The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Acantech se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Acantech mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Acantech |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Chr365 by Acantech and Mews PMS aim to simplify your daily tasks, but they diverge sharply in maturity, user reception, and capabilities. Is your team ready to adopt a system that’s proven to support modern hospitality or one still establishing its presence?
Chr365 offers a solution that’s less documented and reviewed, while Mews has a proven track record with over 750 recent reviews and a near-perfect rating. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
Chr365 by Acantech is a relatively unknown player with zero reviews and a very limited market presence, primarily serving niche or small-scale operators. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 overall rating and a 9.12/10 NPS score, reflecting broad trust and recent positive experiences from users worldwide.
While Chr365 claims to address property management needs, its lack of user feedback and absence of verified integrations or extensive feature sets make it difficult to evaluate its real-world utility. Mews, however, offers a cloud-native, feature-rich platform that streamlines operations and enhances guest experiences, proven through constant positive reviews.
Are you comfortable choosing an untested system, or do you prefer the confidence that comes with a well-reviewed leader?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable solution with extensive integrations, choose Mews. Its ecosystem includes over 336 verified partners, supporting everything from channel management to revenue optimization, and it’s trusted by hospitality brands across the globe.
If your hotel operates on a very small scale or in a niche market where minimal features suffice, Chr365 might seem appealing — but the lack of reviews or proven performance makes this a risky choice. For any hotel seeking a mature, well-supported PMS, Mews is the clear winner.
For hoteliers prioritizing operational automation, guest engagement, and future-proofing, Mews’s extensive capabilities make it the logical pick. Chr365, lacking evidence of effectiveness or support, appears unsuitable for hotels looking to grow or modernize.
Mews scores highly for user-friendliness, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating from verified reviews. Users highlight its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding, with many noting they can set up the platform within days and train staff easily.
Chr365, on the other hand, has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability or onboarding experience. Its limited documentation and absence of user feedback suggest a less polished, less user-friendly product.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, channel manager, integrated POS, automation tools, and real-time reporting. These features are designed to support a full-scale, modern hotel operation and are regularly updated.
Chr365 provides no verified features or differentiators, which raises questions about its capabilities. Without a clear feature set or user validation, it’s impossible to compare it meaningfully to Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support system has a reputation for responsiveness, with a 4.27/5 support rating from users who appreciate their quick resolution times and active customer success teams. Many reviewers mention that Mews support helps them implement new features effectively and troubleshoot efficiently.
Chr365, with no reviews or support ratings available, cannot be confidently evaluated. The lack of feedback suggests limited support options, which could be a concern for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, covering channel management, payment providers, revenue tools, and more. Its open API and Marketplace enable seamless connectivity, allowing hotels to customize their tech stacks.
Chr365 has no publicly verified integrations or partner list, limiting its utility in multi-system environments. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected platform, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s reviews are recent, over 98 in the last six months, with a 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend, across diverse property types including boutique hotels, hostels, and large brands. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with many noting measurable operational improvements.
Chr365 has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or confidence. The absence of feedback significantly diminishes its credibility compared to Mews’s proven track record.
Edge: Mews.
Chr365’s pricing is unavailable, which is common among less-established systems. Mews charges a base price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or optional charges, providing predictable costs.
The lack of transparent pricing for Chr365 hampers your ability to evaluate ROI, whereas Mews’s clear pricing structure supports budget planning and value assessment.
Given the lack of reviews and features, Chr365 is best suited for very small-scale operations with limited future expansion ambitions.
Mews’s versatility and extensive feature set make it suitable across virtually all hotel types aiming for operational excellence and guest satisfaction.
Mews stands out as the more mature, reviewed, and feature-rich solution with a broad ecosystem and proven customer satisfaction. Chr365’s lack of reviews, features, and integrations makes it a risky choice for hotels serious about growth and efficiency.
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable platform backed by recent positive reviews, go with Mews. Its extensive features, support, and integrations justify its higher price point and make it the smarter long-term investment.
Choose Chr365 only if your requirements are minimal, your budget is tight, and you’re comfortable with the unknown. For most hoteliers, Mews is the safer, more capable choice to support today’s demands and tomorrow’s growth.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Acantech |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Chr365 e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Acantech |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Chr365 e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Chr365 oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Chr365: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Acantech tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos