The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Ciaobooking se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Ciaobooking mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Ciaobooking by Ciaobooking and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. While Ciaobooking promises automation and guest insights, its lack of reviews and regional presence make it less credible than Mews, which boasts a solid foundation, extensive integrations, and over 750 recent reviews. Are you prepared to prioritize proven reliability over untested promise?
Ciaobooking positions itself as an all-in-one solution with AI-driven guest review analysis and automation, but its credibility is limited by zero reviews and no regional footprint. Mews, on the other hand, is a globally recognized leader with over 750 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 9.12/5 NPS score, confirming its trusted status among hoteliers. Where Ciaobooking offers vague promises, Mews delivers a well-established, trusted platform with proven results.
Do you want a system with no reviews or one backed by the voice of hundreds of hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, go with Mews. Its extensive marketplace of over 336 verified integrations, a global presence covering 54 countries, and a high user satisfaction rating make it ideal for properties seeking reliability and adaptability. If, however, your hotel is very small, regionally focused, or willing to experiment with unverified vendors, Ciaobooking might seem attractive—but beware of the lack of reviews, regional support, and comprehensive features.
In summary, for most hotels aiming for stability and growth, Mews is the safer choice.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 in ease of use, supported by a modern, intuitive interface, comprehensive onboarding, and a support team rated at 4.27/5. Multiple reviewers praise Mews for its user-friendly design, fast setup, and ongoing support, making staff adoption straightforward. Conversely, Ciaobooking offers no review data, leaving its usability unverified and potentially risky for staff training and adoption.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and advanced automation tools—many of which are absent in Ciaobooking. Ciaobooking, by comparison, provides no documented features, placing it at a significant disadvantage. The depth and breadth of Mews’ features provide your team with a versatile toolkit to adapt to diverse operational needs.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with many reviews highlighting responsive onboarding and ongoing assistance, even amidst occasional technical issues. Ciaobooking’s support ratings are unavailable, making it impossible to assess its reliability or responsiveness. Given the importance of dependable support in hotel operations, Mews clearly leads in this category.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, enabling extensive customization. Ciaobooking has zero verified partners documented, limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For hotels seeking a flexible tech ecosystem, Mews’ expansive suite of integrations is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’ recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 rating with high scores across ease of use, support, and value. Hoteliers from boutique to large properties praise Mews for its reliability, innovation, and positive impact on operations. Ciaobooking’s lack of reviews leaves its user satisfaction unverified and unlikely to match Mews’ proven reputation.
Edge: Mews.
Ciaobooking’s pricing details are absent, and it does not offer a trial, raising concerns about transparency and value. Mews charges a starting price of $900 per month, with no implementation fees or trial options listed. Its predictable pricing structure and documented value make it easier to justify a long-term investment.
In conclusion, Mews offers clearer, more transparent pricing aligned with its comprehensive feature set.
Mews is a tried-and-true, feature-packed PMS trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide, with recent reviews confirming its effectiveness. Its extensive integrations, support, and proven impact on hotel operations clearly position it as the better choice for most properties.
If your hotel needs a dependable, scalable, and well-supported system, choose Mews. Its large user base, ongoing innovation, and high satisfaction scores make it the logical option.
However, if you operate a very small property with minimal tech needs and are willing to accept an unverified platform, Ciaobooking might suffice—though the risk remains high without reviews or proven support.
In summary, for long-term stability and growth, Mews is the clear winner—an investment in your hotel’s future.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Ciaobooking |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Ciaobooking e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Ciaobooking |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Ciaobooking e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Ciaobooking oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Ciaobooking: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Ciaobooking tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos