The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 43 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
DJUBO se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
GuestCentric se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 43 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 20 | 23 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de reservas de hotéis para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #7 5 avaliacoes | #3 9 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #16 0 avaliacoes | #7 5 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #9 0 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #12 0 avaliacoes | #6 1 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 avaliacoes | #4 11 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #11 2 avaliacoes | #7 8 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | #13 0 avaliacoes | #7 4 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #10 0 avaliacoes | #3 5 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #13 0 avaliacoes | #15 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #14 17 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #2 5 avaliacoes | #12 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | #11 0 avaliacoes | #10 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing between DJUBO and GuestCentric for your hotel’s reservations and management needs hinges on your operational complexity, regional focus, and feature priorities. Both products aim to streamline reservations, inventory, and revenue, but they do so differently. DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features and a strong global presence, while GuestCentric emphasizes a user-friendly CRS with a focus on direct booking growth. Which aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both DJUBO and GuestCentric cater to hotels seeking to centralize reservations and operational management. DJUBO’s platform integrates PMS, channel management, POS, revenue, and guest feedback modules—effectively replacing several systems with one. GuestCentric, on the other hand, specializes in a CRS and booking engine designed to maximize direct bookings and simplify inventory management.
While DJUBO boasts a wide-ranging feature set—30 unique features—GuestCentric offers a streamlined interface with fewer features but a focus on conversion-driven reservations. DJUBO’s platform is more suited for hotels needing an all-in-one solution across multiple operational facets, especially if regional coverage in Asia, Africa, or North America is critical. GuestCentric excels in providing a highly rated CRS with strong customer support and is preferred by boutique and city center hotels.
The core divergence lies in scope versus specialization. DJUBO’s broad feature set makes it an ideal choice for hotels seeking comprehensive management under one roof. GuestCentric’s targeted reservation system is better if your hotel prioritizes direct bookings and ease of use.
Are you looking for a complete management platform or a focused CRS to boost direct reservations?
If your hotel needs a full-stack hospitality platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 20 reviews in the last six months, with a 5/5 overall rating, reflect a high level of satisfaction among users of various property types, especially independent hotels in Asia Pacific and North America.
Conversely, if you require a user-friendly CRS and booking engine primarily for increasing direct reservations, GuestCentric’s platform, with 19 recent reviews and a 4.75/5 rating, is preferable. It is particularly favored by boutique hotels and city center properties, emphasizing ease of use and customer support.
For multi-property operations or hotels needing integrated management, DJUBO’s extensive features and regional coverage make it the better fit. For smaller properties or those emphasizing direct bookings with a simple interface, GuestCentric is a more targeted solution.
Would your hotel benefit from a complete operational system or a focused reservation engine?
Both products score nearly identically on ease of use—DJUBO at 4.65/5 and GuestCentric at 4.66/5—indicating that users find both platforms intuitive. DJUBO’s interface is praised for its look and feel, particularly its mobile app, with reviews highlighting its practicality for multi-property management.
GuestCentric’s platform is lauded for being highly user-friendly, reducing clicks and simplifying the reservation process, especially appreciated by smaller teams or boutique hotels. Training and onboarding are rated similarly, at approximately 4.57/5, with some reviewers noting a need for clearer communication during setup.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO’s platform includes 30 unique features, covering channel management, multi-currency, PMS, POS, revenue management, guest feedback, and advanced rate shopping. It offers modules that support group bookings, housecleaning, metasearch connectivity, and mobile apps—making it a robust, all-in-one solution.
GuestCentric’s CRS does not list additional features beyond its core reservation and booking engine, focusing on direct reservation conversion and inventory management. Its core strength is the booking engine and website integration, but it doesn’t provide the extensive modules DJUBO offers.
Edge: DJUBO.
GuestCentric’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially for larger properties or those needing quick resolutions. Users frequently praise its friendly and competent team, with consistent praise for solving issues promptly.
DJUBO’s support, rated at 4.63/5, is also well-reviewed, with comments noting responsive, helpful service. However, some reviews suggest reporting could be more robust, and additional customization options would be beneficial.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric integrates with 44 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, payment gateways, and distribution channels—making it highly flexible for larger, complex properties. Its integrations include platforms like Omnibees, WebRezPro, and yieldPlanet, alongside shared partners like Tripadvisor.
DJUBO’s integration pool is narrower, with 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but it covers core needs like channel management and PMS connectivity. Its fewer integrations may limit flexibility for properties relying on diverse third-party tools.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO has a 5/5 overall rating from 20 recent reviews, primarily from independent hotels and properties across Asia Pacific and North America. Reviewers praise its comprehensive management features and cost-effectiveness, with many emphasizing its suitability for multi-property operations.
GuestCentric boasts a 4.75/5 rating from 19 recent reviews, with a majority from boutique and city center hotels. Customers commend its ease of use, customer support, and effective reservation system.
Overall, DJUBO’s higher review count and recent ratings tilt the scales in its favor, indicating broader hotel satisfaction across segments.
Edge: DJUBO.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, and neither offers a freemium or subscription model. They operate on custom quotes based on hotel size and feature needs, so costs can vary significantly.
Your team should request personalized quotes to compare total costs, considering the scope of features needed and support levels.
Not ideal if your hotel only requires a simple booking engine or minimal operational management.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive management modules or operates across multiple regions with complex distribution needs.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with a broad feature set, suited for hotels seeking operational integration and multi-property management. Its higher review count and recent ratings confirm its strong position in the market, especially for independently operated properties.
GuestCentric excels as a CRS with a focus on direct reservations, high customer support ratings, and ease of use, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties emphasizing online booking growth. Its extensive integrations are advantageous if your hotel relies on multiple third-party partners.
If your property needs a robust, full-featured management system with regional coverage, DJUBO is the better choice. For hotels focused on boosting direct reservations with minimal operational fuss, GuestCentric remains a compelling option.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating between these two, DJUBO’s broader capabilities and recent review momentum tip the scales in its favor.
Os precos de Software de reservas de hotéis raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|---|
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Djubo (CRS) e GuestCentric CRS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Gerenciamento de canais e distribuição OTA | ||
| Gerente de canal | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Sistema de Gestão de Propriedades |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 18 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Depende dos seus requisitos. Djubo (CRS) e GuestCentric CRS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel Reservations Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Djubo (CRS) oferece 3 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto GuestCentric CRS oferece 44. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Djubo (CRS) lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.6/5 vs 4.6/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Djubo (CRS): Nao. GuestCentric CRS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel Reservations Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. DJUBO tem um HT Score de 0 e GuestCentric tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos