ASI PMS vs. Shiji Daylight PMS:
Qual e o Ideal para Voce?

The Decision

Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Both ASI PMS by Anand Systems Inc. and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to simplify hotel management but diverge in their core strengths. ASI is known for its straightforward, user-friendly interface and deep reporting, while Shiji offers a broader feature set with more integrations and global reach. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?

Is ASI PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS Better for Hotels?

Both ASI PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS serve as comprehensive solutions for hotel management, but they address different hotel needs. ASI excels in ease of use, stability, and detailed reporting, making it a solid choice for hotels that prioritize operational simplicity and insightful analytics. Shiji, on the other hand, offers a vast array of features and integrations tailored for hotel groups seeking scalability and multi-property management. Do you need a system that’s easy to learn or one packed with advanced features?

ASI has a higher recent review count (26 reviews in the last 6 months) compared to Shiji’s zero recent reviews, indicating more current user feedback and confidence. While Shiji boasts a broader feature set (57 unique features versus ASI’s 6), its complexity may be overwhelming for smaller hotels or those seeking a straightforward platform. Are your team’s priorities more aligned with user-friendliness or feature breadth?

ASI PMS vs Shiji Daylight PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a robust, easy-to-use PMS with reliable performance and straightforward reporting, go with ASI. It’s particularly suitable for hotels that value operational clarity, detailed analytics, and responsive support, especially in North America and smaller markets. Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger chain or aims for extensive automation, multi-property management, and global integrations, Shiji is the better fit, especially for properties in Europe, Asia, or Africa.

For smaller hotels or those new to PMS technology, ASI’s simplicity and consistent recent reviews make it the safer choice. Larger hotel groups seeking extensive feature options and integrations should lean toward Shiji’s comprehensive ecosystem.

Is ASI PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS Easier to Use?

ASI PMS scores 4.88/5 for ease of use, with reviewers citing its user-friendly, intuitive interface that simplifies daily tasks like check-in, check-out, and reporting. Implementation is rated at 4.69/5, reflecting smooth onboarding and staff adoption, even for those unfamiliar with hotel tech. Users consistently describe ASI as straightforward and easy to teach to new staff.

Shiji PMS scores 4.63/5 in ease of use, with reviews praising its accessible training materials and logical design. However, some users report slower response times, especially during peak periods, which can impact daily operations. While both systems are user-friendly, the clear edge goes to ASI for its more recent, higher-rated ease of use.

Edge: ASI PMS.

Which Has Better Features: ASI PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Shiji PMS offers 57 unique features, far exceeding ASI’s 6, including multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, and a host of automation tools. It also supports advanced modules like housekeeping, rate management, and transaction emails, making it suitable for hotels that want extensive operational control and guest engagement.

ASI’s features are more focused: it offers 6 exclusive tools, including a built-in Booking Engine, Guest CRM, Mobile App, Revenue Management, Channel Manager, and On-premise deployment. These are valuable but less extensive compared to Shiji’s, which has 41 shared features plus its unique modules. Overall, Shiji’s feature count and variety give it a distinct edge for hotels seeking a full-suite platform.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

Which Has Better Customer Support: ASI PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

ASI’s support is rated 4.73/5 with users commending its responsiveness and professionalism. Reviews mention prompt resolution of issues, helpful onboarding, and knowledgeable staff, contributing to smoother transitions and ongoing use.

Shiji’s support scores slightly lower at 4.53/5, with positive comments on the support team's professionalism but some users citing slower response times during peak periods. Given the recent review activity, ASI’s support appears more current and consistent, providing a slight edge.

Edge: ASI PMS.

Which Has More Integrations: ASI PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Shiji has 64 verified integrations, including major partners like Amadeus, Revinate, and Oaky, along with a broad array of hotel-specific modules such as POS and EPoS. Its API-everything approach enables extensive customization and automation for large hotel groups or chains.

ASI offers 18 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Cendyn, and Duetto. While these are significant, the narrower selection means less flexibility for hotels needing complex or diverse integrations.

Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: ASI PMS or Shiji Daylight PMS?

Recent reviews favor ASI, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and higher ratings across categories, especially in ease of use and support. ASI’s 26 recent reviews reflect ongoing satisfaction among hotels in North America and smaller markets.

Shiji’s reviews, though positive, are fewer and less recent, with a 90% likelihood to recommend. Hotels in Europe and Asia particularly appreciate its features, but the overall recent sentiment favors ASI’s more consistent user ratings.

Edge: ASI PMS.

How Much Do ASI PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS Cost?

ASI’s pricing is notably lower at a flat $300, with no implementation or monthly fees, making it attractive for budget-conscious hotels or those seeking straightforward costs. Shiji’s base price is $1,200, with additional costs likely for integrations and modules, reflecting its broader feature set.

Exact ongoing costs for Shiji depend on negotiated contracts, but its higher base fee makes ASI the more accessible choice for smaller or mid-sized hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use ASI PMS?

• Hotels that prioritize ease of use and quick onboarding.
• Small to mid-sized properties seeking reliable, stable operations.
• Hotels in North America or markets where detailed reporting is valued.
• Teams wanting a cost-effective, cloud-based PMS with core features.
• Hotels that prefer a straightforward system without extensive customization.

Not ideal if your hotel needs multi-property management or advanced automation features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Shiji Daylight PMS?

• Large hotel groups or chains requiring extensive integrations.
• Hotels looking for multi-lingual, multi-currency support.
• Properties that want automation and guest engagement tools.
• Hotels in Europe, Asia, or Africa needing regional customization.
• Hotels seeking a scalable platform with broad feature options.
• Teams that want a modern, API-driven PMS that supports growth.

Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple, easy-to-learn system without many integrations.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

ASI PMS is a straightforward, reliable platform ideal for smaller hotels and properties that value ease of use and detailed reporting. Its recent reviews reflect high satisfaction, especially in North America, with a significant focus on stability and support.

Shiji Daylight PMS provides a broader feature set, supporting larger hotel groups with extensive automation, integrations, and global capabilities. While it offers more advanced modules and customization, its user experience can be hampered by slower performance and more complex setup.

If your hotel values simplicity, quick deployment, and current positive feedback, choose ASI PMS. If your operation demands a feature-rich, scalable solution with deep integrations and international support, Shiji Daylight PMS is the better option.