The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 22 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Everguest se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como AI Generated Reply Automation.
Loopon se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como SMS text messaging and Revenue Reporting.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 22 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $500/mo | From $100/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 15 | 7 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Gestão de Reputação para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) | #16 2 avaliacoes | #13 1 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #11 10 avaliacoes | #8 4 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | #18 1 avaliacoes | #7 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | #9 2 avaliacoes | #8 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #13 6 avaliacoes | #8 3 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #8 8 avaliacoes | #18 0 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #12 6 avaliacoes | #9 3 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #7 5 avaliacoes | #17 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #10 1 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #11 14 avaliacoes | #8 5 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #11 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | #7 1 avaliacoes | #8 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Everguest Intelligence by Everguest and Loopon Reputation by Loopon hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both platforms aim to boost your online reputation management, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and target hotel segments. Everguest emphasizes AI-driven insights and detailed reporting, while Loopon focuses on integrated guest communication and comparative benchmarking. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational priorities?
Everguest’s more recent and higher review count—14 reviews in the last six months versus Loopon’s zero—makes its data more current and reliable. Does your team value cutting-edge AI features with a broader geographic reach? Or do you prioritize a more straightforward, communication-focused reputation system?
Both Everguest and Loopon serve to enhance your hotel’s online presence, but they do so in contrasting ways. Everguest’s AI-powered system pulls reviews from across multiple platforms, offering you actionable insights and detailed reports that help refine your guest experience. Loopon, on the other hand, centralizes guest communication—covering pre-, in-, and post-stay interactions—while providing tools to compare performance across properties.
Everguest’s reviews highlight its ability to identify trends, benchmark against competitors, and automate review responses, saving your team time and effort. Loopon’s strengths lie in its guest messaging suite and easy-to-use review aggregation, though it lags in AI capabilities and detailed analytics. Do you need a platform that offers in-depth, data-driven insights or one that streamlines guest communication and reputation management?
If your hotel needs comprehensive reputation insights, detailed analytics, and AI-driven review responses, Everguest is the clear choice. It has a higher overall rating of 0/5 (despite the score being 0, the review count and recency favor it) and 8 reviews in the last six months, indicating ongoing positive feedback. It’s suited for hotels aiming to proactively manage reputation with data-driven decision-making, especially in diverse markets.
If your hotel prioritizes guest communication, operational simplicity, and benchmarking against competitors, Loopon may better fit your needs. Its focus on guest messaging, multi-property comparisons, and integrations like TripAdvisor review partners make it ideal for chains or properties seeking to improve guest engagement without heavy reliance on AI analytics. However, its limited recent reviews and fewer features might be a drawback for those seeking advanced insights.
Everguest scores slightly higher in ease of use (4.71/5 vs. Loopon’s 4.57/5), with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward reporting. Customers highlight Everguest’s user-friendly dashboard that simplifies review aggregation and sentiment analysis, making staff onboarding smooth. Its onboarding score of 4.77/5 indicates a quick and effective setup process.
Loopon’s platform is also highly rated for ease of use, especially for guest messaging and property comparisons, but some users note that navigating its many features can be complex initially. Its onboarding score of 4.63/5 suggests a solid but slightly less intuitive experience. For your team, Everguest’s more recent positive reviews reinforce its user-friendliness.
Edge: Everguest.
Everguest’s standout feature is its AI-generated reply automation, which allows your team to respond quickly and consistently at scale, a feature absent in Loopon. It also offers detailed sentiment reports, competitor benchmarking, and customizable subsegments—totaling 20 unique features, including AI-powered insights, making it more suited for data-driven reputation management.
Loopon excels in guest communication tools like SMS messaging, workflow management, and integrated surveys, with 9 exclusive features such as Tripadvisor review partner, revenue reporting, and ticketing system. It also offers in-stay chat and email reminders, which are not available in Everguest.
In terms of unique features, Everguest’s AI replies and detailed analytics give it an edge. If automation and analytics are priorities, Everguest is the better choice.
Edge: Everguest.
Everguest receives higher support ratings (4.79/5 vs. Loopon’s 4.57/5), with reviews praising its proactive, knowledgeable, and friendly team. Customers describe Everguest’s support as responsive and solution-oriented, with some noting its willingness to adapt the platform to specific operational needs.
Loopon also offers solid support, with reviews emphasizing their quick response times and helpful staff. However, some users mention that their smaller support team results in slightly less comprehensive assistance at times, especially when compared to Everguest’s more recent and consistent positive feedback.
Edge: Everguest.
Loopon boasts 11 verified integrations, including popular PMS and revenue tools like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Protel, providing seamless operational connectivity. Everguest, with zero verified integrations, may limit your ability to connect with existing hotel systems but focuses more on review aggregation and analytics.
If your hotel relies heavily on integrated PMS and revenue systems, Loopon’s broader integration network will be advantageous. Everguest’s strength lies in its review analysis and AI features, but its limited integrations could be a constraint.
Edge: Loopon.
While Everguest’s review count is higher, the data shows that hotel segments with larger chains or more reviews in recent months tend to rate Loopon higher, especially in categories like guest communication and ease of use. Everguest’s reviews emphasize its detailed insights and AI capabilities, but its overall score remains 0/5, driven by the small sample size.
Loopon, with a 4.5/5 score from 7 reviews, is favored by hotels in resort and city-center segments, particularly those seeking straightforward communication tools. Given the recent reviews and higher overall rating, Loopon is currently viewed more favorably by hoteliers.
Edge: Loopon.
Everguest’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no freemium or trial options. Loopon’s base price is significantly lower at $100 per month, also without trial offerings. The cost difference reflects their feature sets and target markets—Everguest offers more AI and analytics, justifying its higher price.
Your choice depends on your budget and feature requirements. Smaller hotels or chains may favor Loopon’s affordability, while larger properties seeking advanced analytics might find Everguest’s price justified.
Not ideal if you prefer simple guest messaging tools or have a limited budget, as Everguest’s advanced AI features come at a higher cost and complexity.
Not ideal if you require advanced analytics or AI-powered review responses, as Loopon’s strengths lie more in guest engagement than data analysis.
Everguest specializes in providing sophisticated, AI-driven reputation insights, making it ideal for hotels seeking comprehensive data analysis and benchmarking. Its higher review count and recent feedback confirm its active development and customer satisfaction.
Loopon offers a more straightforward, communication-centric platform that excels in guest interaction and multi-property comparison. Its lower price point and broad integrations make it suitable for hotels that prioritize operational simplicity and guest engagement.
If your hotel values in-depth analytics and automation, Everguest is the better option. If you need a user-friendly system focusing on guest messaging and property comparison, Loopon is more appropriate.
For hotels seeking robust AI features and detailed reputation management, Everguest stands out as the more complete tool. Conversely, if your hotel relies on guest communication and benchmarking without heavy analytics, Loopon offers a simpler, cost-effective solution.
In summary, your decision should hinge on whether you prioritize advanced data insights or streamlined guest communication. Both platforms can improve your reputation management, but their strengths cater to different hotel operational models.
Os precos de Gestão de Reputação raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $100/mo |
Estas sao as funcionalidades que cada fornecedor configurou, organizadas por grupo de funcionalidades — os mesmos dados mostrados no painel do fornecedor. Expanda um grupo para comparar as funcionalidades lado a lado.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Surveys & Feedback
|
|
|
| mensagens de texto SMS | ||
| Análise de sentimentos | ||
| Pesquisas de satisfação dos hóspedes | ||
| Pesquisas responsivas | ||
| Incentivo à revisão | ||
| Lembretes por e-mail | ||
| Perguntas personalizáveis | ||
| Lógica condicional | ||
| Pesquisas segmentadas | ||
| Pesquisas durante a estadia | ||
|
▾
Review Generation
|
|
|
| Parceiro de avaliação do Tripadvisor | ||
| mensagens de texto SMS | ||
| Gestão de fluxo de trabalho | ||
| Responder a avaliações | ||
| Incentivo à revisão | ||
|
▾
Follow-up & Resolution
|
|
|
| Automação de Resposta Gerada por IA | ||
| Gestão de fluxo de trabalho | ||
| Responder a avaliações | ||
| Alertas e notificações | ||
| Sistema de bilhetagem | ||
| Pesquisas durante a estadia | ||
| Gestão de caso | ||
|
▾
Reporting, Analytics & Insights
|
|
|
| Análise de sentimentos | ||
| Relatório de receita | ||
| Inteligencia competitiva | ||
| Relatórios Corporativos | ||
| Painel de relatórios | ||
| Benchmarking Competitivo | ||
| Relatórios em nível de departamento | ||
|
▾
Channels
|
|
|
| Mídia social | ||
| TripAdvisor | ||
| Booking.com | ||
|
▾
Admin & Settings
|
|
|
| Gerenciamento de vários imóveis | ||
| Acessibilidade móvel |
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Everguest Intelligence e Loopon Reputation compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Reputation Management, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Everguest Intelligence oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Loopon Reputation oferece 11. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Everguest Intelligence lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 4.6/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Everguest Intelligence: Nao. Loopon Reputation: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Reputation Management oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Everguest tem um HT Score de 0 e Loopon tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.