The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
Flyhotel se destaca .
Mews se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades independent (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 887 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 887 |
Apos analisar 887 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do Flyhotel mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do Mews destacam ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
| Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Integração e suporte
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Relatórios e análises
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 329 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #1 397 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 45 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #3 49 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #5 220 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #2 170 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #1 130 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte ▾ | — | #8 106 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #1 660 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #10 17 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #28 8 avaliacoes |
Choosing between Flyhotel by Flyhotel and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, scale, and tech ambitions. While Flyhotel is a lesser-known system with limited reviews and features, Mews offers a comprehensive, scalable platform trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Both aim to streamline your front desk and reservation processes, but their capabilities and support differ significantly. Are you ready to prioritize a proven, widely supported system?
Flyhotel is a small, niche PMS with zero ratings and no recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge its reliability or suitability. In contrast, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with 98 recent ones, reflecting current user experiences and ongoing development. The stark difference in review volume and recency makes Mews the more dependable choice for hotels seeking consistent support and innovation.
Both systems aim to automate reservations, check-ins, and reporting, but Mews’s extensive features and user feedback suggest a higher level of maturity. Flyhotel’s lack of a market presence and reviews means it likely lacks the robustness and integrations that modern hotels increasingly rely on. Would you risk operational uncertainty with Flyhotel, or lean on Mews’s extensive proven track record?
If your hotel needs a cloud-based, scalable system with over 336 verified integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its client base spans boutique hotels, hostels, and large chains, with high ratings for ease of use, support, and value. For hotels focused on growth, automation, and guest experience, Mews’s extensive feature set and global presence make it the superior option.
Flyhotel might appeal if your property operates in a very niche market or if budget constraints prohibit investing in a more comprehensive platform. However, with zero reviews and no clear pricing or feature roadmap, it’s unlikely to meet the demands of a modern, tech-forward hotel. Are you comfortable with an untested system, or do you prefer a platform with proven results?
Mews’s user-friendly interface and highly rated onboarding (4.39/5 from 98 recent reviews) make it accessible for staff at all levels. Hotels praise Mews for its intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal training time. Flyhotel’s lack of reviews prevents a direct usability comparison, but its absence in the market suggests it may not match Mews’s polished, proven user experience.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 unique features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, housekeeping, revenue management, online check-in, real-time reporting, and extensive integrations. Flyhotel’s feature set is unlisted, implying it may lack the depth and breadth needed for complex operations.
Mews’s marketplace alone provides access to over 1,000 integrations, including POS, revenue tools, and channel managers, making it highly adaptable. Flyhotel’s limited or unknown feature offerings make it unlikely to support sophisticated or multi-channel operations.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings (4.27/5 from recent reviews) highlight responsive, helpful assistance during onboarding and ongoing use. Customers frequently mention Mews’s support as a key factor in their satisfaction, with some reporting issues but quick resolutions.
Flyhotel’s review absence means support quality cannot be assessed, but lesser-known or unreviewed solutions often lack dedicated, responsive support. Given the importance of support in day-to-day operations, Mews’s established reputation makes it the safer choice.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and payment processors. Its open API and marketplace provide extensive customization options, accommodating various tech ecosystems.
Flyhotel has zero verified integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with other essential hotel systems. For a modern, flexible operation, this makes Mews the clear winner.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s review count and recent feedback (98 reviews in the last six months, 4.62/5 overall) outshine Flyhotel’s nonexistent reviews. Hotels across segments—from boutique to large chains—appreciate Mews’s ease of use, support, and feature richness.
Flyhotel’s lack of reviews means there’s no reliable data on user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. For a property that values peer feedback, Mews’s high ratings are decisive.
Edge: Mews.
Flyhotel’s pricing details are unavailable, and it appears to lack a free trial or transparent fee structure. Mews charges a base price of $900 monthly, with no implementation or setup fees, and offers a clear SaaS model.
Given the lack of pricing clarity for Flyhotel, Mews’s straightforward model and value-based ratings (4.39/5 for ROI) make it the more predictable investment for your hotel’s budget.
Not ideal if your hotel values reliability, features, or scalability, especially in multi-property environments.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a very simple, manual, or offline context, or if you’re looking for a free or very low-cost solution without support.
Mews’s core advantage is its proven track record, comprehensive features, and extensive integrations, backed by thousands of positive reviews and ongoing updates. It’s designed for hotels that want reliable, scalable operations with a focus on automation and guest satisfaction.
Choose Mews if you need a system that supports your growth, provides excellent support, and offers a rich ecosystem of third-party tools. Its high review volume and recent positive feedback make it the clear choice, especially for hotels that want to avoid operational risks.
Flyhotel may suit very small, niche properties with minimal tech needs, but the lack of reviews, features, and support makes it a risky choice. If your hotel plans to grow or prioritize guest experience, Mews’s established platform is the smarter investment.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
| Flyhotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, Flyhotel e Mews PMS compartilham 0 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade | Flyhotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| CRM convidado | ||
| Motor de reservas | ||
| Multi Moeda | ||
| Multilíngue | ||
| Módulo de gestão de receitas | ||
| Perfis de convidados |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 47 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
O que os hoteleiros adoram
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatóri... Embora a Mews ofereça funcionalidades sólidas de relatórios e análises, diversas avaliações mencionam a necessidade de recursos de geração de relatórios mais personalizáveis e flexíveis. Os usuários expressam o desejo de obter insights de dados mais detalhados, principalmente em análises de reservas e receitas.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. Flyhotel e Mews PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. Flyhotel oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto Mews PMS oferece 335. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. Mews PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
Flyhotel: Nao. Mews PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. Flyhotel tem um HT Score de 0 e Mews tem 100. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos