The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 120 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
CiHMS se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades Resorts (0.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Housekeeping module.
char desarrollo de sistemas slu se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 120 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 120 | 0 |
Apos analisar 120 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do CiHMS mais valorizam operational efficiency, relatórios avançados, gerenciamento de tarefas e recursos, enquanto os usuarios do char desarrollo de sistemas slu destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Relatórios avançados
▾
|
|
|
+
Gerenciamento de Tarefas e Recursos
▾
|
|
|
+
Acessibilidade baseada em nuvem
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Relatórios avançados
▾
|
|
|
−
Treinamento e integração do usuário
▾
|
|
|
−
Funcionalidade Móvel
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #45 8 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #20 31 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #4 43 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #4 31 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 65 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #10 83 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #15 40 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #17 15 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #65 0 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa | #58 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #6 117 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio | #24 1 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right property management system for your hotel hinges on understanding how each platform addresses your operational needs. CiHMS by CiHMS offers a well-rated, feature-rich solution with extensive reviews and recent user feedback, while PMS Link by char desarrollo de sistemas slu remains unreviewed and untested in the market. This gap makes CiHMS the more reliable option for hoteliers seeking proven performance and ongoing support.
Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but CiHMS’s comprehensive feature set and strong customer backing set it apart. Will your hotel benefit from the certainty of a platform with verified success and active user reviews?
CiHMS is a cloud-based PMS designed for medium to large hotels, resorts, and hotel chains aiming for operational efficiency and advanced management features. Its 101 reviews, most from recent periods, underscore its reliability and high customer satisfaction, with a 4.92/5 support rating and a 9.8/10 NPS score.
PMS Link, on the other hand, lacks any reviews or market presence, making it impossible to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Its unverified status raises questions about its performance, support, and suitability for demanding hotel environments.
While CiHMS’s feature set includes revenue management, channel management, integrated CRS, and automation tools, PMS Link’s capabilities are not documented, leaving hoteliers uncertain about its offerings. Do you want the safety of a proven system backed by real user feedback, or are you comfortable risking unverified tools with no peer reviews?
End of the day, your choice depends on a clear picture of what each solution can reliably deliver. Given the absence of reviews for PMS Link, does it make sense to choose an untested platform over a trusted market leader?
Edge: CiHMS.
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich PMS capable of managing complex operations, CiHMS is the clear choice. It caters well to resorts, city hotels, and chains, with detailed modules for revenue management, digital registration, housekeeping, and multi-channel integrations.
If your hotel is smaller or less complex, and you’re willing to adopt an unreviewed system, PMS Link might seem appealing—yet without reviews, it’s risky. The lack of documented features or support makes it unsuitable for properties requiring dependable performance.
For hoteliers prioritizing automation, real-time reporting, and extensive integrations, CiHMS’s proven track record and broad feature set make it the safer, smarter investment. However, if you’re testing new technology without regard for proven support, PMS Link's unknowns could be a costly gamble.
In short, choose CiHMS if you value stability, documented features, and peer validation. Opt for PMS Link only if you’re willing to risk unsupported, unreviewed software with no clear benefits.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS boasts a 4.9/5 ease of use rating based on over 100 reviews, with hoteliers praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Most users find onboarding smooth with minimal training, and the system’s lean UI makes daily operations manageable.
PMS Link has no available reviews or usability ratings, so assessing its ease of use isn’t possible. Without user feedback, you cannot confidently determine if the platform is intuitive or requires extensive training.
Given CiHMS’s high ratings and recent positive reviews, it is clearly easier to adopt and operate for your team. The absence of feedback for PMS Link makes evaluating its user-friendliness impossible, adding unnecessary risk.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s 33 unique features include a booking engine, revenue management, integrated CRS, channel manager, digital registration, automated night audit, and housekeeper mobile apps. These features support complex operations and multi-channel distribution, with some functionalities—like automated space optimization and guest profiles—absent in PMS Link.
PMS Link offers no documented features, making comparison impossible. Its lack of visible modules or integrations leaves hoteliers uncertain whether it can support key operational needs such as reservations, billing, or reporting.
For comprehensive management, CiHMS’s extensive feature set provides a distinct advantage. PMS Link’s unverified capabilities leave hoteliers guessing whether it can meet operational demands.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS’s 4.92/5 customer support rating, based on recent reviews, reflects a dedicated support team that responds promptly and professionally. Guests report that support is “exceptional,” and onboarding is rated at 4.84/5, with many praising the continuous assistance during implementation.
There are no reviews or support ratings available for PMS Link, so assessing its customer service is impossible. Without feedback, there’s no way to determine how well the vendor addresses technical issues or supports hotel staff.
Given the high satisfaction levels for CiHMS, it’s the safer choice for hoteliers who need dependable, quick help. PMS Link’s support quality remains an unknown, risking potential delays or unresolved issues.
Edge: CiHMS.
With 101 reviews and a near-perfect NPS of 9.8/10, hoteliers clearly favor CiHMS. Property types such as resorts and city hotels, with recent reviews, consistently rate it highly for usability, support, and functional depth.
PMS Link has no ratings or reviews, leaving its reputation unverified. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to determine if it meets hotel operator expectations or if it’s considered reliable.
For properties seeking peer validation, CiHMS’s proven, high-rated performance makes it the preferred choice. PMS Link’s lack of reviews indicates it has yet to win trust or demonstrate its value.
Edge: CiHMS.
CiHMS is priced at a flat monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or trial fees, offering transparent costs for hotels considering its extensive features. This cost includes all modules, support, and updates.
PMS Link’s pricing is not publicly available, and no trial information is provided. The absence of transparent pricing makes budgeting and comparison difficult.
Given the known, fixed pricing of CiHMS, your hotel can plan budgets confidently. The lack of cost transparency for PMS Link introduces uncertainty and potential hidden fees.
Edge: CiHMS.
Hotels that require an advanced PMS capable of managing multiple channels, revenue optimization, and large-scale operations should consider CiHMS. It’s suitable for resorts, city hotels, chains, and properties with complex needs.
Teams that value automation, comprehensive reporting, and integration with other hotel systems will find CiHMS’s features align well with their goals. Its scalable architecture supports growth and multiple property management.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity, or if you prefer a lightweight, low-cost solution. Such properties might find the extensive feature set unnecessary or overwhelming.
Bullets:
Edge: CiHMS.
Given the lack of reviews or detailed features, PMS Link is best suited for experimental or smaller properties willing to test unverified solutions. It might appeal to hotels with very limited operational complexity or those open to custom, in-house development.
Teams that want a basic system for simple reservations or guest management without extensive integrations could consider PMS Link if they’re comfortable with unreviewed software. It may also suit properties in regions where the vendor offers specific support and customization.
Not ideal if you need reliable, proven features, extensive integrations, or responsive support. Larger hotels, resorts, or chains should avoid it until it gains market validation and reviews.
Bullets:
Edge: PMS Link.
CiHMS stands out as a mature, feature-rich solution with solid reviews and recent positive feedback from a diverse range of hotel types. Its extensive modules, high satisfaction scores, and proven support infrastructure provide a level of certainty that PMS Link cannot match.
If your hotel seeks a dependable platform with documented features, active market presence, and peer validation, CiHMS is the clear choice. It enhances daily operations, supports growth, and reduces risks associated with untested technology.
PMS Link might appeal in very niche or experimental contexts, but without reviews or proven performance, it remains an untested option. For most hotels, especially those seeking reliability, CiHMS offers a safer, more effective investment.
In summary, choose CiHMS if stability, proven success, and comprehensive features matter. Only consider PMS Link if your risk appetite is high, you’re testing new solutions, or your operational needs are minimal.
Edge: CiHMS.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, CiHMS e PMS Link compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gerente de canal | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Módulo de spa e bem-estar | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 21 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 2 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"CiHMS was able to fulfill the needs of loyalty management of The Hanoi Club & Residences. The team has perfectly adapted and customized CiHMS to match the specific needs with a 24/..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"I was impressed by CiHMS's capability to integrate all our properties into one cohesive system," said Mr. Nam Le, General Manager of Cityhouse. "The user-friendly interface and rob..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement re... CIHMS significantly enhances operational efficiency by automating tasks and ensuring streamlined communication across departments. This improvement reduces manual errors and saves time, which is especially crucial during busy periods.
Os usuários apreciam os recursos abrangentes de relatórios do CIHMS, que permitem análises aprofundadas de desempenho, receita e ocupação. No entanto,... Os usuários apreciam os recursos abrangentes de relatórios do CIHMS, que permitem análises aprofundadas de desempenho, receita e ocupação. No entanto, muitos usuários buscam maior personalização para adaptar os relatórios a necessidades específicas.
O software é elogiado por seus recursos de atribuição de tarefas, que permitem a gestão independente por parte da equipe, como a limpeza. Essa funcion... O software é elogiado por seus recursos de atribuição de tarefas, que permitem a gestão independente por parte da equipe, como a limpeza. Essa funcionalidade agiliza as operações e aumenta a produtividade em todos os departamentos.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Os usuários apreciam os recursos abrangentes de relatórios do CIHMS, que permitem análises aprofundadas de desempenho, receita e ocupação. No entanto,... Os usuários apreciam os recursos abrangentes de relatórios do CIHMS, que permitem análises aprofundadas de desempenho, receita e ocupação. No entanto, muitos usuários buscam maior personalização para adaptar os relatórios a necessidades específicas.
Embora o CIHMS seja fácil de usar, o treinamento inicial e a integração podem ser complexos devido à amplitude de recursos do sistema. Os usuários sug... Embora o CIHMS seja fácil de usar, o treinamento inicial e a integração podem ser complexos devido à amplitude de recursos do sistema. Os usuários sugerem recursos de treinamento mais abrangentes e guias detalhados.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. CiHMS e PMS Link compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. CiHMS oferece 3 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto PMS Link oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. CiHMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
CiHMS: Nao. PMS Link: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. CiHMS tem um HT Score de 81 e char desarrollo de sistemas slu tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos