The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Flatswire se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Flatswire mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Flatswire |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Flatswire and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and the value you place on recent feedback and comprehensive features. While Flatswire’s presence is virtually nonexistent in reviews and market data, Mews boasts a dominant reputation with over 750 reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a recent surge in positive feedback, especially in ease of use and support. Which platform will better serve your property’s current and future needs?
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Mews excels in its extensive integrations, user-friendly design, and broad industry adoption. Flatswire’s limited review data and lack of verified features place it at a significant disadvantage. Are you prepared to rely on a solution with proven industry backing and ongoing innovation?
Flatswire offers a comprehensive property management solution tailored primarily for property managers, with functionalities spanning tenant management to maintenance. However, it appears to lack the adaptability needed for hotels, especially those seeking an integrated guest experience. Conversely, Mews is a cloud-native system explicitly designed for the hospitality sector, offering over 59 features including booking management, guest CRM, revenue tools, and extensive integrations.
Mews’s broad regional presence—operating across 54 countries—along with its focus on scalability, positions it as the more mature solution. Given its recent review momentum and high recommendation scores, Mews clearly outperforms Flatswire in industry trust. Do you want a platform proven in hospitality, or a less well-documented property system?
If your hotel needs a flexible, fully integrated PMS capable of supporting multi-property management, guest engagement, and revenue optimization, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set, over 336 verified integrations, and proven scalability make it ideal for hotels that prioritize operational automation and guest satisfaction.
If you are looking for a tenant-focused system primarily managing lease or property portfolios, and are less concerned with guest-centric features, Flatswire might seem suitable—though the lack of recent reviews and verified functionalities makes it a risky choice. For hotel operators, Mews remains the clear leader in industry-specific solutions.
Mews’s user interface has received high praise, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating and over 98 recent reviews, many raving about its intuitive setup and straightforward onboarding. Customers report that staff adoption is quick, with many mentioning that the platform’s modern design simplifies daily tasks.
Flatswire, on the other hand, has no review ratings or recent feedback to gauge its usability. Its lack of visible user experience data casts doubt on its practicality for busy hotel teams. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a robust suite with 59 unique features including multi-lingual support, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping modules, integrated CRS, and automated reports. Flatswire provides no verified features or differentiators, making it impossible to compare on functional depth.
Given the extensive feature count and proven capabilities of Mews, it clearly holds the advantage here. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are solid, with a 4.27/5 score and over 98 recent reviews praising its responsiveness, onboarding assistance, and continuous updates. Many reviews mention that Mews support is proactive and helpful, often resolving issues swiftly.
There are no recent reviews or support ratings for Flatswire, and its negative comments highlight a lack of support on implementation and system understanding. Based on available data, Mews’s support outperforms Flatswire significantly. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and third-party apps like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Flatswire appears to have no verified integrations, limiting its adaptability.
This extensive ecosystem enables hotels to customize operations to their needs, a critical factor for modern properties. Edge: Mews.
Mews enjoys a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 758 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and scalability. Its property management solution is highly favored across various hotel segments, notably boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties.
Flatswire has no recent or verified reviews, making it impossible to determine hotel satisfaction. Given the volume and recency of Mews reviews, it is the preferred choice. Edge: Mews.
Flatswire’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting it may not have transparent or scalable pricing models. Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month with no implementation fees, making it a predictable investment for hotels seeking comprehensive solutions.
While the actual costs for Flatswire remain unclear, Mews’s transparent pricing and extensive features offer better value for hotels committed to growth and operational excellence.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes guest experience, automation, or multi-property management, as Flatswire lacks visible features and recent reviews supporting these needs.
Not ideal if your hotel operates on a very limited budget or prefers legacy, on-premise systems without cloud features.
Mews stands out as the clear leader in hotel property management, with proven, recent reviews validating its ease of use, support, and feature depth. Flatswire, lacking recent data and verified functionalities, appears unsuitable for modern hotel operations.
If your hotel needs a scalable, industry-proven PMS that enhances guest satisfaction and operational efficiency, go with Mews. Its extensive ecosystem and customer satisfaction scores make it the safest and most future-proof choice.
Choose Flatswire only if your operational focus is on property or tenant management with no requirement for hotel-specific features, but be wary of the limited data supporting its efficacy. For true hotel management, Mews remains the definitive platform.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Flatswire |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Flatswire e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Flatswire e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Flatswire oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Flatswire: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Flatswire tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos