The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
easyGuestmanagement se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do easyGuestmanagement mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between easyGuestmanagement GmbH's platform and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, scale, and user feedback. easyGuestmanagement offers a niche solution with no recent reviews or ratings, while Mews provides a robust, widely adopted platform with extensive real-world validation.
Given the differences, which system aligns better with your hotel’s current requirements and future plans?
easyGuestmanagement and Mews serve the same fundamental purpose—helping hotels manage reservations, billing, and guest communications. However, easyGuestmanagement's platform has no recent reviews or publicly visible ratings, which limits confidence in its current functionality and support. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews in the last six months alone, with a 4.62/5 rating, indicating high user satisfaction.
The critical difference is that Mews has proven its reliability through extensive user feedback, while easyGuestmanagement’s lack of recent reviews and zero score suggest limited recent adoption or validation. Do you want a system with proven performance and ongoing support?
If your hotel operates multiple properties, seeks extensive integrations, or plans to scale, Mews is the clear choice. Its 336 verified integrations, global presence in 54 countries, and dedicated support make it suitable for a broad range of hotel types, from boutique to large chains. Conversely, easyGuestmanagement’s limited feature set and lack of recent validation make it more suitable for very small, single-property operations that don’t require extensive customization or future growth.
If scalability, integrations, and proven performance matter to you, go with Mews. If you need a simple, local solution for a single property with minimal tech needs, easyGuestmanagement might suffice—but beware of limited support options.
Mews consistently earns high usability ratings—4.7/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, modern design, and straightforward onboarding. Users report that staff quickly adopt Mews due to its logical workflows and helpful training resources. In contrast, easyGuestmanagement has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user experience today.
Given Mews’ strong user satisfaction scores and recent positive feedback, it’s the more reliable choice for hotels prioritizing staff adoption and minimal training time. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, digital registration, housekeeping modules, payment processing, and a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. easyGuestmanagement, on the other hand, claims no exclusive features beyond basic reservation and billing functions, with no verified features listed.
The extensive feature set and third-party connectivity give Mews a significant advantage for hotels that want flexibility, automation, and innovation. Edge: Mews.
Mews supports its users with an average rating of 4.27/5, and many recent reviews highlight its responsive, helpful support team. Clients mention that Mews’ onboarding, training, and ongoing support are well-organized, with quick problem resolution.
easyGuestmanagement has no recent support ratings or reviews, which raises concerns about ongoing assistance or system updates. Without documented support quality, Mews remains the safer, more dependable option. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations with partners like Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and more, offering extensive customization. easyGuestmanagement lists zero verified partners or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or adapt to evolving tech stacks.
For hotels that rely on a broad ecosystem of tools—channel managers, revenue systems, or CRM—Mews clearly provides a more flexible, connected environment. Edge: Mews.
Mews’ reviews, primarily in the last six months, reflect high satisfaction across segments including boutique hotels, hostels, and city center properties, with an overall rating of 4.62/5. Many hoteliers praise its ease of use, reliability, and support.
easyGuestmanagement has no recent reviews or ratings, so no current hotel feedback validates its performance. Given the large volume and recency of Mews reviews, it’s the more trusted product among hotel operators today. Edge: Mews.
easyGuestmanagement does not publicly disclose pricing, making direct comparisons impossible. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its enterprise-grade positioning.
For budgeting purposes, Mews's transparent pricing aligns with its comprehensive feature set, but the lack of free trials or flexible plans may be a hurdle for smaller properties. No clear details are available for easyGuestmanagement’s costs.
Not ideal if your hotel aims to scale, needs multi-property management, or plans to expand technologically.
Not ideal if you operate a very small, low-tech property that only needs basic reservation functions.
Mews and easyGuestmanagement aim to simplify hotel operations but differ vastly in validation, features, and scope. easyGuestmanagement is practically unreviewed and likely limited in capability, making it unsuitable for hotels with ambitions to grow or integrate.
When choosing, consider your hotel’s size, growth plans, and technology needs. If you want a proven, feature-rich platform with extensive support and integrations, go with Mews. For a very small, single-property operation with minimal requirements, easyGuestmanagement might suffice—but proceed with caution.
If scalability and proven performance are priorities, Mews stands out as the clear choice.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| easyGuestmanagement |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, easyGuestmanagement GmbH e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | easyGuestmanagement |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. easyGuestmanagement GmbH e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. easyGuestmanagement GmbH oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 336. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
easyGuestmanagement GmbH: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. easyGuestmanagement tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 99. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos