The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Jaras se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como On premise.
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Jaras mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Jaras by Jaras and Mews PMS depends heavily on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scope. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but they diverge significantly in features, scalability, and user experience. Where Jaras offers a centralized, reservation-focused platform, Mews emphasizes automation, integrations, and a broader ecosystem. Do you prioritize comprehensive automation or a unified reservation hub?
Jaras excels in unit management, financial workflows, and its on-premise option, but it has zero reviews in recent months, suggesting limited data on current performance. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback confirming a high satisfaction rate. Would you trust a product with more momentum and proven user confidence?
Jaras is a cloud-native platform designed to manage reservations, automation, and financial workflows across hotels, resorts, and serviced apartments. It consolidates core operations into a single dashboard but lacks the extensive third-party integrations and advanced features found in Mews.
Mews is a highly adaptable, cloud-based PMS supporting diverse hotel types, with over 336 verified integrations and advanced modules like guest CRM, online check-in, and automated night audits. Its recent reviews praise ease of use, automation, and global reach, making it a strong choice for hotels aiming for digital transformation.
Do you need a straightforward reservation system, or do you want a comprehensive, scalable platform capable of integrating with your entire tech stack?
If your hotel needs a flexible solution with extensive integrations, automation, and proven scalability, go with Mews. Its large user base, recent reviews, and industry accolades show it’s well-positioned for both independent and large property portfolios.
If you require a reservation-centric system with on-premise options and simpler workflows, Jaras might fit, especially if your operations are focused on unit management without complex integrations. However, keep in mind the limited recent user feedback on Jaras, which raises questions about ongoing support and feature updates.
For hotels prioritizing rapid growth, guest experience, and operational efficiency, Mews is the safer, more future-proof choice.
Mews receives a 4.7/5 ease-of-use rating based on over 98 recent reviews, with users describing its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Support for staff adoption is emphasized, with many users citing quick setup times and minimal training.
Jaras, on the other hand, has no recent reviews, so its ease of use is less validated. Its on-premise feature might suggest a more traditional interface, but without current user feedback, usability remains uncertain.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 44 exclusive features, including multi-lingual/multi-currency support, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated payment terminals, automated night audits, and a marketplace with 1,000+ apps. Its comprehensive suite caters to modern hotel needs, from revenue management to guest engagement.
Jaras provides only one unique feature—on-premise deployment—while its core offerings focus on reservation management and automation. It does not match Mews’ breadth of features or third-party ecosystem.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores a 4.27/5, with recent reviews highlighting their quick response times, helpful onboarding, and proactive problem-solving. Many users note the availability of 24/7 live chat and dedicated onboarding teams as key strengths.
Jaras has no recent reviews, making it impossible to assess current support quality. Past feedback suggests limited support during implementation, but current data is lacking.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular tools like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and extensive marketplace enable seamless connection to revenue management, channel distribution, and POS systems.
Jaras has no verified partners listed, indicating a limited or non-existent integration ecosystem. This restricts flexibility and scalability for hotels relying on third-party tools.
Edge: Mews.
With over 758 reviews, Mews’s 4.62/5 rating reflects strong, consistent satisfaction across hotel segments, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and city-center properties. Recent reviews praise its user-friendly design and automation features, with some calling it “the most intuitive cloud platform on the market.”
Jaras has no recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current hotel perceptions. Its unknown status suggests it’s not widely adopted or trusted compared to Mews’ proven track record.
Edge: Mews.
Jaras charges a flat $1,000 monthly fee with no free trial, freemium, implementation, or per-room charges. Its pricing model appears straightforward but may lack flexibility for smaller properties.
Mews costs $900 per month, with no mention of implementation or additional fees; no trial info is available. Its slightly lower price point, combined with extensive features, offers a good value for scalable hotel operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews’s strengths lie in its vast feature set, global presence, and active user community, making it a reliable choice for hotels aiming to modernize operations. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, ease of use, and a broad ecosystem that supports growth.
Jaras’s core offering is reservation automation and on-premise solutions, but with no recent feedback, its ability to compete today is uncertain. It might suit smaller hotels with very specific needs but lacks the proven scalability and integration Mews provides.
If you want a future-ready platform with extensive integrations and proven support, Mews is the clear winner. Choose Jaras only if your hotel’s focus is on centralized reservation management without complex integrations, and you’re prepared for limited recent user input.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Jaras e Mews PMS compartilham 15 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Na premissa | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| Taxas personalizadas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 33 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Jaras e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Jaras oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Jaras: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Jaras tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos