The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 1,414 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Cloudbeds se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.5/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile optimized/responsive and Revenue management module.
Slique se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 1,414 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $500/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 1,414 | 0 |
Apos analisar 1,414 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Cloudbeds mais valorizam intuitiveness and ease of use, automation and efficiency, reservations and channel management, enquanto os usuarios do Slique destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Intuitiveness and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Reservation Flexibility and Editing
▾
|
|
|
−
Conversão de Moedas e Operações Financeiras
▾
|
|
|
−
Funcionalidade móvel
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de Gestão Hoteleira para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #2 675 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 235 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #1 51 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #4 5 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 546 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 245 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 145 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #2 96 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #2 532 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #4 166 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #3 201 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #3 13 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds HMS by Cloudbeds and sliQue GRM by Slique ultimately hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Cloudbeds addresses the core challenges of hotel management—reservation, distribution, and guest experience—within a unified platform, whereas sliQue's DataBarn centers on data-driven insights and automation tailored more toward real estate and property management sectors. How do these different focuses align with your hotel's goals?
If your team seeks an established, feature-rich management system with widespread industry adoption, Cloudbeds is the more proven choice. Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customizable, automation-driven platform with advanced analytics, sliQue could appeal—though its hotel-specific capabilities are less mature.
Cloudbeds is designed specifically for hotels, offering a broad suite of functionalities like reservation management, channel distribution, guest communication, and revenue tools. sliQue’s DataBarn platform is more generalized, integrating robotics, IoT, and data analytics, primarily suited for real estate or property portfolios—not specifically tailored for hotel operations.
Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—over 85 unique functionalities—supports daily hotel tasks, while sliQue’s focus on automation and analytics, despite its impressive technological scope, lacks dedicated hotel modules. Would your hotel benefit more from an all-in-one PMS built for hospitality or from a flexible, tech-centric platform with a broader industrial focus?
Cloudbeds boasts a user rating of 4.58/5 for ease of use, with over 1,200 reviews and recent feedback highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and staff-friendly design. Users frequently mention how even less tech-savvy team members find it accessible, and onboarding averages 4.41/5—indicative of a smooth setup.
sliQue’s DataBarn, however, is a complex platform designed for technical teams managing multiple systems and devices. With only five employees, sliQue’s interface appears less tailored for front-line hotel staff, and its usability for non-technical users remains untested in the hospitality space. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds offers an expansive feature library—85 exclusive hotel features like PMS connectivity, inventory management, multi-currency, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and guest messaging. It also supports unlimited channels and custom rates, making daily operations more efficient.
sliQue’s DataBarn provides advanced IoT integration, real-time data analytics, and automation capabilities, but these are not hotel-specific and lack the breadth of features necessary for hotel management. For hotel-focused functionalities, Cloudbeds’s dedicated modules clearly outperform sliQue’s industrial tech. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds maintains a customer support rating of 4.38/5, with reviews praising its quick, friendly, and professional service. Users appreciate the responsive support team, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, with many citing timely responses and ongoing assistance.
sliQue, with a tiny team of five, offers limited support infrastructure—no publicly available review data or customer testimonials highlight its support quality in the hotel context. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive user base and recent reviews, its support system is more reliable and proven. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds has established partnerships with over 190 verified technology providers, including major OTAs, POS systems, and revenue management tools, enabling seamless data synchronization. It supports integrations like HotelTime, Sirvoy, HiJiffy, and even Oracle Hospitality, covering most hotel needs.
sliQue’s DataBarn offers IoT and automation integrations, but with only one verified partner—Oracle Hospitality—its ecosystem is limited. For comprehensive, hotel-specific integrations, Cloudbeds’s extensive partner network is far superior. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s 4.62/5 overall rating, with recent reviews from over 1,200 users, demonstrates broad satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and resorts. Users emphasize its ease of use, reliable support, and effect on revenue growth.
sliQue’s ratings are unavailable due to lack of hotel-specific reviews, making it difficult to evaluate hoteliers’ satisfaction. Given the current data, Cloudbeds’s reputation among hoteliers remains unmatched. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s baseline pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its enterprise-grade nature. sliQue’s DataBarn does not publicly list pricing, but given its industrial focus, costs are likely customized based on system complexity and integrations.
Cloudbeds’s transparent pricing allows for better budgeting, while sliQue’s custom quotes require direct contact. For most hotels, Cloudbeds’s predictable fee structure offers clearer value. Edge: Cloudbeds.
Not ideal if your property relies heavily on custom automation or IoT device integration outside hospitality, as Cloudbeds primarily focuses on hotel management features rather than industrial automation.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a dedicated PMS, reservation engine, or direct guest communication tools—sliQue’s platform is better suited to industrial or property management sectors outside hospitality.
Cloudbeds and sliQue serve fundamentally different needs. Cloudbeds is a proven, hotel-specific platform that simplifies operations, enhances guest experiences, and scales with your property. sliQue’s DataBarn offers powerful automation and analytics, but more suited for industrial applications and real estate management.
If your hotel needs an integrated, easy-to-use management system with proven support, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. For properties seeking advanced automation and data insights—particularly in non-hospitality sectors—sliQue may be more suitable, albeit with less hotel-specific functionality.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want a reliable, feature-rich platform built for hotels, with extensive integrations and a strong reputation. Opt for sliQue if your property management is heavily automation-driven and your team has the technical capacity to implement a broader industrial tech stack.
In conclusion, for the average hotelier, Cloudbeds’s current review count, recent feedback, and comprehensive hotel focus make it the more dependable and scalable choice.
Os precos de Software de Gestão Hoteleira raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Cloudbeds HMS e sliQue GRM compartilham 5 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Conectividade PMS | ||
| Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções | ||
| Gestão de inventário | ||
| Integrações bidirecionais em tempo real | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Painel de análise |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 73 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel ma... Cloudbeds is consistently praised for its user-friendly interface, which helps quick onboarding and reduces training times. Even users new to hotel management software find it intuitive, making operations smoother and more consistent for staff across the board.
The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not... The platform's automation tools significantly enhance daily operations, automating repetitive tasks like rate updates and payment processing. This not only saves time but also minimizes human errors, resulting in increased productivity and a focus on improving guest experiences.
Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appr... Cloudbeds excels in integrating reservations and channel management, centralizing OTA distributions while reducing overbookings and errors. Users appreciate the streamlined handling of bookings and distribution, which boosts operational efficiency and helps in maintaining optimal occupancy rates.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting... The ability to edit and restructure reservations is seen as area for improvement, with users desiring more flexibility. Suggestions include splitting bookings or rearranging stays, which would better accommodate real-time changes such as guest extensions or cancellations.
Há preocupações quanto à precisão da conversão de moedas, especialmente em operações com múltiplas moedas. Os usuários destacaram discrepâncias que af... Há preocupações quanto à precisão da conversão de moedas, especialmente em operações com múltiplas moedas. Os usuários destacaram discrepâncias que afetam os processos de conciliação. Configurações aprimoradas para conversão de moedas poderiam simplificar a gestão financeira.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Cloudbeds HMS e sliQue GRM compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Management Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Cloudbeds HMS oferece 189 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto sliQue GRM oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Cloudbeds HMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Cloudbeds HMS: Nao. sliQue GRM: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Management Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Cloudbeds tem um HT Score de 100 e Slique tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos