The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
ZHARA se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 549 | 0 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do HOTELTIME mais valorizam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics, enquanto os usuarios do ZHARA destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #5 219 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 238 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #2 46 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #8 7 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 239 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #3 241 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #4 143 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #4 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | #52 4 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #2 384 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #5 111 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #1 21 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for streamlining operations, enhancing guest experiences, and increasing revenue. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and ZHARA by ZHARA both target this goal but approach it differently. HotelTime offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with a large user base and active recent reviews, whereas ZHARA appears more focused on revenue management, with fewer reviews and no recent user feedback. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s needs for features versus revenue insights.
Are you prioritizing a proven, well-supported PMS with extensive features, or are you looking for a specialized revenue management solution? Let’s compare these two platforms across key hotel operation aspects.
HotelTime PMS is a full-featured, cloud-based system designed to cover every aspect of hotel management, from reservations to spa and wellness modules. ZHARA specializes in revenue management, offering AI-driven insights and market trend analytics, but it lacks the broad operational tools HotelTime provides. HotelTime’s 433 reviews, with a recent 27 in the last six months, and a high 4.83/5 rating make it the more tested and trusted choice.
HotelTime emphasizes operational efficiency, real-time data access, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes. ZHARA’s focus on analytics makes it more appropriate for revenue-focused teams that want data-driven pricing strategies. Which of these priorities better aligns with your hotel’s goals?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive management system that handles reservations, POS, guest profiles, and housekeeping, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its broad feature set—over 51 unique features—supports day-to-day operations for properties of all sizes, including resorts and groups.
If your primary goal is maximizing revenue through advanced pricing strategies and market trend analysis, ZHARA’s AI-driven insights could be more beneficial. However, with no recent reviews or customer feedback, ZHARA’s practical usability remains uncertain. For most hotels, especially those seeking an all-in-one platform, HotelTime’s proven track record makes it the safer pick.
HotelTime boasts a high ease-of-use rating (4.66/5) backed by over 400 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Its user-friendly design simplifies staff training and daily operations, although some report initial complexity in setting up modules.
ZHARA provides a streamlined, data-focused interface tailored for revenue management, but with no recent reviews, its actual usability remains unverified. Without direct user feedback, it’s difficult to assess ease of adoption or staff training.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s 51 features include integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, mobile check-in, housekeeping modules, group functionality, online support, and revenue management tools. It also offers specialized modules like spa & wellness, gift vouchers, and real-time status updates—features critical for operational control.
ZHARA specializes in AI-powered revenue insights and market trend analytics but lacks the broad operational features HotelTime offers. Given the extensive feature set of HotelTime, it clearly has the edge for full hotel management needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support scores (4.73/5) and over 430 reviews indicate strong, responsive customer service. Hospitality clients consistently mention quick response times, helpful onboarding, and ongoing support, which are vital for smooth operations.
ZHARA, with no recent reviews or customer feedback, leaves its support quality unverified. A proven support team is crucial when deploying new systems, making HotelTime the more reliable choice here.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including payment gateways, channel managers, and third-party services like Profitroom and STR. These integrations support seamless data flow and operational flexibility across multiple systems.
ZHARA has no listed integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. For a hotel seeking a flexible, interconnected platform, HotelTime’s extensive integration options are a clear advantage.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83/5 from 433 reviews underscores its widespread hotel industry acceptance. Its top segment ratings include a 4.82/5 for general properties and a 4.9/5 for brand hotels, especially appreciated for usability, support, and feature depth.
ZHARA lacks recent reviews, user ratings, or detailed feedback, so its real-world performance cannot be assessed. HotelTime’s high, recent review volume makes it the clear leader in customer satisfaction.
Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime charges a flat $600 monthly fee, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees listed. ZHARA’s pricing is not provided, making direct comparison impossible.
Given the transparent pricing for HotelTime and its extensive feature set, it offers a tangible value proposition. The lack of pricing info from ZHARA makes its cost-benefit analysis difficult, but HotelTime’s known costs and proven returns favor it for most hotels.
HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME is a comprehensive, well-supported platform with a proven track record, suitable for a broad range of hotel types. Its extensive feature set, integrations, recent high review scores, and active customer feedback make it the better choice for most hoteliers.
ZHARA concentrates on revenue management with AI-powered insights, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and integrations limits its appeal for general hotel operations. If your focus is on optimizing pricing strategies and you already have operational systems in place, ZHARA could be a fit—but for most properties, HotelTime offers more value and reliability.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s large user base and recent positive reviews establish it as the more trustworthy and versatile PMS. Its broad capabilities support your team in running an efficient, guest-focused hotel, making it the recommended choice.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
ZHARA | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, HotelTime PMS e ZHARA compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. HotelTime PMS e ZHARA compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. HotelTime PMS oferece 58 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto ZHARA oferece 0. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
HotelTime PMS: Nao. ZHARA: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. HOTELTIME tem um HT Score de 91 e ZHARA tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos