The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
GODO se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest CRM and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $1,100/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do GODO mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly influence your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both GODO and HotelTime PMS aim to streamline hotel management but do so with different approaches and strengths. Your decision hinges on which features, support, and scalability align best with your property's needs.
GODO offers a simplified, automation-focused platform with a smaller but growing user base, primarily specializing in vacation rentals. HotelTime provides a large-scale, fully integrated PMS with extensive features and a global presence. Which of these aligns with your hotel’s trajectory?
GODO, founded in 2012, caters mainly to vacation rental and smaller property operators, emphasizing automation and guest communication. HotelTime, established in 2002, serves a broad range of hotel types, including resorts and large chains, offering a more feature-rich environment.
While GODO’s reviews are limited and lack recent data, HotelTime boasts over 430 reviews in the past six months, with a 4.83/5 overall rating. HotelTime’s recent reviews underscore its robust support and ongoing feature improvements, making it the more reliable choice for current market needs.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, automation-centered PMS focused on guest communication and simplified operations, GODO might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited feature set (only 3 unique features) suggest it’s better suited for small vacation rental managers or property portfolios that prioritize automation over depth.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a comprehensive platform with extensive modules like POS, CRM, revenue management, and integrations, HotelTime should be your go-to. It’s proven in diverse hotel segments, from boutique to large resorts, with a clear focus on operational efficiency and scalability.
For most hotels looking for a proven, well-supported solution with a broad feature set, HotelTime is the safer investment.
GODO’s reviews do not detail UI or onboarding experiences, but with no recent feedback, its ease of use remains uncertain. HotelTime, on the other hand, scores a 4.66/5 in ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive interface and quick onboarding.
Many hotel staff find HotelTime’s system easy to adopt, facilitating quick training and daily operations. Its support team’s responsiveness further simplifies the learning curve, giving it a clear edge.
GODO offers only 3 unique features: guest communication (SMS), centralized messaging, and guest messaging—simple but limited. HotelTime provides 20 features unique to its platform, including online check-in, digital registration, spa & wellness modules, revenue management, and integrated ID scanning.
HotelTime’s broader feature set supports full property operations, from guest engagement to revenue optimization. Its numerous modules make it more versatile and capable of handling complex hotel needs.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO’s support ratings and review details are unavailable, raising questions about its responsiveness and onboarding quality. HotelTime, however, has a support score of 4.73/5, with many reviews praising its quick response and helpful staff.
HotelTime’s recent reviews mention prompt assistance, comprehensive onboarding, and ongoing support, which are critical for smooth hotel operations. Its dedicated support team gives it the clear advantage here.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO has five verified partners, including AeroGuest and Profitroom, with a few exclusive integrations like TourDesk and Sweeply. HotelTime boasts 58 verified integrations, including common partners like AeroGuest and Profitroom, plus a wide array of additional systems like Bookboost, STR, and Umi Digital.
The extensive list of HotelTime’s integrations enables your hotel to connect with more third-party tools, streamlining operations across multiple platforms. Its connectivity offers greater flexibility and future-proofing.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO’s ratings are not available, so no recent or comprehensive hotel reviews exist to gauge user satisfaction. HotelTime has a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its reliability and support.
In particular, properties like resorts and boutique hotels frequently praise HotelTime’s ease of use and operational improvements. Its large review volume and high ratings make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: HotelTime.
GODO’s exact pricing details are unavailable, implying a possible custom or enterprise pricing model. HotelTime charges a base price of $600/month, with no implementation or per-room fees mentioned.
While GODO’s cost may vary based on custom solutions, HotelTime’s transparent pricing offers better predictability and value, especially given its extensive features and support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that GODO is a niche, automation-driven PMS with a limited feature set, ideal for small, vacation-rental-focused properties. HotelTime, by contrast, is a comprehensive, scalable platform suitable for a broad range of hotel types and sizes.
If your hotel values extensive management tools, integrations, and proven support, HotelTime is the clear choice. Its large review base and recent positive feedback confirm its reliability and capacity to grow with your property.
Choose GODO if your focus is simple guest messaging and automation within a small portfolio. Opt for HotelTime if you seek a versatile, full-featured PMS with proven support and a strong market presence.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, GODO e HotelTime PMS compartilham 31 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| Comunicação com convidados (mensagens SMS) | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Faturamento direto | ||
| Mensagens centralizadas | ||
| Mensagens de convidados | ||
| Perfis de convidados | ||
| SRC integrado |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 11 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. GODO e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. GODO oferece 5 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
GODO: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. GODO tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos