The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
VIPS se destaca .
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 887 | 0 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Mews mais valorizam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility, enquanto os usuarios do VIPS destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #3 329 avaliacoes | — |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #1 397 avaliacoes | — |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #3 45 avaliacoes | — |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #3 49 avaliacoes | — |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 avaliacoes | — |
| Luxo ▾ | #5 220 avaliacoes | — |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #2 170 avaliacoes | — |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #1 130 avaliacoes | — |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #8 106 avaliacoes | — |
| Europa ▾ | #1 660 avaliacoes | — |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | #10 17 avaliacoes | — |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | #28 8 avaliacoes | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to find a solution that streamlines operations, improves guest experiences, and offers robust integrations. Both Mews PMS and VIPS PMS aim to meet these needs, but they differ significantly in maturity, user feedback, and ecosystem support. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your hotel's size, complexity, and growth plans.
Mews PMS boasts a proven track record with thousands of reviews, high user ratings, and recent positive feedback, making it the more reliable choice for modern hoteliers. VIPS PMS, while offering a broad feature set, lacks recent reviews or a large user base, which diminishes confidence in its current performance.
Mews PMS is the clear leader based on review volume, recent user experiences, and a comprehensive feature set that appeals to a broad spectrum of hotels. Its 758 reviews and 98 recent ones in the last six months demonstrate ongoing customer satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Meanwhile, VIPS PMS has no recent reviews or user ratings available, making it difficult to assess its current effectiveness.
If your hotel values proven stability, extensive ecosystem integrations, and a platform trusted by thousands of properties, Mews is the better choice. For hotels seeking a less proven but potentially adaptable solution, VIPS may be worth exploring, but its lack of recent feedback is a concern.
Both Mews and VIPS aim to automate and simplify hotel operations, but Mews’s established presence provides a more reliable foundation supported by hundreds of reviews and high ratings. Mews excels in streamlining reservations, billing, and guest communication, with a focus on modern, cloud-native hospitality.
VIPS, on the other hand, claims to be an all-in-one, modular system designed to handle bookings, communications, meetings, and self-service check-ins, but lacks recent user feedback to verify its performance. Do you want a platform with recent, proven performance, or are you comfortable testing a less documented solution?
If your hotel needs a mature, widely adopted platform with proven reliability and extensive integrations, go with Mews. Its user base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and larger properties, with a 4.62/5 overall rating backed by 758 reviews and a recent influx of feedback.
Choose VIPS if you prefer an all-in-one, modular solution that promises flexibility for managing bookings, meetings, and self-service options. However, given the lack of recent reviews and only 11 verified partners, VIPS’s current performance remains uncertain for most hoteliers.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile app. Many mention how staff adoption is smooth, with support teams offering helpful onboarding, making training less burdensome.
VIPS offers a modern interface with a broad feature set, but lacks recent user feedback to confirm usability and onboarding experience. Without recent reviews, assessing its ease of use remains speculative.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews offers 45 shared features with other PMS solutions and 14 features exclusive to it, such as multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated ID scanner, online checkout, and SOC2 compliance. Its marketplace boasts over 1,000 integrations, covering various operational needs.
VIPS provides a broad feature set including online bookings, guest communications, and self-service check-ins but has no unique features documented outside its core offerings. Currently, Mews’s extensive ecosystem and unique features give it an edge.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with many reviews praising the professionalism, responsiveness, and helpful onboarding assistance. Users note that issues are addressed swiftly, though some mention occasional bugs, which are typically resolved quickly.
VIPS offers no recent reviews or detailed support ratings, which makes evaluating their support quality impossible. Given Mews’s documented support strengths, it remains the more dependable choice.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews has 336 verified integration partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RevControl, and Orange Hotel Marketing, enabling extensive customization. Its marketplace offers a broad range of third-party tools for revenue management, guest engagement, and operations.
VIPS has only 11 verified partners, including some overlaps with Mews (RevControl, SiteMinder), but fewer options overall. For scalable, flexible integrations, Mews’s ecosystem is clearly superior.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s reviews consistently highlight its ease of use, reliability, and support, resulting in an overall rating of 4.62/5 with 93% likelihood to recommend. It is favored across property types, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and independent hotels.
VIPS has no recent or substantial reviews, so hotel ratings cannot be confidently assessed. Based on available data, Mews’s user ratings are significantly higher and more recent.
Edge: Mews PMS.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900 per month, with no freemium or per-room charges, offering transparent and enterprise-grade pricing. VIPS charges $800 per month, also without additional fees but with less transparency about optional costs.
While both are similar, Mews’s larger ecosystem and proven ROI justify its slightly higher price point for most hotels. The decision should consider value and support quality rather than price alone.
Mews is a mature, extensively reviewed PMS platform with proven reliability, boasting a 4.62/5 rating from 758 reviews, and a rich ecosystem of integrations. Its focus on automation, guest experience, and scalability makes it suitable for a wide range of hotel types, especially those looking to grow or modernize.
VIPS offers a broad, modular solution with potential flexibility, but the absence of recent reviews and limited partner network raise concerns about current performance and support. If stability and proven results matter most, Mews is the clear choice.
For hotels needing a trusted, fast-growing platform with a strong community, Mews delivers on expectations. If your hotel prefers a newer, flexible approach and is willing to test an emerging system, VIPS may be worth consideration—but proceed cautiously.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $800/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Mews PMS e VIPS PMS compartilham 45 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Aplicativo móvel | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 2 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Mews PMS e VIPS PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Mews PMS oferece 336 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto VIPS PMS oferece 11. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Mews PMS: Nao. VIPS PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Mews tem um HT Score de 99 e VIPS tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos