The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
dihotel se destaca .
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do dihotel mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| dihotel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both dihotel by dihotel and HotelTime PMS aim to streamline operations, but their capabilities and market presence differ notably. This guide will help you understand which solution better fits your hotel’s specific needs and future growth plans.
Dihotel offers a straightforward approach, designed to cover core PMS functions with a focus on operational coherence for smaller to mid-sized hotels. However, with zero reviews and no recent user feedback, it lacks the validation that HotelTime PMS’s more extensive track record provides. HotelTime, on the other hand, boasts over 433 reviews, a 4.83/5 overall rating, and recent user insights, making it a more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
While dihotel’s limited presence suggests it might be suitable for very niche or specialized hotels, HotelTime’s broader regional coverage and resilient reputation make it a more viable option across diverse markets. Do you prefer a system with proven user satisfaction and ongoing support, or are you considering an untested solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive yet simple PMS to manage reservations, billing, and housekeeping without extensive third-party integrations, dihotel could be considered. But if your hotel requires a feature-rich platform that supports a wide variety of operations—including POS, CRM, revenue management, and automation—HotelTime is the clear choice.
For boutique hotels, small resorts, or properties with limited technology needs, dihotel might seem appealing for its simplicity. Larger or growing hotels seeking extensive features, integrations, and proven support should go with HotelTime, which is trusted by over 650 properties globally and boasts a highly rated support team.
HotelTime’s interface receives a 4.66/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive layout and straightforward operation. The onboarding process, rated at 4.63/5, is generally smooth, and staff adoption is aided by clear workflows and support.
Dihotel, on the other hand, has no existing user feedback or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Without reviews, the best assumption is that it may lack the polish and user-friendliness of HotelTime. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime offers over 51 unique features, including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, online check-in, group management, and automation tools like night audit and task reminders. Its modular design supports extensive customization and third-party integrations, making it suitable for complex hotel operations.
Dihotel provides no documented features or integrations, which suggests it offers only basic functionalities. Without detailed feature sets or user testimonials, HotelTime’s extensive capabilities clearly set the standard. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s support team consistently receives high praise, with a 4.73/5 rating in recent reviews. Guests mention quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing assistance, which are critical for smooth operations.
There is no available support rating or recent feedback for dihotel. Relying on a product with zero reviews and no support history is risky. HotelTime’s proven support gives it the edge. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including booking engines, POS, revenue management, and various third-party tools like Profitroom and STR. This extensive ecosystem enables a scalable, interconnected tech stack.
Dihotel lacks verified integrations or partner connections, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. For properties seeking flexibility and future growth options, HotelTime’s integrations are a significant advantage. Edge: HotelTime.
With 433 reviews in the last six months, HotelTime holds a 4.83/5 overall rating and a 9.26/10 NPS score, reflecting strong user satisfaction. Hoteliers of all segments—especially resorts and city-center hotels—rate HotelTime highly for its usability and support.
Dihotel has no reviews or recent ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the extensive recent feedback for HotelTime, it clearly has the higher reputation among users. Edge: HotelTime.
Dihotel’s pricing details are unavailable, hinting it might be a custom or less transparent solution. Meanwhile, HotelTime charges a straightforward $600 monthly fee, with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its established market presence.
Without clear pricing for dihotel, HotelTime’s transparent cost structure allows you to evaluate ROI confidently. For budget-conscious hotels, this clarity can influence your decision. Edge: HotelTime.
Dihotel may suit very basic operational needs but is less suitable for hotels seeking a future-proof, feature-rich platform.
HotelTime’s broad feature set and international presence make it a versatile choice for mid-sized to large properties seeking operational efficiency.
The core difference between these two solutions is their market validation and feature set. dihotel offers a basic, untested platform with no recent reviews or proven support, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
HotelTime, with over 430 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.83/5, establishes itself as a trusted, feature-rich PMS suitable for diverse property types. It supports extensive integrations, automation, and provides reliable support, making it the preferred option for hotels that want proven technology and ongoing success.
If your hotel values reliability, a broad feature set, and a track record of satisfied users, HotelTime is the clear winner. However, if your needs are very basic, and you’re willing to accept the risks of an unreviewed system, dihotel could be considered—but with caution.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| dihotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, dihotel e HotelTime PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Visualização do calendário |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 39 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. dihotel e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. dihotel oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
dihotel: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. dihotel tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos