensive recent data and global reach clearly favor it. Are you ready to prioritize a proven, well-supported platform?
CASY Hotel Software appears to offer a basic, possibly niche solution tailored for a specific region, with no recent reviews or visible customer ratings. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. This stark difference indicates Mews’s current dominance in hotel management solutions, especially in terms of customer satisfaction and usability.
CASY’s zero reviews and a 0/5 rating make it impossible to evaluate support, ease of use, or feature set confidently. Meanwhile, Mews’s high ratings across multiple categories—including an ease of use score of 4.7/5—provide a clearer picture of a mature, customer-centric platform. Do you want to risk your hotel’s future on an unverified solution?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable, and modern PMS with extensive integrations, go with Mews. It is ideal for hotels of all sizes seeking automation, real-time data, and broad third-party support, especially given its recent, robust reviews. If your operation is small, regional, or you’re exploring options without a clear focus on growth, CASY’s limited data and unknown features suggest a higher risk.
For independent hotels, boutique properties, and those prioritizing guest experience and operational efficiency, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. CASY might appeal if you are in a niche market or have specific regional requirements, but the lack of recent reviews hampers confidence. Is your hotel prepared to take a chance on an untested system?
Mews’s UI scores a 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its modern, intuitive design that minimizes staff training time. It offers a straightforward onboarding process, with users noting rapid setup and easy day-to-day operation. CASY provides no available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience.
Based on the data, Mews clearly leads in usability, supported by consistent positive feedback. Its cloud-based platform allows staff to work remotely, further reducing complexity. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides an impressive suite of 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, housekeeping modules, and advanced reporting—and it’s all built into one platform. CASY offers no listed features or unique functionalities, making comparative analysis impossible.
The extensive feature set of Mews enables it to serve comprehensive operational needs, from front desk to back office, and even guest engagement. CASY’s lack of visible features suggests it may be a limited or less sophisticated solution. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are solid with a 4.27/5, and numerous reviews highlight its responsive, helpful customer service. Users describe the onboarding process as “smooth” and support as “quick to resolve issues,” contributing to their high satisfaction.
CASY’s customer support scores and reviews are unavailable, creating uncertainty about its service quality. Given Mews’s established support infrastructure and recent positive feedback, it offers a safer, more reliable support experience. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including over 1,000 applications via its Marketplace, covering channel management, payments, revenue management, and more. CASY has no verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its potential to connect with other hotel systems.
This extensive integration network makes Mews highly adaptable, enabling hotels to build a customized tech ecosystem that scales with their needs. CASY’s absence of integration options suggests it’s not suited for multi-system or advanced operational environments. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews and overall rating of 4.62/5 reflect widespread hotel satisfaction across segments—particularly boutique, independent, and mid-sized properties. Hotelier testimonials praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with many stating it “transformed operations” and “boosted revenue.”
CASY’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison. Without recent feedback, you cannot confidently gauge its performance or hotel satisfaction. Based on available data, Mews is clearly the more highly-rated option. Edge: Mews.
CASY’s pricing is undisclosed, with no free trial or public quotes available. Mews’s base price is $900 per month, with no implementation fees or tiered charges, making it transparent and predictable.
While Mews’s cost might be higher upfront, its value is reflected in its features, integrations, and support, which many hoteliers find justifies the investment. The absence of clear pricing for CASY complicates budget planning and comparison. Edge: Mews.
The core difference lies in maturity and scope. Mews is a cloud-native, feature-rich platform with recent, positive reviews that support its versatility and reliability. CASY, with no visible features or recent feedback, appears limited and less trustworthy.
If your hotel seeks a proven, broad solution with ongoing support and integrations, choose Mews—its large user base and recent accolades demonstrate its effectiveness. CASY might serve very small or regional operations, but the lack of recent data makes it a risky investment. For most hotels aiming for growth and operational excellence, Mews is the clear choice.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Casy e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Casy e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Casy oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Casy: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. CASY Hotel Software tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos