The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Libra Hospitality se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 0 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do Libra Hospitality destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right PMS can dramatically influence your hotel's operations, guest experience, and profitability. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Logus by Libra Hospitality both aim to simplify hotel management, but their strengths and market presence differ significantly. HotelTime's extensive feature set and large user base make it a more proven solution, especially for properties seeking comprehensive management tools. Logus, while capable, lacks the same level of reviews and recent feedback, raising questions about its market traction and support. Are you ready to prioritize proven stability over emerging options?
HotelTime PMS and Logus both serve as central hubs for hotel operations, streamlining reservations, billing, and guest management. HotelTime, with its 433 reviews and recent activity—27 in the last six months—demonstrates ongoing support and innovation, while Logus has no recent reviews, making its current performance harder to gauge. HotelTime’s 4.83/5 overall rating and 91 HTR score reflect consistent user satisfaction, whereas Logus, without recent feedback, offers no comparable data. Given the data, HotelTime clearly holds the advantage in reliability and customer confidence.
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich platform with proven support and wide integration options, go with HotelTime PMS. It’s ideal for properties of all sizes—resorts, groups, independent hotels—that require robust automation, extensive third-party integrations, and a trusted support network. Conversely, if your hotel has very specific, lightweight needs and prefers a system with minimal market presence, Logus might be worth exploring, though its lack of recent reviews is a concern. For most hoteliers, HotelTime’s established reputation makes it the safer choice.
HotelTime PMS scores 4.66/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding. Users highlight that new staff can adapt quickly, and ongoing updates improve functionality, though some note initial complexity in setup. Logus has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to assess its user experience or onboarding process. Based on available data, HotelTime’s user-friendliness is clearly superior.
HotelTime offers an impressive suite of 51 unique features, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automation, group management, online check-in, and wellness modules—many of which are absent in Logus. Logus’s feature set appears more limited, with no detailed list available, and no exclusive functionalities highlighted beyond core PMS functions. The breadth and depth of HotelTime’s features provide more value for diverse hotel operations. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s support team is rated 4.73/5, with reviewers describing it as responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Many reviews mention rapid response times and ongoing assistance, which contributes to high satisfaction. Since Logus offers no recent support ratings or reviews, its support quality remains uncertain. Based on data, HotelTime’s support is more dependable and well-regarded.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools. Its extensive third-party ecosystem allows properties to build a customizable tech stack, while Logus has only 2 verified integrations, with just one shared partner—Hotellab. This limited integration capability constrains flexibility for hotels wanting an interconnected system. Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s 4.83/5 rating comes from 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability and feature set. It’s favored across multiple segments, especially resorts and city center hotels, which rate it above 4.8/5. Logus lacks recent reviews and ratings, creating uncertainty about user satisfaction. For hoteliers seeking proven performance, HotelTime’s ratings speak louder and more convincingly.
HotelTime charges $600 per month with no implementation or setup fees, offering a clear, predictable cost structure. Information on Logus’s pricing isn't available, which complicates direct comparisons. Due to the transparency and established value of HotelTime’s pricing, it stands out as a straightforward investment for most hotels.
HotelTime PMS is a comprehensive, scalable platform with a long track record of satisfied users worldwide. Its extensive features, strong support, and broad integration options make it suitable for hotels of all sizes seeking operational transparency and efficiency. Logus, while promising, remains untested in recent reviews, limiting confidence in its current offerings.
Choose HotelTime if you want a proven, feature-rich PMS with extensive support and integrations. It’s the better fit for hotels that aim to streamline operations, improve guest service, and support growth confidently.
Opt for Logus only if your hotel’s operational needs are minimal, and you are comfortable testing a system with limited market visibility. For most hoteliers, HotelTime’s track record and recent review activity make it the safer, smarter investment.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e Logus by Libra Hospitality compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e Logus by Libra Hospitality compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Logus by Libra Hospitality oferece 2. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. Logus by Libra Hospitality: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 92 e Libra Hospitality tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos