The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 169 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Fersterer se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment Log Reports and Mobile Ordering.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 169 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 169 |
Apos analisar 169 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Fersterer mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam interface do usuário e geração de relatórios, integration with third-party systems, seamless pms integration. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Fersterer |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Interface do usuário e geração de relatórios
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with Third-Party Systems
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Product Development and Feature Evolution
▾
|
|
|
−
Personalização e Flexibilidade
▾
|
|
|
−
Aperfeiçoamentos operacionais
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas POS para hotéis para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 44 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 94 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 7 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #2 9 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 74 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 41 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #3 31 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #2 12 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #3 14 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 130 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | — | #5 4 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #6 0 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right hotel POS system can significantly impact your operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Fersterer Tk32 and Mews POS aim to streamline your front-of-house processes, but their approaches, features, and market presence differ widely. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize extensive integrations, usability, and support or cutting-edge analytics and automation.
Fersterer, with no recent reviews or active feedback, appears to be a niche or lesser-known option. Meanwhile, Mews POS, boasting over 150 recent reviews and a 95% likelihood to recommend, is clearly more established and trusted. How do these contrasting profiles influence your choice?
Fersterer Tk32 claims to provide advanced revenue management capabilities powered by real-time analytics and automation. However, it has no current user reviews or ratings, leaving its real-world effectiveness and usability unverified.
In contrast, Mews POS has amassed over 150 recent reviews, with a strong emphasis on its seamless PMS integration, user-friendly interface, and operational automation. Its high NPS score of 9.32 out of 10 underscores high user satisfaction and frequent recommendation.
While Fersterer is marketed as an innovative revenue system, its lack of recent verification makes it difficult to assess its practical benefits. Mews, on the other hand, demonstrates proven performance, supported by recent hotel experiences. Are you comfortable relying on unverified claims, or do recent user insights guide your decision?
If your hotel needs a reliable, easy-to-adopt POS with a proven track record, go with Mews. Its extensive and recent review base confirms high ease of use, support, and feature richness, making it ideal for properties seeking operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
If, however, your hotel is exploring cutting-edge revenue management with automation and analytics, and you are willing to accept the risk of untested deployment, Fersterer might appeal. But without verified user feedback, its practical benefits and ease of implementation remain uncertain.
For most hoteliers, especially those valuing proven support and user satisfaction, Mews is the safer choice. Fersterer’s niche positioning and lack of recent reviews favor Mews as the more reliable option.
User reviews highlight Mews POS’s intuitive, modern interface, rated 4.74 out of 5, and its straightforward onboarding process with an average rating of 4.39. Multiple reports praise its cross-device functionality, allowing staff to operate seamlessly from desktops, tablets, or smartphones.
Fersterer, on the other hand, has no recent ratings or reviews, making its usability assumptions speculative. The absence of user feedback suggests it has not been widely tested or adopted.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews POS offers a broad suite of 29 features, including PCI compliance, discounts, upselling, digital menus, online ordering, inventory and ingredient management, customer insights, and integration with accounting software. These functionalities directly support restaurant and hotel F&B operations.
Fersterer provides no documented features beyond revenue management, positioning itself more as an analytics tool rather than a comprehensive POS platform.
Given Mews’s extensive feature set tailored for hotel F&B needs, it clearly outstrips Fersterer in capabilities. Edge: Mews POS.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Fersterer, leaving its support quality unknown. Its lack of active user feedback suggests limited or no current support engagement.
Mews, with a 4.43 out of 5 support rating from 156 reviews, has an established reputation for reliable support and onboarding. Users describe their support as “solution-oriented” and “reliable,” which is critical for smooth deployment and ongoing operations.
Edge: Mews POS.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, Orange Hotel Marketing, and FLEXIPASS. Its ecosystem supports extensive third-party connectivity, covering PMS, revenue, marketing, and operational tools.
Fersterer has no verified integrations or partner network, significantly limiting its flexibility and scalability within hotel tech stacks.
For hotels seeking an adaptable platform with an expansive ecosystem, Mews dominates. Edge: Mews POS.
With over 150 recent reviews, Mews’s overall rating of 4.74/5 for ease of use and 4.43/5 for support showcases consistent hotel satisfaction. Hoteliers across segments, especially boutique, city-center, and small hotels, praise its simplicity and operational impact.
Fersterer’s lack of recent reviews means its rating is unknown and unverified in current hotel operations. Its unknown reputation makes it a risky choice for hoteliers.
Given the abundant recent feedback, Mews is the clearly higher-rated product. Edge: Mews POS.
Fersterer’s pricing is undisclosed, with no free trial or clear payment model available. This opacity complicates cost comparisons and budgeting.
Mews charges a $200 monthly base fee, with no free trial, but the transparent pricing provides clarity for budgeting. The cost reflects its broad feature set and extensive integrations.
For budget-conscious hotels valuing transparency, Mews offers clearer value. Fersterer’s cost remains uncertain, making it a less predictable investment.
Fersterer’s AI-driven approach suits revenue-focused hotels that are comfortable with less tangible, analytics-based solutions.
Mews is suited for hotels wanting a comprehensive, cloud-based POS integrated with their PMS and wider tech stack.
Fersterer Tk32 positions itself as a revenue management tool driven by AI analytics, focusing on optimizing income streams through automation. Its lack of recent verified user feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world operational value.
Mews POS, with a proven track record, offers a complete hotel POS platform with over 150 recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and a broad ecosystem of integrations. It supports front-of-house operations, supports guest engagement, and delivers tangible operational benefits.
If your hotel values proven usability, extensive features, and strong ongoing support, Mews POS is the clear choice. Fersterer might appeal to niche markets or hotels specifically seeking advanced revenue analytics, but the risks are higher without verified recent feedback.
In most cases, Mews POS’s established reputation and recent positive hotel reviews make it the safer, more effective investment for your hotel’s POS needs.
Os precos de Sistemas POS para hotéis raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Fersterer |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Fersterer Tk32 e Mews POS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Fersterer |
|
|---|---|---|
| Cardápios Digitais | ||
| Compatível com PCI | ||
| Descontos e promoções | ||
| Divisão de cheques | ||
| Relatórios de Log de Pagamento | ||
| Upselling |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 17 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We’ve been with Mews for a few years now and it helped to transform the way we operate. It’s very intuitive to work with and saves our team so much time."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In an industry where human contact is more important than digital contact, having a platform like Mews that not only reduces time at a screen but also gives us more face time with..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Self-check-in kiosks are integral to LyLo's DNA. Coupled with Mews capabilities like guest messaging and online check-out, they form the essence of our guest experience. In fact, t..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
A interface do Mews é descrita como moderna e intuitiva, facilitando uma navegação fluida. No entanto, algumas avaliações sugerem melhorias na complex... A interface do Mews é descrita como moderna e intuitiva, facilitando uma navegação fluida. No entanto, algumas avaliações sugerem melhorias na complexidade e flexibilidade das ferramentas de geração de relatórios, particularmente para configurações com múltiplas propriedades e análises operacionais detalhadas.
Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centraliz... Mews provides strong connectivity with various third-party systems like channel managers and payment gateways. These integrations facilitate centralized operations, real-time booking management, and accurate financial reporting, although occasional synchronization issues are noted.
Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data... Reviews highlight Mews' outstanding integration between its POS and PMS, allowing direct posting of charges to guest rooms and synchronized guest data. This integration is praised for improving billing accuracy, reducing departmental friction, and enhancing guest service experience by personalizing interactions.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a... Mews' commitment to developing new features and evolving its product is seen positively. Users appreciate its openness to feedback, though there is a need for more polished features and quicker implementation of user suggestions.
A plataforma é elogiada por suas opções de personalização, que permitem fluxos de trabalho e alertas sob medida para aprimorar a experiência do hósped... A plataforma é elogiada por suas opções de personalização, que permitem fluxos de trabalho e alertas sob medida para aprimorar a experiência do hóspede. No entanto, os usuários também expressam a necessidade de recursos de personalização mais intuitivos para necessidades operacionais específicas e interações com os hóspedes.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Fersterer Tk32 e Mews POS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Hotel POS Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Fersterer Tk32 oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews POS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews POS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Fersterer Tk32: Nao. Mews POS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Hotel POS Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Fersterer tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos