The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 890 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
AutoClerk, Inc. se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and ROI — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 890 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 3 | 887 |
Apos analisar 890 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do AutoClerk, Inc. mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #60 1 avaliacoes | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #54 0 avaliacoes | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #72 1 avaliacoes | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #67 0 avaliacoes | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #64 0 avaliacoes | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #57 1 avaliacoes | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between AutoClerk (PMS) and Mews PMS ultimately hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. AutoClerk offers a straightforward, easy-to-use solution ideal for small to mid-sized independent properties, while Mews provides a broad, integrated platform favored by multi-property groups and tech-forward hotels. Both address core property management needs, but only one is truly designed for modern, scalable hospitality.
Are you looking for a simple, reliable system for a couple of properties or a comprehensive tech ecosystem for rapid growth? Let’s explore how these two products stack up.
AutoClerk has been in the market since 1985, offering a familiar, easy-to-learn system with a focus on core PMS features. Mews, founded in 2012 and now a winner of the HotelTechReport award, emphasizes automation, integrations, and a scalable cloud-native architecture. The key divergence is their review volume and recency: Mews boasts over 750 reviews, 98 from the last six months, and a high 9.12 NPS score, making its customer feedback far more current and extensive than AutoClerk’s three reviews.
AutoClerk’s overall rating of 3.5/5 reflects limited recent praise, while Mews’s 4.62/5 and 99.53/100 HTR Score showcase broad, positive sentiment. Do you want a mature but limited system, or a leading-edge platform with proven recent satisfaction?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cost-effective PMS with dependable support, AutoClerk is suitable—especially for small resorts or standalone properties that prioritize ease of use. Conversely, if you require a flexible, highly integrated platform capable of managing multiple properties, guest engagement, and revenue optimization, Mews is the clear leader, particularly for hotels with growth plans or complex operations.
For boutique hotels or independent resorts seeking simplicity, AutoClerk’s interface and 24/7 support will serve well. But if your hotel aims to modernize operations, scale quickly, or leverage automation, Mews provides more advanced features and a larger partner ecosystem.
AutoClerk’s UI is rated 4.33/5, praised for its simplicity and ease of learning, but some users find its reporting capabilities limited. Mews scores even higher at 4.7/5, with recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive design that minimizes onboarding and training time.
AutoClerk’s onboarding experience is rated 4.33/5, and Mews edges slightly ahead at 4.39/5, reflecting its user-friendly interface and robust support channels. Overall, Mews’s modern UI and frequent updates make it easier for your team to adopt.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s feature set is primarily focused on core PMS functions, lacking the extensive capabilities of Mews’s 59+ features. Mews offers modules for revenue management, CRM, online check-in, mobile housekeeping, digital registration, guest messaging, and advanced reporting, among others.
Notably, Mews supports multi-lingual, multi-currency operations, automated night audits, and a marketplace with over 1,000 integrations—features absent in AutoClerk. If you need sophisticated automation and guest engagement tools, Mews is the superior choice.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s reviews highlight their 24/7 support with quick resolutions, leaving positive impressions about their responsiveness. Mews supports its users with a dedicated onboarding team, extensive online resources, and a support rating of 4.27/5, though some recent reviews mention occasional bugs.
AutoClerk’s limited review count makes it difficult to gauge support consistency, while Mews’s larger user base and recent feedback suggest a more reliable, scalable support experience. For ongoing operational assurance, Mews’s support network is more robust.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk integrates with 8 verified partners, including channel managers and revenue tools, but its ecosystem remains small and less adaptable. Mews’s marketplace features over 336 verified integrations, including major channel managers, POS systems, and revenue tools, providing extensive flexibility.
Shared integrations include SiteMinder, Duetto, and Cendyn, but Mews’s broader ecosystem allows more customization and future-proofing. If integrations and automation matter, Mews’s extensive partner network gives it a clear advantage.
Edge: Mews.
AutoClerk’s reviews are sparse, with only three recent opinions, averaging 3/5, and predominantly small hotel segments. Mews, on the other hand, has nearly 760 reviews, with a 4.62/5 rating from a diverse mix of boutique, independent, and branded hotels, especially in recent months.
Hotels of all types consistently praise Mews for operational ease, automation, and support, whereas AutoClerk’s limited, older reviews suggest less recent satisfaction. For guest satisfaction and modern functionality, Mews scores higher across hotel segments.
AutoClerk does not publicly list its pricing, but historically it has operated on custom quotes, often favoring smaller properties. Mews charges a base fee of $900/month, with no implementation or extra fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
While AutoClerk might be more affordable upfront, Mews’s value lies in its rich feature set and scalability, which can justify the higher price for growing or multi-property hotels. For newer hotels seeking clarity on costs, Mews’s straightforward pricing model is advantageous.
AutoClerk works best for small-scale independent hotels with limited operational complexity.
Mews suits hotels ready to embrace digital transformation and future growth.
AutoClerk is a straightforward, easy-to-use PMS ideal for small, independent properties that need reliable core functionality without the bells and whistles. Its limited recent reviews and narrow ecosystem make it less suited for hotels with complex operations or aggressive growth plans.
Mews, with its extensive features, recent high ratings, and wide integration network, is the better choice for hotels focused on automation, guest experience, and scalability. Its cloud-native architecture and ongoing innovation position it as a future-proof platform for the modern hospitality industry.
If your hotel values ease and familiarity, AutoClerk can serve well. But for those aiming for operational agility and guest-centric technology, Mews is the clear winner.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Autoclerk (PMS) e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Autoclerk (PMS) e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Autoclerk (PMS) oferece 8 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 4.3/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Autoclerk (PMS): Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. AutoClerk, Inc. tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos