The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Isidoro se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Isidoro mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Isidoro |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Isidoro by Isidoro and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both claim to streamline property management, but their capabilities, user base, and support vary significantly. Isidoro’s platform is virtually unreviewed and lacks recent data, while Mews boasts a strong track record backed by hundreds of recent reviews and a high user rating. Which system will truly serve your hotel today and scale with you tomorrow?
If your priority is a proven, highly-rated PMS with a broad ecosystem of integrations and a track record of supporting diverse hotel types, Mews stands out. Conversely, Isidoro's minimal review data and absence of a recent user base make it difficult to assess its true performance or suitability.
Both Isidoro and Mews aim to simplify hotel operations, but their approaches diverge sharply. Isidoro offers no public feature list, no verified integrations, and no recent reviews, raising questions about its capabilities and support. Mews, on the other hand, provides over 59 unique features, more than 336 verified integrations, and hundreds of recent reviews that consistently praise its ease of use, support, and flexibility.
Mews’s recent reviews from nearly 100 hotels in the last six months, with a 93% likelihood to recommend, reinforce its relevance and reliability. Isidoro's lack of recent data and zero reviews make it impossible to determine its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Are you willing to take a chance on an unproven system, or do you prefer a solution with validated performance?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system with extensive third-party integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear choice. It caters well to boutique hotels, resorts, and larger properties, offering modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and real-time reporting—features highly valued by hotels of various sizes.
If your hotel operates a single property with minimal complexity, and you're comfortable with an untested platform, Isidoro might seem appealing, but there's no recent data to confirm this. For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, guest experience, and long-term scalability, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer, more strategic investment.
Mews is praised by users for its intuitive, modern interface, with a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on 758 reviews, and a straightforward onboarding process scored similarly. Reviewers consistently highlight how quickly staff adopt Mews, citing its clean design and helpful training resources.
In contrast, Isidoro’s ease of use is not documented publicly, with no reviews or ratings available. The absence of user feedback makes it impossible to compare usability directly, but given Mews’s extensive positive reviews, it’s clear that Mews is the more user-friendly option. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, advanced booking engines, guest CRM, real-time reporting, automated night audits, and extensive integrations. These features enable a hotel to personalize the guest journey, automate operations, and connect to a broad tech ecosystem.
Isidoro’s feature set is not publicly available or verified, with no specific modules or functionalities listed. Without concrete information, it’s impossible to assess whether it offers comparable capabilities. Based on available data, Mews’s extensive feature set provides a decisive edge. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support has been rated 4.27/5 by users, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users often mention that support teams resolve issues swiftly, with some noting their proactive communication during onboarding.
Isidoro’s customer support is unreviewed and unverified, making it impossible to compare support quality confidently. Given Mews’s high support ratings and consistent recent praise, it’s clear that Mews provides more reliable, accessible support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, offering a comprehensive ecosystem. This enables hotels to tailor their tech stack for operations, revenue, and guest experience enhancements.
Isidoro reports no verified partners, raising concerns about its capability to connect with other hotel systems. Without proven integrations, Isidoro’s flexibility is questionable. Mews’s extensive ecosystem offers a significant practical advantage. Edge: Mews.
With over 758 recent reviews, Mews maintains a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% recommendation rate from diverse properties including boutique hotels, hostels, resorts, and chains. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and extensive features, particularly for mid-sized and larger operations.
Isidoro’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The recent and plentiful positive feedback for Mews decisively favors it as the trusted, high-rated choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews costs $900/month with no free tier or trial, which might be a barrier for some small properties. Isidoro’s pricing is not publicly available, and with no recent reviews or user data, it’s unclear whether it offers a competitive or scalable pricing model.
Given Mews’s transparent pricing and proven value, it offers a clear financial benchmark. Without data supporting Isidoro’s cost-effectiveness, Mews’s price point, supported by extensive positive reviews, remains a more concrete indicator of value.
Not ideal if:
Edge: None (uncertain due to lack of data).
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Mews is a proven, feature-packed PMS supported by a large user community and extensive recent reviews. Its broad ecosystem, high support ratings, and documented success stories make it a reliable partner for hotels aiming to grow and innovate.
Isidoro’s platform remains unreviewed and unverified, with no recent data to confirm its capabilities or support quality. For hotels serious about operational efficiency, guest experience, and future growth, Mews’s established track record makes it the clear choice.
If you want a system with proven functionality, seamless integrations, and happy users, go with Mews.
If your hotel has minimal needs and is willing to take a risk on an untested platform, Isidoro might be worth exploring—but proceed with caution.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews and extensive features position it as the smarter, safer investment for your hotel’s management system today.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Isidoro |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Isidoro e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Isidoro |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Isidoro e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Isidoro oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Isidoro: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Isidoro tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos