The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
PREVIO se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do PREVIO destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Previo hinges on your hotel’s operational needs and growth ambitions. Mews is a proven leader with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and glowing recent reviews, while Previo offers a regional, all-in-one solution primarily focused on CEE markets. Your decision should reflect your hotel’s size, complexity, and future plans.
Mews’s large user base and recent user feedback demonstrate a mature, well-supported platform with a track record of streamlining operations. Previo, while comprehensive, has limited recent reviews and a narrower market focus. Does your hotel need a globally proven PMS or a regionally tailored tool?
Mews and Previo both aim to unify hotel operations, but they approach this goal differently. Mews excels with a cloud-native, highly customizable platform that automates tasks, enhances guest experiences, and offers over 1,000 integrations. Previo provides an all-in-one cloud system with PMS, booking engine, guest app, and payment automation, mainly targeting the CEE region.
Mews’s recent reviews—98 in the last six months—highlight its ease of use, extensive feature set, and superior support, making it the preferred choice for diverse hotel types. Previo’s absence of recent reviews and limited global presence suggest it may be less adaptable for hotels looking to grow or operate internationally.
Are you prioritizing a mature, extensively reviewed platform with proven scalability and integrations, or a regional system with a narrower scope?
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich PMS with a global footprint and a broad partner ecosystem, go with Mews. Its high user ratings (4.62/5), recent reviews, and extensive integrations make it ideal for independent hotels, boutique properties, and chains seeking automation and guest-centric features.
If you predominantly operate within the CEE region and need an integrated system that combines PMS, booking engine, and housekeeping for simplified management, Previo could meet your needs. However, with fewer recent reviews and a smaller user base, it might lack the scalability and support that modern hotels demand.
For hotels aiming to grow internationally or leverage automation, Mews offers a clear advantage. Conversely, regional operators satisfied with a local solution might find Previo sufficient—though limited review data makes this less certain.
Mews’s UI scores a 4.7/5, and recent reviews praise its modern, intuitive design that reduces onboarding time and staff training. Clients report that staff can log in remotely, and the platform’s simplicity enables quick adoption, often within days—"Mews is very user-friendly and makes everything much easier," says one recent reviewer.
Previo’s usability details are scarce, but no recent reviews or user feedback are available to gauge its ease of use. Given Mews’s high ratings and active support, it’s safe to say Mews offers a more user-friendly experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 31 shared features plus 28 exclusive to it, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, automated night audit, real-time reporting, and a guest app. Its platform is designed for versatility, automation, and guest engagement, supported by a robust API and extensive third-party integrations.
Previo’s feature set includes PMS, booking engine, channel management, guest app, payment automation, and housekeeping—covering essential operations but with less detail on advanced or automation-focused features. It lacks the breadth of integrations and customization options found in Mews.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are 4.27/5, with recent reviews praising its quick responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Comments include “The support team sets new standards,” and “Mews support has improved significantly,” reflecting solid, ongoing support.
Previo’s support metrics and reviews are unavailable, making it hard to judge. Given Mews’s well-established support reputation and recent positive feedback, it leads in this category.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including major brands like HQ Revenue, OpenTable, and Onity, with over 1,000 integrations accessible via its Marketplace. This ecosystem allows easy connection of revenue tools, channel managers, POS, and more, supporting complex, multi-property operations.
Previo has just 7 verified partners, with only 6 shared with Mews, indicating a limited integration ecosystem. For hotels needing extensive connectivity, Mews’s ecosystem is a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews—98 in the last six months—produce an overall rating of 4.62/5, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotel segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and independent properties rate it highly, with reviews emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support.
Previo lacks recent review data, making it impossible to gauge current customer satisfaction. Mews’s recent high ratings and active user feedback position it as the more trusted choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month with no implementation or trial fees, reflecting a predictable, subscription-based model suitable for hotels of various sizes. Pricing details for Previo are not publicly available, but it is generally marketed as an all-in-one cloud system in Central and Eastern Europe.
While Previo’s cost structure remains unclear, Mews’s transparent pricing allows for easier budgeting and assessment of ROI—crucial for decision-making.
Mews is a mature, feature-rich, and highly rated PMS trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Its extensive integrations, automation capabilities, and recent reviews demonstrate a proven ability to streamline operations and enhance guest experiences.
Choose Mews if you need a flexible, scalable platform with a global footprint, extensive support, and a large partner ecosystem. Its latest reviews reinforce its dominance for hotels seeking efficiency, growth, and innovation.
Previo may suit regional hotels in CEE seeking a simple, integrated system, but limited recent feedback and fewer integrations suggest it’s less suited for hotels with growth ambitions or complex operations.
For most modern hotels aiming for operational excellence and future-proofing, Mews remains the stronger choice—definitively.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e Previo compartilham 31 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| Suporte on-line 24 horas por dia, 7 dias por semana |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 16 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e Previo compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 336 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Previo oferece 7. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. Previo: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 99 e PREVIO tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos