The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 23 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
PayU Money se destaca .
roommaster se destaca em ease of use and customer support , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Contactless Payments and Payment Tokenization.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 23 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 23 |
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de processamento de pagamentos para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 6 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 7 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) | — | #4 1 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) | — | #4 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #4 7 avaliacoes |
| Luxo | — | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia | — | #4 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada | — | #4 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #4 14 avaliacoes |
| Europa | — | #5 0 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio | — | #3 0 avaliacoes |
Your hotel’s choice between PayU Money and roommaster Payments hinges on your specific needs for payment processing. Both tools aim to streamline transactions, but their features, reliability, and user feedback differ sharply. PayU Money, despite its lack of reviews and recent data, is a lesser-known option in your region, while roommaster Payments—backed by a solid 20 recent reviews and a 4.45/5 support rating—offers a more proven track record. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
PayU Money remains largely unreviewed, offering no recent customer feedback, ratings, or a clear market presence, making it difficult to gauge its performance or reliability. Conversely, roommaster Payments boasts 20 recent reviews with an average support score of 4.45/5 and an NPS of 8.4, indicating satisfied hoteliers and more recent validation of its capabilities.
Both products aim to process payments efficiently, but roommaster’s extensive feature set and proven customer satisfaction suggest it’s better suited for hotels seeking reliability. Are you willing to risk an untested solution, or do you prefer a platform with documented hotel experiences?
If your hotel needs a fully integrated, feature-rich payment system that reduces manual work and chargebacks, go with roommaster Payments. Its 13 unique features—like chargeback management, contactless payments, and PCI compliance—make it suitable for mid-sized to large properties seeking operational efficiency.
If your hotel has minimal transaction needs, is experimenting with payment processors, or prioritizes regional presence over proven reviews, PayU Money might seem appealing. But given the lack of recent reviews and market data, roommaster remains the safer bet for most hotels. Which features matter most to your team?
Roommaster Payments scores an impressive 4.4/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers mention their staff find it simple to operate, and support staff are generally helpful, with some noting their team answers questions promptly.
PayU Money, on the other hand, shows no available ratings or reviews, and its untested platform likely lacks the same level of polish. The absence of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess usability, but the lack of support ratings suggests potential hurdles.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments offers 13 distinct features, including refund management, authorization adjustments, contactless payments, tokenization, and PCI compliance—capabilities that are critical for secure and flexible transactions. PayU Money, with no unique features listed, seems to lack the depth that hotel operators increasingly require.
The feature gap indicates roommaster’s system is more suitable for hotels needing advanced payment controls and integrations. If features like chargeback management and flexible deposit scheduling are priorities, roommaster is the clear choice. Edge: roommaster Payments.
Support quality is crucial in payment processing. roommaster Payments boasts a 4.45/5 support rating based on recent reviews, with hoteliers praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Many reviews mention their team resolving issues swiftly and being accessible when needed.
PayU Money, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no concrete support data, making it a risky choice if dependable assistance is important for your operations. Given the importance of support in payments, roommaster’s higher support rating is a significant advantage.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments integrates with over 56 verified partners, including well-known systems like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia, offering extensive options for hotel workflows. Its broad integration base allows for smoother operations across property management, booking engines, and revenue tools.
PayU Money has only one verified partner, Yanolja Cloud Solution, indicating a very limited integration footprint. If your hotel relies on multiple third-party systems, roommaster’s extensive network makes it a more suitable choice. Edge: roommaster Payments.
roommaster Payments’s 20 recent reviews and a 4.45/5 support score suggest a generally positive hotel sentiment, especially among boutique and resort hotels. Hoteliers appreciate its ease of use, quick support, and operational features, with reviews highlighting its reliability.
PayU Money, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be confidently rated by hoteliers. The absence of validation makes roommaster the safer, more trusted option for most property types.
Edge: roommaster Payments.
PayU Money does not list any pricing details or trial options, which suggests it may operate on a customized or undisclosed basis. In contrast, roommaster Payments charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or setup fees mentioned.
The transparent pricing of roommaster Payments allows hotels to evaluate costs upfront, whereas PayU Money’s unknown pricing makes budgeting difficult. For predictable expenses, roommaster offers clarity.
Not ideal if your hotel needs reliable support, extensive features, or proven performance.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very minimal transaction volume or prefers a regional, less feature-intensive solution.
The core difference lies in reliability and proven performance. roommaster Payments has a clear edge due to its extensive features, recent positive reviews, and broad integrations, making it suitable for hotels that need dependable, comprehensive payment processing.
Choose roommaster Payments if you value support, features, and proven hotel-specific solutions. Opt for PayU Money only if your hotel operates on a very limited budget, in a region where it’s supported, and if you’re comfortable adopting an unreviewed platform.
For most hotels seeking stability, comprehensive features, and support, roommaster Payments is the safer, smarter investment.
Os precos de Software de processamento de pagamentos raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| PayU Money |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, PayU e roommaster Payments compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | PayU Money |
|
|---|---|---|
| Aceita Visa | ||
| Ajustes de autorização | ||
| Captura Parcial | ||
| Função Gratuidade | ||
| Gestão de reembolso | ||
| Pague por Link |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 1 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. PayU e roommaster Payments compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Payments Processing Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. PayU oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto roommaster Payments oferece 56. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. roommaster Payments lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.2/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
PayU: Nao. roommaster Payments: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Payments Processing Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. PayU Money tem um HT Score de 0 e roommaster tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Recomendações personalizadas para o seu imóvel.