The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 254 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Flexkeeping se destaca em customer support and ROI — especialmente para propriedades brand (0.0/5) .
Amadeus se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Mobile access on any device.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 254 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 251 | 3 |
Apos analisar 254 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Flexkeeping mais valorizam task automation, interface amigável, interdepartmental communication, enquanto os usuarios do Amadeus destacam . Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Task Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Interface amigável
▾
|
|
|
+
Interdepartmental Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Problemas de integração do PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
Suporte linguístico
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Software de limpeza para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | #2 32 avaliacoes | #16 0 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | #3 132 avaliacoes | #17 1 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | #4 50 avaliacoes | #15 2 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | #2 32 avaliacoes | #12 0 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #3 96 avaliacoes | #17 1 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | #2 82 avaliacoes | #16 1 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | #3 77 avaliacoes | #17 1 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | #2 37 avaliacoes | #18 0 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | #7 18 avaliacoes | #11 2 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | #2 189 avaliacoes | #14 0 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico | #7 2 avaliacoes | #13 0 avaliacoes |
Both Flexkeeping and Amadeus HotSOS® Housekeeping aim to streamline hotel housekeeping, but they approach this goal differently. Flexkeeping specializes in automating complex scheduling, enhancing communication, and providing detailed analytics, while Amadeus focuses on real-time task management and operational automation. Your choice depends on your hotel’s priorities: deep data insights or rapid real-time task updates.
Flexkeeping boasts a much larger number of recent reviews and a higher overall rating, making it the more reliable option today. Considering the recent feedback and review volume, which product should your team choose to improve operational efficiency?
Flexkeeping and Amadeus both solve hotel housekeeping inefficiencies but diverge in their scope and approach. Flexkeeping offers a flexible, cloud-based suite designed to handle complex cleaning schemas, automate scheduling, and track multiple departments with a focus on analytics and customization. Amadeus, meanwhile, emphasizes real-time task prioritization, faster room turnover, and automated workflows primarily through its mobile app and PMS integration.
Flexkeeping’s 219 reviews, mostly recent, emphasize ease of use, analytics, and staff engagement, reinforcing its strong presence in hotel operations management. Amadeus, with only three reviews and no recent feedback, appears less current but is praised for its real-time task visibility. Given this, which platform better aligns with your hotel’s need for ongoing operational insights versus immediate task management?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, user-friendly platform that automates scheduling, improves cross-department communication, and provides in-depth analytics, choose Flexkeeping. Its proven track record and high review volume—42 reviews in the last six months—indicate ongoing support and development.
If your team prioritizes real-time task tracking, rapid deployment, and direct PMS integration without extensive analytics, Amadeus may be sufficient. However, with only three reviews and no recent feedback, Flexkeeping clearly holds the edge for hotels seeking reliable, current support and proven performance.
Flexkeeping is rated 4.91/5 for ease of use, praised for its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and mobile accessibility. Recent reviews highlight that staff find it simple to adapt, and its cloud-based design allows rapid training and implementation.
Amadeus, with a perfect 5/5 rating for ease of use, is also highly regarded for its intuitive mobile app and straightforward task management. Nonetheless, with only a handful of reviews and no recent feedback, Flexkeeping’s larger and more current review base makes its usability reputation more trustworthy.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping offers a core set of 18 features, with no exclusive features, focusing on automation and communication within housekeeping workflows. Amadeus provides 17 features, including advanced modules such as lost & found, late checkouts, preventative maintenance, deep cleaning, and analytics dashboard—many designed for broader operational oversight.
Amadeus’s unique features—like real-time task tracking, case management, and open API—are valuable for hotels requiring detailed operational control. However, with 18 shared features and Flexkeeping’s proven deployment, the edge goes to Flexkeeping for simplicity and proven feature execution.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping’s support ratings (4.85/5) and recent reviews emphasize fast, helpful responses, with users describing its support team as "timely and reliable." Reviewers appreciate its proactive development and continuous improvements, which contribute to smooth onboarding and ongoing assistance.
Amadeus, with a support rating of only 1.83/5 and reviews citing slow responses and difficulties reaching account managers, falls behind. The recent feedback underscores issues with responsiveness and unresolved support tickets, making Flexkeeping the clear winner here.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping integrates with 24 verified partners, including popular PMS and guest experience systems like RoomKey, Cloudbeds, and Beds24. Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including major industry players like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and RevControl, offering broader compatibility.
If your hotel relies on specific integrations, Amadeus’s extensive partner list may be advantageous. However, Flexkeeping’s targeted integrations and recent positive feedback on connectivity suggest a more reliable experience for most users.
Edge: Amadeus.
Flexkeeping’s reviews, totaling 219 with 42 in the last six months, consistently rate it near perfect—4.98/5 overall and a 9.79/5 NPS score—showing strong user satisfaction. Recent hotel segment data indicates high ratings from luxury, boutique, and resort properties, with many praising its simplicity and efficiency.
Amadeus, with only three reviews and no recent feedback, has a 4/5 overall score. Its limited review base makes it less reliable, but existing comments acknowledge its ease of management and helpfulness.
Given the volume and recency, Flexkeeping’s ratings are more representative of current hotel experiences.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping is priced at a straightforward $400 per month with no implementation fee or freemium options, offering transparent value. Amadeus does not publicly list its pricing, which often indicates customized quotes based on hotel size and needs, making direct comparison difficult.
Your team should budget for Flexkeeping’s predictable flat fee, while contacting Amadeus for tailored pricing. Given the transparency and positive ROI stories, Flexkeeping offers clearer value.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers extensive third-party integrations outside the existing partner network or if you need highly specialized modules like deep cleaning or preventative maintenance (which are only in Amadeus).
Not ideal if your hotel values a highly rated, recent-support-driven platform or prefers a system with a simpler, more focused feature set.
Flexkeeping and Amadeus serve distinct hotel needs: the former excels in automation, analytics, and ease of use, while the latter offers extensive real-time task management and broad integrations. Flexkeeping, with its larger, more recent review base, and a score of 4.98/5 overall, is the more reliable choice for hotels seeking to streamline and elevate their housekeeping operations today.
Choose Flexkeeping if your hotel values user-friendly automation, detailed analytics, and strong support. Opt for Amadeus if your property requires extensive integrations and real-time task visibility, especially across multiple locations.
For most hotels looking to improve operational clarity and staff productivity with proven technology, Flexkeeping remains the top recommendation. Its recent reviews and higher ratings confirm it as the more dependable, future-proof solution for your team.
Os precos de Software de limpeza raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Flexkeeping - Housekeeping Suite e Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping compartilham 18 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de tarefas em tempo real | ||
| Check-outs tardios | ||
| Diário de bordo virtual | ||
| Limpeza profunda | ||
| Módulo de achados e perdidos | ||
| Módulo de manutenção preventiva |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 5 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
"Flexkeeping completely transformed our workflow which led to an 80% reduction in the workload, simplifying processes and massively lowering our stress levels!"
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Every comment a guest makes gets immediately communicated throughout the whole hotel. Since it’s such a transparent platform, staff can react instantly, and management can stay inf..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Flexkeeping automates room and task assignments, saving significant time in morning routines and throughout the day. Users appreciate the ease of task... Flexkeeping automates room and task assignments, saving significant time in morning routines and throughout the day. Users appreciate the ease of task reallocation and the reduction in manual scheduling efforts, resulting in more efficient housekeeping operations.
O Flexkeeping foi projetado para ser fácil de usar, permitindo que os funcionários aprendam e naveguem rapidamente por seus recursos. Isso reduz o tem... O Flexkeeping foi projetado para ser fácil de usar, permitindo que os funcionários aprendam e naveguem rapidamente por seus recursos. Isso reduz o tempo de treinamento e auxilia na integração de novos membros da equipe, promovendo a inclusão de funcionários independentemente de seu nível de conhecimento tecnológico.
The platform enhances communication between housekeeping, reception, and technical services, reducing delays and errors. Real-time connectivity helps... The platform enhances communication between housekeeping, reception, and technical services, reducing delays and errors. Real-time connectivity helps maintain operational transparency and supports seamless cross-department collaboration.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Alguns usuários relatam problemas ocasionais de conectividade com a integração do PMS, o que afeta a sincronização perfeita dos dados. Melhorias nessa... Alguns usuários relatam problemas ocasionais de conectividade com a integração do PMS, o que afeta a sincronização perfeita dos dados. Melhorias nessa área poderiam aprimorar a consistência dos dados e a eficiência operacional.
Embora a plataforma seja elogiada pela sua usabilidade, os usuários indicam a necessidade de opções de idioma ampliadas para atender às equipes multil... Embora a plataforma seja elogiada pela sua usabilidade, os usuários indicam a necessidade de opções de idioma ampliadas para atender às equipes multilíngues. Essa melhoria poderia simplificar o treinamento e as operações diárias para equipes com diferentes formações linguísticas.
Melhor classificado em
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Flexkeeping - Housekeeping Suite e Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Housekeeping Software, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Flexkeeping - Housekeeping Suite oferece 24 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping oferece 104. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping lidera em facilidade de uso com 5.0/5 vs 4.9/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Flexkeeping - Housekeeping Suite: Nao. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Housekeeping Software oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Flexkeeping tem um HT Score de 100 e Amadeus tem 0. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos