The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Citadel se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Citadel mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Citadel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Citadel by Citadel and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but Citadel’s limited review data and absence from recent feedback make it a less reliable choice. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, extensive features, and strong support. Are you prepared to trust a platform backed by vibrant user confidence?
While Citadel claims to safeguard digital assets with AI-driven cybersecurity, it’s not a property management system in the traditional sense. Mews, with its cloud-based PMS, is built explicitly for hoteliers seeking operational and guest experience improvements. Which product aligns more with your core priorities?
Citadel’s core offering appears to focus on cybersecurity rather than hotel operations, with no recent reviews or user feedback to support its effectiveness for property management. Mews, however, is a mature, widely adopted PMS with over 750 reviews, 98 in the last six months, and a 9.12/5 NPS score, indicating high user satisfaction.
Mews’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface, automation, and extensive integrations, making it well-suited for modern hotels. Citadel’s lack of recent validation and absence of user feedback suggest it’s not a serious contender in the PMS space. Are you willing to risk choosing a platform without current user validation? Clearly, Mews stands out as the more credible and proven option.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a broad partner ecosystem, go with Mews. It is ideal for boutique hotels, city center properties, hostels, and chains that want automation, integrations, and guest-centric tools. Citadel’s cybersecurity focus and lack of hotel-specific features make it unsuitable for daily hotel management.
If your priority is digital security and threat detection—perhaps for data protection—it’s worth exploring Citadel, but only as a complementary solution, not a PMS. For core property management, Mews’s proven track record, feature set, and positive recent reviews make it the clear choice for hotels wanting to improve operations and guest satisfaction.
Mews’s ease of use is highly praised, with a 4.7/5 rating and recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Users describe Mews as “very user-friendly,” with “an intuitive setup” that simplifies complex tasks like reservations and payments.
Citadel, however, scores a 0/5 with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess usability or onboarding quality. Given the positive feedback and high usability ratings for Mews, it’s clear that Mews is the easier platform to adopt and operate daily. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, and real-time reporting. Its extensive marketplace with over 1,000 integrations allows hotels to customize and extend functionality.
Citadel provides no publicly available features or integrations, rendering it unsuitable as a PMS. The sheer volume and quality of features in Mews, combined with its open API, give it a decisive advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive management tools. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings (4.27/5) and recent positive reviews highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team that resolves issues efficiently. Hotelers praise Mews’s onboarding process and ongoing support, often citing support as a key factor in successful adoption.
Citadel has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given Mews’s consistent praise in recent reviews, it clearly provides better support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including shared integrations with Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, and offers over 1,000 integrations through its marketplace. Citadel has zero verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its flexibility and scalability.
For hotels looking to connect with channel managers, revenue tools, or guest engagement platforms, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a significant advantage. Citadel’s lack of integrations disqualifies it from serious consideration in a modern hotel tech stack. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and 93% likelihood to recommend are backed by recent reviews from diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels. Hoteliers consistently praise its user-friendliness, automation, and support.
Citadel has no recent reviews or ratings, so it cannot be compared. Based on current data, Mews is clearly the preferred choice among hotel operators. Edge: Mews.
Citadel’s pricing is not publicly available, but it appears to be a cybersecurity platform rather than a PMS, which likely involves custom quotes. Mews’s standard pricing is $900 per month, with no implementation fees or additional charges, making it transparent and predictable.
Given the lack of pricing transparency for Citadel, and considering Mews’s straightforward model, for hotel management needs, Mews’s value proposition is clearer and more accessible.
Citadel excels as a cybersecurity solution but does not serve as a PMS, making it unsuitable for hotel operations. Mews, with its proven, feature-rich platform and extensive recent positive reviews, is the clear choice for hotels seeking efficiency, guest satisfaction, and scalability.
If your hotel needs a management system that automates, integrates, and improves guest experiences, go with Mews. Citadel may be valuable for data security, but it does not replace the operational capabilities of a modern PMS—make your decision based on your core needs.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features make it the stronger choice for your hotel. Citadel’s lack of recent validation and absence from the hotel management space put it at a disadvantage.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Citadel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Citadel e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Citadel e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Citadel oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Citadel: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Citadel tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos