Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) vs. SiteMinder (The Channel Manager): Qual é o Ideal para Você?

Atualizado em September 19, 2026  ·  4,184 avaliações verificadas analisadas

TLDR

Analisamos 4,184 avaliações verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos conjuntos de funcionalidades, preços e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo de hotel e das suas prioridades:

Cloudbeds se destaca quando se trata de ease of use and fast onboarding — especialmente no segmento independent (4.5/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Centralized user & role management and Multi-Currency Support.

SiteMinder se destaca quando se trata de support responsiveness and problem solving — especialmente no segmento Other (5.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Performance Reporting.

Veja a análise completa abaixo ↓

Como Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) se Compara a SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)?

Avaliações lado a lado baseadas em 4,184 avaliações verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.

HTScore
98
100
Probabilidade de Recomendar
92%
93%
Facilidade de Uso
4.6/5
4.7/5
Suporte ao Cliente
4.4/5
4.5/5
Custo-Benefício
4.3/5
4.4/5
Preço Inicial A partir de $200/mês A partir de $500/mês
Avaliações Verificadas 1,319 2,865

Quais São os Prós e Contras de Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) vs SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)?

Após analisar 4,184 avaliações verificadas, os usuários do Cloudbeds mais valorizam ease of use and fast onboarding, channel synchronization and ota connectivity, relatórios e análises, enquanto os usuários do SiteMinder destacam support responsiveness and problem solving, ease of use and intuitive workflow, real-time inventory and rate synchronization. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds SiteMinder SiteMinder
Prós
+ Ease of use and fast onboarding
+ Support responsiveness and problem solving
+ Channel synchronization and OTA connectivity
+ Ease of use and intuitive workflow
+ Relatórios e análises
+ Real-time inventory and rate synchronization
+ Consolidação de plataforma tudo-em-um
+ Reporting and analytics
Contras
Gestão de reservas baseada em calendário
System speed and stability
Pagamentos, faturamento e fluxo de trabalho financeiro
Mapping and setup complexity
Responsividade do suporte ao hóspede
Mobile app limitations

Cloudbeds vs SiteMinder: Rankings por Segmento Hoteleiro

Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Gerentes de Canal para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regiões de hotéis — com base em avaliações verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.

Por Tamanho do Hotel

Segmento Cloudbeds Cloudbeds SiteMinder SiteMinder
Pequeno (10-24 quartos) #3 572 avaliações #1 810 avaliações
Médio (25-74 quartos) #5 171 avaliações #1 1159 avaliações
Grande (75-199 quartos) #4 42 avaliações #1 339 avaliações
Extra Grande (200+ quartos) #11 4 avaliações #1 177 avaliações

Por Tipo de Hotel

Segmento Cloudbeds Cloudbeds SiteMinder SiteMinder
Boutique #2 484 avaliações #1 1108 avaliações
Luxo #4 213 avaliações #1 914 avaliações
Rede / Cadeia #4 108 avaliações #1 639 avaliações
Estadia Prolongada #2 92 avaliações #1 356 avaliações

Por Região

Segmento Cloudbeds Cloudbeds SiteMinder SiteMinder
América do Norte #1 405 avaliações #2 283 avaliações
Europa #4 183 avaliações #1 614 avaliações
Ásia-Pacífico #4 231 avaliações #1 1021 avaliações
Oriente Médio #6 14 avaliações #4 41 avaliações

The Decision

Choosing a channel manager is critical to your hotel’s success in a highly competitive online market. Both Cloudbeds Myallocator and SiteMinder promise to streamline distribution, reduce overbookings, and maximize revenue, but their differences in scale, features, and user experience can influence your decision. As you evaluate, consider which platform aligns best with your property size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions.

Cloudbeds and SiteMinder are leading options, but with more recent reviews and a higher review count, Cloudbeds’ Myallocator is the more data-backed choice. Does that make it the clear winner for your hotel?

Is Cloudbeds or SiteMinder Better for Hotels?

Both platforms aim to simplify multi-channel distribution and prevent overbookings by synchronizing rates and availability in real-time. While Cloudbeds emphasizes its all-in-one platform tying together PMS, booking engine, and channel management, SiteMinder leans heavily on its extensive network of over 450 booking channels and integrations with more than 350 PMS and RMS systems.

Cloudbeds’s reviews focus on its intuitive interface, AI-driven insights, and unified system, but some users report occasional speed issues and limited website customization. In contrast, SiteMinder’s strength lies in its extensive global reach and proven scalability, yet some users mention slower support during busy periods.

Given that SiteMinder has more recent reviews and a larger user base, it signals ongoing active development and a broader industry presence. Are you looking for a platform with proven global connectivity or an integrated all-in-one system?

Cloudbeds vs SiteMinder: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a small to mid-sized independent property or a boutique, Cloudbeds offers a straightforward, user-friendly solution that consolidates operations into one platform—especially appealing if you want to reduce complexity. Cloudbeds is also ideal if your team prefers AI-powered insights for dynamic pricing and revenue forecasting.

Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger chain or you need to reach a vast array of international channels, SiteMinder’s extensive network and real-time synchronization across 450+ channels make it the more suitable choice. It’s particularly advantageous if you require multi-property management, advanced analytics, and broad global distribution.

For hoteliers emphasizing ease of use and comprehensive reporting, Cloudbeds’s recent reviews show a slight edge. For those prioritizing channel breadth and scalability, SiteMinder’s more extensive partner ecosystem is compelling.

Is Cloudbeds or SiteMinder Easier to Use?

Cloudbeds’s interface scores a 4.6/5, with many users praising its intuitive dashboard, straightforward setup, and minimal training requirements. The onboarding process is generally smooth, with some noting that advanced features may require additional support but overall find it accessible.

SiteMinder’s UI is similarly rated at 4.66/5, with users appreciating its modern design, clear menu tabs, and quick rate updates. While initial setup can take longer due to the need to configure multiple channels, experienced users find it manageable, especially with its helpful onboarding resources.

Edge: Cloudbeds, for its slightly more intuitive and beginner-friendly user experience.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or SiteMinder?

Cloudbeds offers 14 shared features with its platform, including multi-currency support, weekly & monthly rates, and centralized user management. Unique features in Cloudbeds include its AI Signals for demand forecasting, and an integrated booking engine that keeps everything in one place.

SiteMinder boasts six features exclusive to its platform, such as performance reporting, rate intelligence, and an open API for custom integrations. Its strengths are in its extensive channel connectivity, real-time rate updates, and dynamic pricing capabilities.

Overall, Cloudbeds’s superior feature count and integrated solutions give it an edge for properties seeking a unified system. Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or SiteMinder?

Cloudbeds maintains a support rating of 4.41/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, helpful service and dedicated onboarding support—though some mention delays during peak times. One review notes, "Cloudbeds customer care is attentive and quick to respond when issues arise."

SiteMinder’s support scores slightly higher at 4.48/5, with many users praising its friendly and efficient support team. Customers appreciate the availability of multilingual support and quick resolution times, though some call for faster response during busy seasons.

Edge: SiteMinder, for its marginally higher support rating and global support presence.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or SiteMinder?

Cloudbeds has an overall rating of 4.64/5 from 1,062 reviews, with a recent review count of 75 in the last six months. Its users are primarily independent hotels, boutique properties, and hostels, with many praising its ease of use and all-in-one platform.

SiteMinder’s overall rating is 4.55/5 from 2,453 reviews, with 141 recent reviews. Its users span large hotel groups and chains, especially in international markets, with high marks for channel breadth and distribution efficiency.

Considering the recent review volume and higher overall score, Cloudbeds’s reputation among smaller and independent hotels is notably strong. Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and SiteMinder Cost?

Cloudbeds charges a base price of $200/month, with no freemium or pay-per-room options, making it straightforward for small to mid-sized hotels. The pricing appears transparent, with no implementation fees or trial options available.

SiteMinder’s base price is $500/month, also without free tiers or per-room charges, positioning it as a premium solution suitable for larger operations. Its higher cost reflects its broader channel reach and advanced features.

If budget is a concern, Cloudbeds offers more accessible pricing; for extensive channel distribution and scalability, SiteMinder’s premium position might justify the investment.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

Hotels that should consider Cloudbeds include:

  • Independents seeking an all-in-one platform
  • Boutique hotels wanting simplified management
  • Hostels and budget properties prioritizing ease of use
  • Small chains aiming for scalable, central control
  • Properties with limited IT resources needing intuitive tools

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel requires extensive multi-channel connectivity beyond what Cloudbeds offers
  • You need advanced, customizable analytics
  • Over-the-top website customization is a priority
  • You operate a large international hotel chain needing complex distribution

Cloudbeds suits properties focused on efficiency and ease, especially those with fewer channels or multi-property needs but less reliance on extensive third-party integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use SiteMinder?

Hotels that should choose SiteMinder include:

  • Large hotels or chains with extensive distribution needs
  • Properties targeting international markets through diverse channels
  • Hotels needing advanced performance analytics and rate intelligence
  • Multi-property operators managing multiple brands
  • Hotels seeking broad global reach with over 450 channels

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel is small or independent with simple needs
  • You prefer an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, booking engine, and channel management
  • You need a highly customizable website experience
  • Your focus is on automation for smaller operations

SiteMinder’s strengths are in its vast distribution network and scalability, making it ideal for growth-oriented, multi-property hotels.

The Bottom Line for Hotels: Which Channel Manager Wins?

Cloudbeds offers an integrated, user-friendly platform with a strong emphasis on AI-driven insights and ease of use. Its extensive review volume and recent feedback indicate a reliable choice for independent and boutique hotels seeking simplicity and scalability.

SiteMinder provides unmatched global reach, broad channel connectivity, and advanced analytics, making it well-suited for larger properties and hotel groups aiming for aggressive distribution and revenue growth.

If your hotel is smaller, values intuitive design, and prefers an all-in-one approach, Cloudbeds is the better fit. For larger, international operations with complex distribution needs, SiteMinder’s comprehensive network and features give it the edge.

Final Verdict: Given the larger number of recent reviews and a higher overall rating, Cloudbeds Myallocator is the stronger recommendation for most hotels today. Its user-friendly design, all-in-one platform, and proven performance make it a reliable choice for hoteliers ready to grow.

Quanto Custam Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) e SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)?

Os preços de Gerentes de Canal raramente são simples. Aqui está o que sabemos com base nos dados públicos de preços de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotação personalizada para o tamanho do seu hotel.

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds SiteMinder SiteMinder
Preço Inicial A partir de $200/mês A partir de $500/mês

Comparação de funcionalidades: Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) vs SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)

Estas são as funcionalidades que cada fornecedor configurou, organizadas por grupo de funcionalidades — os mesmos dados mostrados no painel do fornecedor. Expanda um grupo para comparar as funcionalidades lado a lado.

Recurso Cloudbeds Cloudbeds SiteMinder SiteMinder
Gerenciamento de taxa
100%
80%
Suporte para tarifas semanais e mensais
Regras de rendimento
Taxas derivadas
Gestão de inventário
Grade de inventário
Mapeamento de tipo de quarto
100%
100%
Automapeamento de canal
Automação e sincronização
100%
100%
Atualizações em massa e várias restrições
Integrações bidirecionais em tempo real
Conectividade PMS
Administração e configurações
100%
80%
Multilíngue
Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções
Suporte a várias moedas
Grade de inventário
Processamento de Pagamento Integrado
Análise e relatórios
100%
100%
Painel de análise
Relatório de desempenho de reservas e ritmo
Other
100%
100%
Canais Ilimitados (sem custo adicional)

Resultados Reais: Cloudbeds vs SiteMinder por Objetivo de Negócio

Analisamos 16 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hotéis realmente alcançam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negócio principais.

Aumentar Receita e Reduzir Custos
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas Médio
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
SiteMinder Fuli Hot Spring Resort Grande
+ 60% increased bookings
+ Save up to 100 hours of work per month
+ Higher occupancy rates

"The benefit of implementing technology like SiteMinder is that the benefits show themselves almost immediately, with time saved and increased revenue."

Sun Tseng
Sun Tseng
Reservation Assistant Manager
Aumentar Eficiência Operacional
Cloudbeds Flor Parks Pequeno
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
SiteMinder Bali Garden Beach Resort Grande
+ SiteMinder updates in real-time.
+ Increasing bookings by 10 to 50 percent.
+ Less overbookings

"SiteMinder allows effective working time for all our teams, both in Sales and Marketing."

Kadek Wawan
Kadek Wawan
IT & Webmaster
Melhorar a Experiência do Hóspede
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne Pequeno
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
SiteMinder The RuMa Hotel & Residences Grande
+ 2-4 hours daily savings by reducing manual execution on pricing strategy
+ It works effectively and efficiently, and when market demand fluctuates we are able to change our pricing strategy in a timely manner, to optimise the business opportunity
+ Free up time for our guests

"Knowing that hoteliers are facing new challenges each year, SiteMinder always strives to improve its features and introduce new products - so properties can continue enjoying resul..."

Annie Hong
Annie Hong
Revenue and Reservations Manager

Cloudbeds vs SiteMinder: Conclusão Final

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 de 1,319 avaliações

O que os hoteleiros adoram

Ease of use and fast onboarding 85% positivo

Many reviewers describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and simple to teach to staff, which lowers training time and helps small teams adopt it... Many reviewers describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, easy to learn, and simple to teach to staff, which lowers training time and helps small teams adopt it quickly. This ease of use is often tied to operational efficiency, especially for independent hotels and guesthouses that want a system staff can handle without heavy technical knowledge.

Channel synchronization and OTA connectivity 85% positivo

Users repeatedly say Cloudbeds keeps inventory and rates synced across major OTAs, reducing double bookings, rate mismatches, and manual updates. This... Users repeatedly say Cloudbeds keeps inventory and rates synced across major OTAs, reducing double bookings, rate mismatches, and manual updates. This is one of the clearest value drivers in the reviews because it improves distribution accuracy and frees staff time.

Relatórios e análises 65% positivo

Relatórios são uma das forças mais valorizadas da Cloudbeds, especialmente para ocupação, receita, desempenho de canais e análise ano a ano. Ao mesmo... Relatórios são uma das forças mais valorizadas da Cloudbeds, especialmente para ocupação, receita, desempenho de canais e análise ano a ano. Ao mesmo tempo, muitos usuários desejam painéis mais modernos, downloads mais rápidos e melhor personalização para que os relatórios sejam mais fáceis de usar para decisões gerenciais.

Onde os hoteleiros criticam

Gestão de reservas baseada em calendário 42% negativo

A visualização do calendário é amplamente elogiada por facilitar a compreensão, atualização e gerenciamento de reservas dia a dia. Os avaliadores valo... A visualização do calendário é amplamente elogiada por facilitar a compreensão, atualização e gerenciamento de reservas dia a dia. Os avaliadores valorizam-na por acelerar os fluxos de trabalho da recepção, acompanhar a ocupação e lidar com tarefas como reservas divididas, atribuição de quartos e notas diretamente na visualização do cronograma.

Pagamentos, faturamento e fluxo de trabalho financeiro 53% negativo

Os usuários gostam do gerenciamento de pagamentos integrado do Cloudbeds, das transações no folio e da criação de faturas/recibos porque eles simplifi... Os usuários gostam do gerenciamento de pagamentos integrado do Cloudbeds, das transações no folio e da criação de faturas/recibos porque eles simplificam o checkout e reduzem o trabalho de back-office. No entanto, várias avaliações solicitam integrações de pagamento locais mais robustas, faturamento compatível com impostos, orçamentos editáveis e fluxos de faturamento mais flexíveis para diferentes mercados.

Melhor classificado em

BR #1 vs #8
EG #3 vs #6
IN #5 vs #7
JP #1 vs #3

Capacidades exclusivas

Gerenciamento centralizado de usuários e funções Suporte a várias moedas Suporte para tarifas semanais e mensais
4.6/5 facilidade de uso 4.4/5 suporte 199 integrações
Visitar Site
SiteMinder
SiteMinder
4.7/5 de 2,865 avaliações

O que os hoteleiros adoram

Support responsiveness and problem solving 71% positivo

Support quality is one of the most frequently mentioned strengths, with users praising fast response times, knowledgeable agents, and clear troublesho... Support quality is one of the most frequently mentioned strengths, with users praising fast response times, knowledgeable agents, and clear troubleshooting. For hotels, this means faster recovery from distribution problems and less operational disruption when urgent issues arise.

Ease of use and intuitive workflow 89% positivo

Many reviewers describe SiteMinder as easy to learn, intuitive, and practical for day-to-day hotel operations. This simplicity matters because it help... Many reviewers describe SiteMinder as easy to learn, intuitive, and practical for day-to-day hotel operations. This simplicity matters because it helps front-office and revenue teams manage channels quickly without heavy training.

Real-time inventory and rate synchronization 82% positivo

Users repeatedly say SiteMinder updates availability and rates across OTAs quickly, reducing manual work and booking errors. This real-time sync is vi... Users repeatedly say SiteMinder updates availability and rates across OTAs quickly, reducing manual work and booking errors. This real-time sync is viewed as core to preventing overbookings and keeping distribution accurate during busy periods.

Onde os hoteleiros criticam

System speed and stability 57% negativo

While generally reliable, some users report slow loading, delays during heavy updates, or occasional freezes after updates. For hotels, this matters b... While generally reliable, some users report slow loading, delays during heavy updates, or occasional freezes after updates. For hotels, this matters because speed directly affects how quickly inventory and pricing changes reach channels during high-demand periods.

Mapping and setup complexity 56% negativo

A recurring pain point is that mapping rate plans, room types, and channels can be time-consuming or confusing, especially for new properties or compl... A recurring pain point is that mapping rate plans, room types, and channels can be time-consuming or confusing, especially for new properties or complex portfolios. Reviewers want bulk mapping, easier setup, and fewer manual steps to speed onboarding and reduce configuration errors.

Melhor classificado em

Grande (75-199 quartos) #1 vs #4
Médio (25-74 quartos) #1 vs #5
Pequeno (10-24 quartos) #1 vs #3
Extra Grande (200+ quartos) #1 vs #11

Capacidades exclusivas

Filtragem de tipo de quarto e tarifa Filtros de compras de taxa rápida Relatório de desempenho Taxa de inteligência Comparação da tarifa do quarto
4.7/5 facilidade de uso 4.5/5 suporte 247 integrações
Visitar Site

Perguntas Frequentes Sobre Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) vs SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) pode substituir SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)?

Depende dos seus requisitos. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) e SiteMinder (The Channel Manager) compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Channel Managers, mas cada um tem capacidades únicas. Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) oferece 199 parceiros de integração verificados, enquanto SiteMinder (The Channel Manager) oferece 247. Revise a comparação de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.

Qual é melhor para hotéis pequenos ou independentes?

Hotéis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rápido. SiteMinder (The Channel Manager) lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Procure preços transparentes e opção de teste ou demonstração. Filtre as avaliações na página de cada produto por tamanho de hotel para ouvir hotéis como o seu.

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) ou SiteMinder (The Channel Manager) oferecem um plano gratuito?

Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator): Não. SiteMinder (The Channel Manager): Não. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Channel Managers oferece demonstrações ou períodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.

Como o HTR Avalia e Classifica Cloudbeds Channel Manager (myallocator) e SiteMinder (The Channel Manager)?

O HT Score é um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de critérios e mais de uma dúzia de variáveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Cloudbeds tem um HT Score de 98 e SiteMinder tem 100. Veja como a pontuação é calculada.

Grupo de Critérios Peso O Que Mede
Avaliações e Reviews de Clientes

O quanto os usuários recomendam este produto?

Pontuação de Avaliações, Volume de Reviews, Participação de Voz, Profundidade das Reviews, Recência das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso

O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliações médias de satisfação (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relação aos pares da categoria, recência das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos últimos 6 meses) e participação de voz entre clientes hoteleiros únicos para detectar viés de seleção.

Ecossistema de Parceiros

O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa?

Recomendações de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integrações, Qualidade das Integrações

Avalia recomendações de parceiros como votos de confiança de especialistas, o número de integrações verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a média dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integração. Produtos com ecossistemas de integração de maior qualidade têm mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnológica conectada.

Foco no Cliente

Qual o nível de foco no cliente desta organização?

Suporte Certificado, Consistência de Reviews, Completude do Perfil

Avalia se a empresa obteve a certificação HTR Customer Support, mantém coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantém perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, preços e funcionalidades.

Alcance, Solidez e Recursos

Qual a extensão do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa?

Alcance Geográfico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuação de Tendência

Mede a presença global (países e regiões atendidos), anos de operação como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuação de tendência baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendações de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos últimos doze meses.

As avaliações e reviews de clientes são, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR não aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews são verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliações confirmadas podem enviar avaliações. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →

Obtenha seu relatório gratuito de análise de IA

Recomendações personalizadas para o seu hotel.

Ghostel icon
Com a confiança de
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

Vamos pesquisar as informações do seu hotel