The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Ciirus se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Ciirus mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Ciirus |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can be transformative for your hotel’s operations and guest experience. Both Ciirus and Mews aim to streamline your workflows and improve efficiency, but they diverge sharply in execution and market presence. While Ciirus is a niche platform with virtually no recent reviews or notable ratings, Mews stands out as a proven, highly-rated solution with extensive features and broad adoption. How do these differences influence your decision?
Ciirus is marketed as a comprehensive vacation rental PMS, but with an overall rating of 0/5 based on no reviews, it offers little recent feedback or validation from actual users. Conversely, Mews has a 4.62/5 rating with over 750 reviews, including 98 in the last six months, making it the more reliable choice based on current user experience. While Ciirus’s lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to assess, Mews's active user base demonstrates ongoing satisfaction and continuous development.
Both products aim to solve property management challenges, but Ciirus’s limited feature set and absence of verified integrations suggest a lack of depth. Mews, on the other hand, offers over 59 unique features and 336 verified integrations, making it far more adaptable for modern hotel operations. Given the significant gap in market presence, customer feedback, and feature depth, is it worth risking your hotel’s future on a platform with no recent validation?
If your hotel primarily operates as a vacation rental or small-scale property seeking a straightforward management experience, Ciirus might seem appealing—though the lack of recent reviews makes this uncertain. For hotels aiming for scalability, automation, and integration, Mews clearly emerges as the superior option, especially for boutique and mid-sized properties, with proven success stories and a comprehensive feature set.
Hotels that need a well-supported, cloud-native system capable of handling reservations, guest communications, and revenue management should go with Mews. If your hotel requires multi-property management, extensive third-party integrations, or a robust marketplace for add-ons, Mews is the recommended platform. Does your property prioritize proven reliability and ongoing support? Then Mews is the sensible choice.
With a 0/5 ease of use rating for Ciirus and a 4.7/5 rating for Mews, the gap in user experience is stark. Mews’s intuitive, modern interface, backed by positive reviews praising its simplicity and ease of onboarding, makes staff adoption smoother. Users report that Mews’s onboarding process, rated at 4.39/5, is clear and well-supported, leading to quicker ramp-up times.
In contrast, Ciirus provides no recent user feedback or ratings on usability, which is a red flag for hotel teams seeking a straightforward implementation. Based on current data, edge: Mews.
Ciirus claims to be a comprehensive PMS but offers only 0 unique features, suggesting limited capabilities. Mews, however, boasts 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and automation tools, many of which are absent in Ciirus.
Specific functions like integrated CRS, digital registration, automated reminders, and guest messaging are exclusive to Mews, enabling a more personalized and efficient guest journey. For hotel operators seeking robust automation and customization, edge: Mews.
Ciirus has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Mews, with a 4.27/5 customer support rating based on 758 reviews, is widely praised for its responsive, helpful team and proactive onboarding assistance, though some users mention occasional bugs.
Recent reviews highlight Mews’s support as a key factor in their satisfaction, citing quick issue resolution and ongoing training. Given the lack of validation for Ciirus’s support, edge: Mews.
Ciirus has zero verified integrations, severely limiting its flexibility and potential for growth. Mews, with 336 verified partners, integrates with channel managers, payment providers, CRMs, and other essential hotel tech.
Shared integrations are nonexistent, but Mews’s extensive ecosystem supports diverse operational needs, providing a tailored tech stack. For hotels seeking connectivity and automation, edge: Mews.
With no recent reviews for Ciirus, there’s no current data to gauge hotel satisfaction. Mews, rated 4.64/5 among 679 reviews (including 98 recent ones), enjoys high approval from boutique, independent, and city hotel segments.
Mews’s positive feedback emphasizes its ease of use, automation, and support, with some hotelers noting it has transformed their operations. For reliable, up-to-date ratings, edge: Mews.
Ciirus does not publish pricing details, leaving potential buyers in the dark. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no implementation or extra fees noted.
While Mews’s pricing may seem high, its extensive features and integrations justify the cost for most hotels seeking growth and efficiency. Without transparent pricing, the decision favors Mews, which offers clear value.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Core difference: Mews is a well-supported, full-featured PMS with a broad ecosystem, while Ciirus offers a limited, less validated platform with no recent reviews. For most hotels, Mews’s extensive features, integrations, and proven customer satisfaction make it the clear choice.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs automation, connectivity, and scalability—its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its reliability. For boutique hotels, independents, and multi-property operators seeking growth, Mews is the recommended solution.
Opt for Ciirus only if your operation is limited to basic vacation rentals with no plans for expansion or integration, and you’re comfortable with the lack of current validation. Given the market landscape, Mews’s proven track record makes it the more dependable partner for the future.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Ciirus |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Ciirus e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Ciirus |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Ciirus e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Ciirus oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Ciirus: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Ciirus tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos