The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 69 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
REPAY se destaca .
ROH se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (0.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 69 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 69 |
Apos analisar 69 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do REPAY mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do ROH destacam automation of payments and invoicing, interface amigável, treinamento e suporte. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| REPAY |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface amigável
▾
|
|
|
+
Treinamento e suporte
▾
|
|
|
+
Relatórios e notificações em tempo real
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Capacidades de integração
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | — | #3 2 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #4 13 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 21 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #2 25 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #2 34 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 28 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #3 4 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #2 61 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #3 1 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right payments processing software can significantly impact your hotel’s cash flow, operational efficiency, and overall guest experience. REPAY’s ePay and ROH both aim to simplify financial transactions, but their capabilities and market presence diverge sharply. While ePay has no current reviews or recent data, ROH boasts a robust review footprint and a high user recommendation rate, making it the more dependable choice for your hotel’s needs.
Both platforms address core payment processing issues—handling transactions, automating invoicing, and supporting multiple payment methods—but where do they truly stand apart? Do you prioritize ease of use, feature depth, or proven customer satisfaction? Let's dive into the details.
ePay and ROH tackle the same fundamental problem: making hotel payments faster, more secure, and easier to manage. ePay, developed by REPAY, offers a generic electronic payment processing service designed for various industries but lacks specific hotel features or a proven hotel-centric track record. Conversely, ROH specializes exclusively in the hospitality sector, with 19 unique features tailored to the needs of hotels, such as payment splitting, refunds, recurring payments, and PCI compliance.
Market presence and recent reviews heavily favor ROH. With 65 verified reviews and a recent review count of 10 in the past six months, ROH demonstrates ongoing customer engagement and trust. ePay, by comparison, has zero reviews and no recent data, making it difficult to assess its current performance or customer satisfaction. Given the importance of real-world feedback when making a purchasing decision, the evidence heavily leans toward ROH as the safer, more reliable choice.
In summary, while both platforms solve payment processing problems, only ROH provides recent, review-backed validation of its effectiveness in a hotel setting. Are you prepared to trust an unreviewed platform, or would you rather rely on a solution with proven hotel-specific success?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich payments platform tailored specifically for hospitality, go with ROH. It’s designed for hotels, offers 19 distinct features like refunds, payment splitting, and multi-platform payment acceptance, and is backed by 65 reviews with a 4.97/5 support rating.
If your team primarily requires a simple, generic payment processor without hotel-specific features, ePay might seem suitable—though with no reviews or recent feedback, confidence in its performance is limited. For hotels aiming to optimize cash flow through automation, real-time reporting, and integrated features, ROH is clearly the more strategic choice.
For property managers and revenue teams seeking automation, seamless invoicing, and detailed reporting, ROH offers a clear advantage. Conversely, if your focus is on basic transaction handling with minimal features, ePay’s lack of recent data makes it a risky option.
In conclusion, your decision should hinge on whether you value proven hotel-focused features and recent user feedback. If so, ROH is the better fit.
ROH by ROH scores a near-perfect 4.95/5 in ease of use, supported by rave reviews praising its intuitive, user-friendly interface. Hotel staff find it straightforward to process payments and manage invoices, with many reviewers noting it “makes my job so much easier” and “very easy to use.”
ePay by REPAY, however, has no current reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to reliably assess its usability despite its broad industry positioning. Without recent reviews or ratings, it’s likely that ePay’s ease of use remains untested in the hotel environment.
Edge: ROH
ROH offers 19 features tailored explicitly for hospitality, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, installments, and multiple payment methods like Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, Amex, and Discover. It also includes PCI compliance, chargeback management, and authorization adjustments—features that directly address hotel payment complexities.
ePay provides no listed features beyond basic payment processing, lacking the specialized tools necessary for managing complex hotel transactions. Its absence of hotel-specific functionalities is a significant limitation, especially considering the extensive capabilities ROH provides.
Therefore, for feature depth and hotel-specific tools, ROH holds a decisive edge.
Edge: ROH
ROH consistently receives support ratings near 5/5, with a user review praising its “great support staff” and “smooth onboarding experience” rated at 4.92/5. The platform’s recent reviews highlight ongoing satisfaction with customer service and training, essential for operational continuity.
ePay, with no reviews or support ratings available, leaves your team without concrete evidence of support quality. Relying on an unreviewed platform introduces risk if issues arise or onboarding challenges occur.
Edge: ROH
ROH integrates with Oracle Hospitality, providing one verified integration—suitable for many hotel environments seeking streamlined payment solutions tied to property management systems. ePay, however, has no verified integrations listed, suggesting limited or no hotel-specific system connections.
For hotels relying on integrated POS, PMS, or revenue management systems, ROH’s existing integration makes it more practical. The absence of integrations with ePay could hinder operational efficiency or require manual workarounds.
Edge: ROH
ROH’s 65 reviews with a 4.97/5 rating reflect high satisfaction across various hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, and resorts. Hotels consistently praise its ease of use, automation, and support.
ePay has no reviews or recent feedback, so there’s no way to gauge hotel satisfaction. The lack of user data makes it impossible to recommend ePay confidently.
Therefore, ROH’s high, recent review score makes it the clearly preferred option.
Edge: ROH
ePay’s pricing details are unavailable, with no information on subscription models or fees. ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly base price, with no additional implementation or per-room fees.
While ePay’s unknown pricing could be advantageous, the lack of transparency hampers comparison. ROH’s transparent fee structure facilitates budgeting and planning.
In summary, ROH’s clear pricing makes it easier to evaluate value. ePay’s costs remain uncertain.
Not ideal if:
Given the lack of recent reviews and features, ePay is best suited for basic, low-complexity payment needs.
Not ideal if:
ROH is ideal for hotels committed to streamlining their financial operations and improving cash flow.
ROH is a dedicated hospitality payments platform with 19 features, a proven track record, and recent high user satisfaction. Its focus on automation, integrations, and support makes it a reliable choice for hotels aiming to optimize their financial operations.
ePay by REPAY, while potentially suitable for simple, non-hotel-specific needs, lacks recent reviews, features, and integrations, making it a risky choice for hotels seeking reliability and growth.
If your hotel values proven performance, feature depth, and recent positive reviews, ROH is the clear winner. Conversely, if your needs are minimal and you’re seeking a low-cost, basic payment solution without hotel-specific features, ePay might suffice—though with caution due to the lack of recent data.
In conclusion, for most hotels, especially those looking to improve operational efficiency and cash flow, ROH offers the safer, more comprehensive solution.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| REPAY |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ePay e ROH compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | REPAY |
|
|---|---|---|
| Captura Parcial | ||
| Divisão de pagamento | ||
| Gestão de reembolso | ||
| Pagamentos recorrentes | ||
| Pague por Link | ||
| Pré-autorizações |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 7 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
A ROH é constantemente elogiada por sua interface intuitiva, de fácil utilização tanto para funcionários do hotel quanto para clientes. A plataforma s... A ROH é constantemente elogiada por sua interface intuitiva, de fácil utilização tanto para funcionários do hotel quanto para clientes. A plataforma simplifica o processo de fazer e receber pagamentos, resultando em uma experiência de transação mais tranquila e maior satisfação entre os usuários.
Os usuários apreciam o treinamento inicial e o suporte contínuo da ROH, ajudando a garantir uma adoção tranquila do software. Isso é particularmente b... Os usuários apreciam o treinamento inicial e o suporte contínuo da ROH, ajudando a garantir uma adoção tranquila do software. Isso é particularmente benéfico para integrar novos usuários ou responder a consultas complexas de forma eficaz.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Embora o ROH ofereça benefícios significativos em termos de economia de tempo, vários usuários sugeriram melhorias na integração com sistemas hoteleir... Embora o ROH ofereça benefícios significativos em termos de economia de tempo, vários usuários sugeriram melhorias na integração com sistemas hoteleiros existentes, como PMS e software de vendas, para uma eficiência ainda maior. Isso inclui possível integração com Salesforce, Delphi e Opera.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ePay e ROH compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ePay oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto ROH oferece 1. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. ROH lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ePay: Nao. ROH: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. REPAY tem um HT Score de 0 e ROH tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos