The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Eptera se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como On premise.
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $1,100/mo | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Eptera mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Eptera PMS by Eptera and Mews PMS by Mews aim to address core hospitality management challenges, but they differ markedly in market presence, features, and user feedback. Your decision should hinge on which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Eptera offers a modular, on-premise solution, while Mews delivers a cloud-native, highly scalable system with extensive integrations. Given the current review data and recent feedback, which product will truly support your hotel’s future?
Eptera PMS is an emerging, Turkish-founded system with a comprehensive modular approach, allowing you to select only the functionalities you need. However, with no recent reviews and a zero-star rating, its market traction and user feedback are virtually nonexistent.
In contrast, Mews PMS boasts over 758 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 overall rating, reflecting broad adoption and trusted performance across diverse hotel types. Its user-friendly design and extensive integration ecosystem have earned industry praise, making it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven technology.
Do you want a lesser-known, potentially customizable system, or a widely adopted, highly rated platform with proven success?
If your hotel requires a flexible, cloud-based system with extensive third-party integrations, go with Mews. Its marketplace of over 1,000 partners and strong support for automation make it ideal for scalable operations, especially if you plan multi-property growth or want real-time data access.
If your hotel needs a modular, on-premise platform and is comfortable with a less proven ecosystem, Eptera could suffice. But given the absence of recent reviews and the lack of detailed user feedback, Mews clearly has the edge for hotels seeking a dependable, modern platform.
For hotels prioritizing stability, extensive integrations, and proven customer satisfaction, Mews is the clear choice.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training. Users highlight its modern design and straightforward workflows, making staff adoption swift and seamless.
Eptera, on the other hand, has a zero rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews to validate its user experience. Its on-premise nature and limited feedback suggest it may require more effort to implement and learn.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 50 shared features, including automation, reservations, billing, and guest communications. Its unique features include multi-lingual support, guest CRM, integrated payment terminals, tablet/kiosk check-in, and ID scanning—features that Eptera does not provide.
Eptera’s only standout features are its on-premise deployment and a spa & wellness module, but these are niche compared to Mews’ broad functionality. Mews's extensive feature set and third-party marketplace give it a significant advantage.
Edge: Mews.
Mews, with a 4.27/5 support rating and recent reviews emphasizing its responsiveness, is praised for its onboarding and ongoing assistance. Hoteliers mention their support team’s quick problem resolution and helpful onboarding processes.
Eptera, with no recent reviews, offers no verified support feedback. Its recent market entry and lack of customer testimonials suggest support may be untested at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue management, and POS solutions. Its open API and marketplace facilitate customization, making it adaptable for diverse operational needs.
Eptera’s integration count is limited to just one verified partner—SiteMinder—indicating a less mature ecosystem. For hotels relying on diverse integrations, Mews provides a decisive advantage.
Edge: Mews.
With 98 recent reviews, Mews has a 4.62/5 rating, with hoteliers across segments like boutique hotels, hostels, and city center hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and support. Hotels of different sizes and types rate it highly for operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
Eptera has no recent reviews or ratings, rendering it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on available data, Mews clearly leads in hotel trust and satisfaction.
Edge: Mews.
Eptera’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $1,100 without a trial or freemium options. Mews charges a $900 monthly base fee, with no implementation or setup costs disclosed.
Considering the extensive features and support, Mews’s pricing offers strong value, especially given its proven track record.
Not ideal if you seek extensive integrations, proven support, or a cloud-based solution.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers on-premise solutions or has minimal staffing for setup.
Mews offers a cloud-based, feature-rich platform with proven market success, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. Eptera, while promising, lacks recent reviews and a broad ecosystem, making it a riskier choice in today’s competitive landscape.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and future scalability, go with Mews. It’s the more dependable platform for hotels aiming to improve operations, guest experiences, and revenue.
Choose Eptera only if you require an on-premise solution with specific niche modules and are prepared to navigate untested support and integration waters.
In short, Mews’s recent review volume, high ratings, and extensive feature set solidify its position as the leading option for modern hotels ready to grow.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Eptera PMS e Mews PMS compartilham 50 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Check-in tablet/quiosque | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de spa e bem-estar | ||
| Na premissa | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| Terminal de pagamento integrado e leitor de cartão |
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Eptera PMS e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Eptera PMS oferece 1 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Eptera PMS: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Eptera tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos