The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Jaras se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como On premise and Guest Messaging.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 0 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do Jaras destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Jaras hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and regional presence. While both aim to streamline property management, HotelTime’s extensive feature set and proven global presence make it the more mature solution, especially for larger or multi-property hotels. Jaras, being newer and less established, offers a modern, all-in-one cloud-native platform that appeals to properties seeking centralization and automation but lacks the same depth of customer feedback and integrations.
HotelTime PMS excels in serving a broad spectrum of hotels—from independent boutique properties to large resorts—thanks to its mature platform, rich feature set, and extensive integration options. It offers over 37 unique features exclusive to its platform, such as integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, and automation tools, which support complex operations and scale effectively. Conversely, Jaras, with its single unique feature—guest messaging—and no verified integrations, seems tailored toward smaller or more tech-savvy properties prioritizing centralization and automation. The real question is, do you need HotelTime’s robust set of tools and global reach or Jaras’s simplified, modern approach?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, proven PMS that handles multiple departments, integrations, and has a strong international footprint, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its ability to support properties of all sizes, backed by over 433 reviews and a high satisfaction score (4.83/5), underpins its reliability for larger or multi-property management teams. For smaller properties or those prioritizing automation, centralized operations, and ease of use, Jaras may appeal due to its integrated reservation, financial workflows, and over 150 OTA integrations—though it lacks the extensive user feedback and third-party support HotelTime offers.
HotelTime’s user interface has an average ease of use rating of 4.66/5, supported by a solid onboarding score of 4.63/5 and positive reviews emphasizing its intuitive design. Users frequently mention that, despite its complexity, once familiar, it streamlines operations and reduces workload. Jaras, with no available user ratings, leaves its ease of use uncertain, but its modern, cloud-native design suggests a straightforward experience. Still, without verified reviews, it’s difficult to confidently compare. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts a total of 37 features exclusive to its platform—such as EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, and mobile check-in—supporting complex, multifaceted hotel operations. In contrast, Jaras offers core reservation management, channel distribution with over 150 OTA integrations, and guest messaging. While Jaras simplifies central management, HotelTime’s broader feature set makes it more suitable for hotels with diverse operational needs. End of the day, HotelTime’s feature depth surpasses Jaras’s, making it the more comprehensive choice. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team scores 4.73/5, with reviews highlighting quick responses, helpfulness, and detailed onboarding. Users say, “Support staff are always on the other end of the phone and willing to help,” reinforcing confidence in their service. Jaras, founded in 2023 with no publicly available reviews, offers no verified support ratings, making it hard to assess. Given HotelTime’s established presence and recent customer feedback, it clearly provides better support at this stage. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major providers like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, enabling a seamless tech stack for larger operations. Jaras, launched in 2023, has no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options. This substantial difference favors HotelTime for hotels seeking a flexible, integrated system capable of supporting complex workflows across multiple platforms. End of the day, HotelTime’s extensive integration network gives it a decisive edge. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s average rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews underscores high user satisfaction, particularly from resorts (5/5) and city hotels (4.82/5). Recent reviews highlight its ease of reservation management and support, making it a trusted choice. Jaras, with no reviews, offers no data on user satisfaction, leaving its rating unknown. HotelTime’s proven track record and recent positive feedback make it the clear leader here. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a base price of $600/month, with no mention of freemium versions or additional fees. Jaras’s pricing starts at $1,000/month, also without free options. Considering HotelTime’s lower entry price and extensive feature set, it offers better value for most hotels, especially those seeking a proven, scalable system.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small, single-property operation with minimal operational complexity or if you prefer a simple, lightweight PMS.
Not ideal if you require extensive support, integrations with third-party providers, or proven experience in the global hospitality market.
HotelTime is a comprehensive, established PMS with a proven track record and a broad feature set that supports large and complex hotel operations. Its extensive integrations, high customer satisfaction, and regional presence make it suitable for larger resorts and multi-property groups.
Jaras, as a newer entrant, offers a sleek, cloud-native platform ideal for smaller, tech-savvy properties looking for automation and centralization, but with limited integration options and no verified reviews.
Choose HotelTime if your hotel needs reliability, depth, and proven performance; opt for Jaras if you want a modern, simplified system to get started quickly, especially if your operations are relatively straightforward.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $1,000/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e Jaras compartilham 14 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Mensagens de convidados | ||
| Na premissa | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Taxas personalizadas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e Jaras compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Jaras oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. Jaras: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 92 e Jaras tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos