The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
ButikSoft se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do ButikSoft mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
When choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel, you want a solution that improves operational efficiency, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Both ButikSoft PMS and Mews PMS aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in their market presence, reviews, and feature sets. Are you looking for a proven, widely adopted platform with modern features? Or are you considering a less-established system with unknown reliability? The choice hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
While ButikSoft claims to serve the hotel industry, it boasts no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its real-world performance. Mews, on the other hand, commands over 750 reviews with an overall rating of 4.62 out of 5, and most recent feedback is highly positive, indicating its standing as a leading PMS provider. Do you want a solution backed by a large, active user base and ongoing support? Or are you comfortable with an untested system?
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations but for entirely different reasons. ButikSoft is a little-known PMS with no recent reviews or ratings, implying limited market traction and unknown functionality. Conversely, Mews is a cloud-based platform with over 750 recent reviews, a high NPS score of 9.12, and a 4.62/5 overall rating, reflecting widespread user satisfaction and consistent updates.
Mews excels in core areas such as ease of use, support, and integrations, backed by a substantial presence in multiple regions—including North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific—serving a diverse hotel portfolio. ButikSoft appears to lack regional coverage and verified integrations, raising questions about its scalability and adaptability. Is your priority to choose a tested, trusted solution or to gamble on an unverified system?
If your hotel needs a reliable, scalable PMS with a vast ecosystem of integrations and proven high performance, go with Mews. Its extensive features, active user community, and industry recognition make it the clear leader. For boutique hotels, hostels, or properties seeking rapid digital transformation, Mews’ modern interface and high user ratings (4.64/5 for boutique hotels) make it the better choice.
If your hotel operates at a small scale and prefers to explore untested options or has very niche requirements, ButikSoft might be worth considering—though the lack of recent reviews makes this a risky play. For most hotels, especially those planning growth, Mews provides more certainty, proven performance, and ongoing innovation.
Mews offers a highly-rated user interface with a 4.7/5 ease of use score and recent reviews praising its intuitive design and quick onboarding process. Support experiences are positive, with many users noting prompt, helpful assistance and comprehensive onboarding valued at a 4.39/5 rating.
ButikSoft, however, has no publicly available ratings or recent reviews, making usability assumptions impossible. Its lack of feedback suggests uncertainty about whether staff adoption or onboarding will be smooth. Edge: Mews.
Mews provides an extensive suite of over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, integrated CRS, guest CRM, online check-in, automated night audit, task management, and real-time reporting. Its marketplace offers over 1,000 integrations, supporting a flexible, dynamic hotel ecosystem.
In contrast, ButikSoft claims no exclusive features and offers no verified integrations. Its limited feature set, combined with no recent reviews, means it likely lacks the depth and sophistication needed for modern hotel management. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews highlighting quick responses, helpful onboarding, and continuous platform improvements. Users report that Mews support is a key factor in their satisfaction, especially with their 24/7 live chat and dedicated onboarding.
ButikSoft offers no verifiable support ratings or recent user feedback, leaving its support quality uncertain. Without recent reviews, you cannot confidently gauge its responsiveness or effectiveness. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its open API and expansive marketplace allow hotels to customize and scale their tech stack efficiently.
ButikSoft has no listed verified partners, and with no recent reviews or mention of integrations, it’s unlikely to meet the needs of hotels requiring seamless connectivity. Edge: Mews.
Mews consistently receives high ratings across segments, with a 4.64/5 average from 679 reviews, and an overall NPS of 9.12/5. Hoteliers in boutique, independent, and branded hotels praise its ease of use, reliability, and support.
ButikSoft has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the data, Mews’s established reputation suggests it is the preferred choice among hoteliers. Edge: Mews.
Mews charges a flat $900 monthly subscription, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options, which suggests a clear pricing structure for medium to large hotels. ButikSoft’s pricing is unavailable, and no trial information exists, indicating opacity or potential hidden costs.
For hotels seeking transparent, predictable pricing, Mews’s model provides clarity. Without pricing data, ButikSoft remains an uncertain option.
Mews is a comprehensive, well-rated PMS trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, with a proven track record of high guest satisfaction and operational efficiency. Its extensive features, integrations, and support make it the clear choice for hotels serious about growth and innovation.
Choose Mews if you want a modern, reliable system with a strong market presence, active user feedback, and ongoing updates. It’s especially suitable if your hotel values scalability, automation, and a thriving ecosystem.
ButikSoft, lacking recent reviews and verified features, remains an uncertain option. It could be considered only by niche hotels with specific needs or those willing to accept the risks of an untested platform.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Mews offers a safer, more proven path to operational excellence and guest satisfaction. Its reputation, feature depth, and support infrastructure make it the definitive choice in today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| ButikSoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, ButikSoft PMS e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | ButikSoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. ButikSoft PMS e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. ButikSoft PMS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
ButikSoft PMS: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. ButikSoft tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos