The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 79 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Clock se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (5.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Jonas Hospitality se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 79 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 79 | 0 |
Apos analisar 79 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Clock mais valorizam ease of use and accessibility, reservation and booking management, atendimento e suporte ao cliente, enquanto os usuarios do Jonas Hospitality destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Accessibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Booking Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Atendimento e suporte ao cliente
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e conectividade
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Personalização e Flexibilidade
▾
|
|
|
−
Dispositivos móveis e interface do usuário
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de Gestão Hoteleira para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #21 19 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #14 28 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #17 2 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #5 5 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #18 30 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #18 14 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #15 15 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #16 8 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #17 11 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #9 38 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico | #12 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio | #18 2 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Clock HMS by Clock and Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, current infrastructure, and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Clock offers a more established and reviewed platform with extensive features and recent positive feedback. Jonas Hospitality, despite its broader industry scope, lacks recent reviews and detailed user feedback, making Clock the more reliable choice today.
Clock focuses on automating daily hotel management, reservations, and guest interactions, with proven success in boosting revenue and operational efficiency. Jonas Hospitality emphasizes a unified approach, but its lack of recent reviews and fewer integrations make it a less tested option for hoteliers seeking immediate results. Are you ready to dive into the specifics?
Both Clock and Jonas Hospitality aim to simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. Clock provides a comprehensive, feature-rich system with proven effectiveness, while Jonas Hospitality offers a broader platform targeting multiple industry segments, including hotels. The critical difference lies in their market presence: Clock has 63 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.88/5, whereas Jonas Hospitality has no recent reviews and a zero rating, making Clock the more trusted choice.
Clock excels in delivering a user-friendly experience backed by high satisfaction scores and recent positive feedback. Jonas Hospitality’s platform may suit larger or multi-property operators looking for scalability, but without recent reviews, its real-world performance remains unverified. For your hotel, which platform’s proven results resonate more with your operational priorities?
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich PMS with a track record of recent customer satisfaction, turn to Clock. The platform’s extensive feature set — including booking engine, channel management, POS, guest feedback, and online check-in — suits hotels aiming for operational automation and revenue growth. Its 63 recent reviews and 4.88/5 rating underscore its reliability and user satisfaction.
Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger chain or industry group seeking a broad, scalable platform that integrates multiple hospitality segments, Jonas Hospitality might appeal. However, the lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it difficult to assess its current performance. For immediate, measurable results, Clock is the safer, more tested choice.
Clock boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.73/5 based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward navigation. Support and onboarding are also rated highly at 4.71/5, and users report that the system speeds up daily operations, even during busy periods.
Jonas Hospitality, lacking recent reviews and detailed feedback, does not provide comparable user experience ratings. Its complexity and usability remain unverified, making it a riskier option if ease of adoption is critical. Edge: Clock.
Clock offers 49 unique features, including a booking engine, multi-currency support, channel management, POS, guest feedback, digital registration, online check-in/out, guest messaging, and detailed analytics. Its feature set covers every core aspect of hotel management and adds modules like automated reminders, integrated ID scanners, and real-time reporting.
Jonas Hospitality, with no detailed feature count or specific offerings listed, appears less comprehensive. Its platform likely includes basic property management functions but may lack the depth and variety of Clock’s extensive toolkit. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s support team is highly rated at 4.78/5, with reviewers highlighting responsiveness and helpfulness. Many users mention that support staff listen to customer needs and continuously improve the platform, which translates into smoother onboarding and ongoing assistance.
Jonas Hospitality, with no recent reviews or support ratings available, cannot be confidently evaluated. The absence of recent user feedback means you cannot gauge the quality or responsiveness of their support team. Edge: Clock.
Clock boasts 111 verified partners, offering extensive integration options with OTAs, CRS, revenue management tools, and more. Shared integrations include major players like SiteMinder, Revinate, and IDeaS, with Clock also providing integrations with niche providers like Flexipass Keyless and Clock’s own booking engine.
Jonas Hospitality has 28 verified partners, including industry giants like Oracle Hospitality and Amadeus, but its integrations are fewer and less diverse. The broader partner ecosystem of Clock offers more flexibility and future-proofing for your hotel. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s recent reviews reflect a high overall rating of 4.88/5, with a 95% likelihood of recommendation, especially among boutique, city center, and independent hotels. Reviewers emphasize its ease of use, support quality, and positive revenue impact, with some praising its role in automating daily operations.
Jonas Hospitality has no recent reviews, leaving its user ratings and satisfaction levels unverified. Without recent feedback, it’s impossible to determine which platform hoteliers prefer. For proven satisfaction, Clock leads confidently. Edge: Clock.
Clock’s pricing starts at $600 per month, with no implementation or trial fees, and no additional charges for API access or integrations. Its transparent pricing model makes budgeting straightforward.
Jonas Hospitality’s pricing details are not publicly available, and no trial information is provided. The lack of transparency complicates cost comparison, but the absence of recent reviews and detailed pricing suggests Clock offers clearer value. Edge: Clock.
Not ideal if you prefer a minimal, simplified solution or operate a small property with basic needs. Also, if your hotel is in a region where localization or specific integrations are critical and not supported by Clock, it might require additional evaluation.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a proven, recent, and highly-reviewed system with extensive user feedback. Small or boutique hotels seeking immediate operational improvements may find the lack of recent reviews and detailed features limiting.
Clock offers a comprehensive, feature-rich hotel management system with recent reviews and high user ratings. Its focus on automation, integrations, and revenue optimization makes it suitable for hotels seeking tangible operational improvements today.
If your hotel needs a proven, well-supported platform with extensive functionalities, go with Clock. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores confirm its reliability and ability to meet diverse hotel demands.
Jonas Hospitality, despite its industry scope, lacks recent performance data and detailed feature information. Its platform may fit large, multi-property operations once more reviews and user feedback are available.
Choose Clock if you value proven results and comprehensive support. Opt for Jonas Hospitality only if you’re confident in its potential and can verify its performance in your context.
Os precos de Software de Gestão Hoteleira raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Clock HMS e Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gerente de canal | ||
| Inteligência de preços | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Ponto de venda | ||
| Sistema de Gestão de Propriedades |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 37 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 2 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"Faster processes, faster training, more time for staff to focus on the guests, and tasks that used to be done manually are now automated."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage ta... Clock PMS+ is widely praised for its intuitive interface and accessibility across various devices, making it easy for hotel staff to use and manage tasks efficiently. Several reviews highlighted the ability to access the system from anywhere as a key benefit. The platform's user-friendly design is especially beneficial for new staff training.
Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy re... Users appreciate the effectiveness of the reservation and booking management system, noting it as quick and seamless. The interface allows for easy reservation management and integrates with channel managers, enabling automatic booking imports, which helps in maintaining real-time availability and reducing manual entry errors.
O Clock PMS+ oferece suporte ao cliente confiável, reconhecido pela assistência rápida e eficiente. Embora geralmente elogiado, há relatos de orientaç... O Clock PMS+ oferece suporte ao cliente confiável, reconhecido pela assistência rápida e eficiente. Embora geralmente elogiado, há relatos de orientações incorretas ocasionais e da necessidade de aconselhamento especializado. Os usuários sugerem melhorias na orientação intuitiva e no suporte para funcionalidades complexas.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o Clock PMS+ atenda às necessidades básicas de análise, muitos usuários manifestam o desejo por relatórios aprimorados e personalizáveis. Isso... Embora o Clock PMS+ atenda às necessidades básicas de análise, muitos usuários manifestam o desejo por relatórios aprimorados e personalizáveis. Isso inclui a integração com o Excel e o fornecimento de análises financeiras e métricas operacionais mais detalhadas. Alguns usuários consideram os relatórios existentes inadequados e complexos para a obtenção de insights abrangentes.
Os usuários manifestaram interesse em mais opções de personalização e configurações flexíveis para atender às necessidades específicas de cada hotel.... Os usuários manifestaram interesse em mais opções de personalização e configurações flexíveis para atender às necessidades específicas de cada hotel. Embora, em geral, estejam satisfeitos, alguns usuários expressaram o desejo de modificar relatórios e configurações de interface para melhor suportar operações dinâmicas e estratégias de marketing.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Clock HMS e Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Management Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Clock HMS oferece 111 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform oferece 28. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Clock HMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Clock HMS: Nao. Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Management Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Clock tem um HT Score de 79 e Jonas Hospitality tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos