The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 517 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Actabl se destaca em ROI — especialmente para propriedades independent (5.0/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile access on any device and Mobile Access.
Faster Housekeeping, LLC se destaca em ease of use and customer support .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 517 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 516 | 1 |
Apos analisar 517 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Actabl mais valorizam interface usability & customization, otimização de tarefas de limpeza, guest communication & experience, enquanto os usuarios do Faster Housekeeping, LLC destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Interface Usability & Customization
▾
|
|
|
+
Otimização de tarefas de limpeza
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time Task Management
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Guest Communication & Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Existing Systems
▾
|
|
|
−
Atrasos no acesso móvel
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de limpeza para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 24 avaliacoes | #18 0 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 241 avaliacoes | #18 1 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #1 119 avaliacoes | #21 0 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #1 92 avaliacoes | #15 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 232 avaliacoes | #18 1 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #1 255 avaliacoes | #21 0 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #1 188 avaliacoes | #22 0 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 33 avaliacoes | #21 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #1 417 avaliacoes | #14 1 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #6 43 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #2 9 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #5 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl and Faster Housekeeping by Faster Housekeeping, LLC hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline housekeeping operations, but they differ significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. Actabl offers a comprehensive platform with extensive integrations and a high review count, while Faster Housekeeping provides a straightforward, cost-effective solution with a near-perfect user rating. What factors are most important to your hotel’s success?
Both products focus on optimizing housekeeping workflows, yet their approaches and user experiences are quite distinct. ALICE provides a broad array of features including guest communication, real-time task tracking, and multi-property management, but has a complex interface and some lag issues. Faster Housekeeping emphasizes simplicity and cost savings, with a straightforward interface and a dedicated focus on housekeeping task management. Do you prioritize a feature-rich platform or a lean, easy-to-use system?
If your hotel needs a versatile, multi-department communication platform that integrates with your PMS and manages multiple properties, ALICE is the better fit, especially given its 413 reviews and high recent activity. Conversely, if your primary goal is to reduce housekeeping costs with minimal complexity on a single property, Faster Housekeeping’s 1 review and near-perfect rating make it a compelling choice. Consider your hotel’s size, complexity, and technological maturity when deciding.
ALICE’s user rating of 4.71/5 and 413 reviews reflect a generally positive experience, though some users cite slow performance and interface clutter. New users report a learning curve and occasional frustrations, particularly on mobile devices. Faster Housekeeping boasts a perfect 5/5 rating from its single review, highlighting its simplicity and ease of use. If straightforward operation and quick onboarding are priorities, Edge: Faster Housekeeping.
ALICE offers 21 exclusive features, including lost & found management, virtual logbook, real-time task tracking, multi-language support, and open API access—features not available in Faster Housekeeping. Faster Housekeeping, while streamlined, only provides core housekeeping functionalities without advanced modules. If you need extensive customization and multi-department tools, ALICE holds the edge; for basic housekeeping management, Faster Housekeeping suffices.
ALICE’s support rating of 4.48/5 from 413 reviews indicates generally positive experiences, though some users report slow responses and limited support for older systems. Customers appreciate helpful support staff but note response times could improve. Faster Housekeeping’s perfect 5/5 ratings from its few reviews suggest a highly responsive support team. Given the larger review base, Edge: ALICE, though support perception may vary depending on your hotel’s needs.
ALICE boasts 100 verified integrations, including PMS, revenue management, and POS systems, making it highly adaptable for complex hotel environments. Faster Housekeeping offers no verified integrations, which may limit its use in hotels with existing tech stacks. If seamless connectivity with other systems is crucial, ALICE’s extensive partner network provides a significant advantage.
ALICE’s 4.7/5 rating from 413 reviews reflects broad satisfaction, particularly among hotels in the luxury, branded, and resort segments. Its recent reviews reinforce ongoing customer confidence. Faster Housekeeping’s single review with a perfect rating indicates very high satisfaction, but lacks enough data for a meaningful comparison. Edge: ALICE, given its more extensive and recent review footprint, and higher overall score.
ALICE’s pricing is listed at $900 per month, with no free tier or trial, positioning it as a mid-range investment. Pricing details for Faster Housekeeping are not publicly available, but it emphasizes cost savings and simplicity, suggesting a potentially lower cost structure. Your hotel’s budget and scale will heavily influence the choice here; ALICE’s transparent pricing offers predictability, whereas Faster Housekeeping may be more flexible.
ALICE offers a broad, feature-rich platform suited for large, multi-property hotels needing extensive system integrations and department coordination. Its 413 reviews and recent activity support its reliability and ongoing development, making it a strong choice for complex operations. It excels when detailed reporting, guest communication, and multi-language support matter most.
Faster Housekeeping emphasizes simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use, making it ideal for smaller hotels or resorts focused solely on housekeeping productivity. Its perfect rating from a single review signifies high satisfaction within its niche, but it lacks the extensive features and integrations of ALICE.
Choose ALICE if your hotel requires comprehensive management tools, multi-property oversight, and detailed analytics. Opt for Faster Housekeeping if your primary goal is to streamline housekeeping tasks on a single property with minimal investment. Both can improve your operations, but the right choice depends on your hotel’s scale, complexity, and technological readiness.
Os precos de Software de limpeza raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl e Faster Housekeeping compartilham 12 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de tarefas em tempo real | ||
| Diário de bordo virtual | ||
| Inspeção | ||
| Módulo de achados e perdidos | ||
| Módulo de manutenção preventiva | ||
| Na tradução do aplicativo |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 9 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 1 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We do recommend ALICE to other hotels since it is a way to facilitate work with perfection. ALICE makes our work easier and more efficient in regard to following up and keeping tr..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining... The app is generally user-friendly, but reports of cluttered interfaces and limited customization options suggest room for improvement in streamlining the user experience, particularly for new or less tech-savvy employees.
A ferramenta de organização e limpeza da ALICE recebe elogios pela alocação de tarefas e pelo acompanhamento do status, mas alguns usuários apontam a... A ferramenta de organização e limpeza da ALICE recebe elogios pela alocação de tarefas e pelo acompanhamento do status, mas alguns usuários apontam a necessidade de melhorias nos recursos do módulo e de uma comunicação mais eficaz entre os departamentos.
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operati... ALICE effectively enhances guest service through quick communication of special requests and status updates, bolstering guest satisfaction and operational transparency. However, SMS feature handling is critiqued for its lack of customization.
The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in... The integration capability of ALICE with other systems, such as Opera, is frequently mentioned. Users appreciate smooth data consistency which aids in operational flow, though some face challenges with older system compatibility.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl e Faster Housekeeping compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Housekeeping Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl oferece 100 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Faster Housekeeping oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Faster Housekeeping lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ALICE Housekeeping by Actabl: Nao. Faster Housekeeping: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Housekeeping Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Actabl tem um HT Score de 99 e Faster Housekeeping, LLC tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos