The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Acigroup se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Acigroup mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Acigroup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system is critical for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both Acigrup PMS and Mews PMS aim to streamline operations, but their core differences are striking: Acigrup offers a less proven, less reviewed product, while Mews provides a highly rated, widely adopted platform with a robust ecosystem. With more recent reviews and a larger user base, Mews is clearly the more reliable choice. Are you ready to prioritize proven technology and extensive support?
Both systems address fundamental hotel management needs—reservations, check-ins, billing, and housekeeping—but they diverge sharply in maturity and feature depth. Acigrup PMS, with zero reviews and no recent user feedback, offers little transparency on its capabilities or scalability, leaving hoteliers in the dark about its true performance. Meanwhile, Mews PMS boasts over 750 recent reviews, a 4.62/5 overall rating, and a 93% likelihood to recommend, making its proven track record clear. Which system aligns with your need for stability and proven success?
Acigrup’s lack of recent data suggests it’s an untested option, whereas Mews leads with a comprehensive cloud-native platform supported by a vast ecosystem of integrations. Mews’s features include over 59 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and digital ordering—none of which Acigrup currently offers or has demonstrated. Do you want a reliable platform with proven capabilities, or a product with little market validation?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record and extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews. Its customer base includes boutique, city-center, and hostel properties, with many praising its ease of automation and guest experience features. Conversely, if your hotel is a small, simple operation willing to risk unverified technology with no recent reviews, Acigrup might seem attractive, but its lack of support and functionality makes it less advisable.
Given that Mews has significantly more reviews—758 compared to none for Acigrup—and consistently high ratings, it’s the stronger choice for hotels seeking reliability, scalability, and ongoing innovation. Do you prefer investing in a platform with clear validation, or taking a gamble on an untested system?
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews from a diverse array of hotels, highlighting its modern interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers describe it as “intuitive,” “thoughtfully designed,” and “easy to adapt,” even for staff with limited tech experience. In contrast, Acigrup’s usability is untested, with no recent reviews, making it impossible to judge whether it will be simple for your team.
The Mews onboarding process is supported by detailed training and responsive support, which many users praise for minimizing ramp-up time. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 59 exclusive features including revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and an extensive marketplace of over 1,000 integrations, making it ideal for modern, tech-driven hotels. Acigrup, with no documented features or third-party integrations, provides no evidence of comparable capabilities. Its lack of data makes assessing its potential features impossible.
For hotels wanting a fully integrated, scalable system with advanced automation, Mews’s feature set is unmatched. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s customer support receives a 4.27/5 rating from over 98 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising their rapid response and helpful training. Many note that issues are addressed swiftly, and support is proactive in onboarding. Conversely, Acigrup’s support is unreviewed and unverified, with no recent feedback to suggest it can meet your hotel’s needs.
Given the importance of reliable support in technology adoption, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified third-party partners—including channel managers, POS, revenue tools, and more—allowing for flexible customization. Acigrup has zero verified integrations documented, limiting its capability to adapt to your existing tech environment.
The extensive ecosystem of Mews ensures your hotel can scale and innovate without being locked into a siloed system. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5, based on 758 recent reviews, indicates strong user satisfaction across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and city-center properties. Hotels frequently mention its ease of use, automation, and support as key strengths. Acigrup, with no reviews, offers no data on user satisfaction.
The recent positive feedback for Mews demonstrates its reliability and value in the field. Edge: Mews.
Acigrup’s pricing details are unavailable, and the system appears to be offered without clear pricing models, which raises concerns about transparency. Mews charges a fixed monthly fee of $900, with no implementation or additional fees, providing clear cost expectations.
Given the importance of predictable budgeting and ROI, Mews’s transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a mature, feature-rich platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, supported by recent reviews and a large ecosystem. Its extensive automation, integrations, and proven support make it the clear choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence today and scalability tomorrow.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-reviewed, and continuously innovating PMS, choose Mews. Its vast ecosystem and user satisfaction ensure your investment will support growth, efficiency, and guest loyalty.
However, if your operation is very small, with minimal needs, and you’re comfortable risking support and future scalability, Acigrup could be considered. But without recent validation, it’s a gamble.
In conclusion, go with Mews for peace of mind, proven results, and a future-proof platform that adapts to your needs.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Acigroup |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Acigrup PMS e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Acigroup |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Acigrup PMS e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Acigrup PMS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Acigrup PMS: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Acigroup tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos