The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
Analisamos 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros, comparamos funcionalidades, precos e estudos de caso reais para detalhar onde cada plataforma se destaca. A escolha certa depende do tipo e das prioridades da sua propriedade:
GRAND se destaca , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Guest Messaging.
HOTELTIME se destaca em ease of use and customer support — especialmente para propriedades brand (4.9/5) , com funcionalidades exclusivas como Payment processing and Guest CRM.
Avaliacoes lado a lado baseadas em 549 avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros no HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Probabilidade de Recomendar |
|
|
| Facilidade de Uso |
|
|
| Suporte ao Cliente |
|
|
| Custo-Beneficio |
|
|
| Preco Inicial | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
| Avaliacoes Verificadas | 0 | 549 |
Apos analisar 549 avaliacoes verificadas, os usuarios do GRAND mais valorizam , enquanto os usuarios do HOTELTIME destacam user interface and learning curve, suporte técnico, reporting and analytics. Clique em qualquer tema para ver o que os avaliadores dizem.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
Suporte técnico
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| Contras | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
Otimização para dispositivos móveis
▾
|
|
Como cada produto se classifica entre os fornecedores de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades para diferentes tamanhos, tipos e regioes de propriedades — com base em avaliacoes verificadas de hoteleiros em cada segmento.
Por Tamanho do Hotel
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Pequeno (10-24 quartos) ▾ | — | #5 219 avaliacoes |
| Medio (25-74 quartos) ▾ | — | #3 238 avaliacoes |
| Grande (75-199 quartos) ▾ | — | #2 46 avaliacoes |
| Extra Grande (200+ quartos) ▾ | — | #8 7 avaliacoes |
Por Tipo de Propriedade
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 239 avaliacoes |
| Luxo ▾ | — | #3 241 avaliacoes |
| Rede / Cadeia ▾ | — | #4 143 avaliacoes |
| Estadia Prolongada ▾ | — | #4 49 avaliacoes |
Por Regiao
| Segmento |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| America do Norte | — | #52 4 avaliacoes |
| Europa ▾ | — | #2 384 avaliacoes |
| Asia-Pacifico ▾ | — | #5 111 avaliacoes |
| Oriente Medio ▾ | — | #1 21 avaliacoes |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scale. Both products aim to streamline management tasks, improve guest experiences, and centralize operations, but they diverge sharply in features, user feedback, and market presence. With HOTELTIME boasting a significantly higher review count and more recent reviews, it clearly holds a stronger position in the current market. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
GRAND PMS and HotelTime PMS are both cloud-based property management systems designed to improve hotel operations. GRAND offers a single, intuitive platform that unifies bookings, housekeeping, billing, and reporting, with additional tools for event management and proposals. HotelTime, meanwhile, provides a broad suite of features, including reservations, spa and restaurant management, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for properties of all sizes. While GRAND’s interface emphasizes automation and simplicity, HotelTime’s strength lies in its extensive, feature-rich environment.
However, the critical difference is in their market credibility: HOTELTIME has over 430 reviews, with most recent feedback from the last six months, giving it a more current and comprehensive understanding of user experiences. GRAND’s lack of reviews makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance. Would you prefer a platform with proven market validation or a newer system with limited feedback?
If your hotel requires a flexible, feature-dense platform capable of handling complex operations across multiple departments and locations, HotelTime is the clear choice. It is suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, city hotels, and large groups, thanks to its extensive integrations and modules like POS, guest CRM, revenue management, and automation tools.
On the other hand, if your team prioritizes a straightforward, AI-powered interface that simplifies daily tasks and reduces manual work, GRAND could appeal — although the absence of user feedback makes this less certain. Hotels looking for proven reliability and broad functionality should lean toward HotelTime, especially given its larger, more recent review base.
HotelTime’s user interface scores a 4.66 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews highlighting its intuitive design, simple navigation, and quick onboarding. Support and onboarding ratings at 4.73 indicate your team will likely find it straightforward to adopt, with many users mentioning minimal training time and smooth implementation.
In contrast, GRAND’s review score for ease of use is 0, reflecting no data or user feedback. This lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess onboarding or user experience. Based on available data, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime boasts 38 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, integrated CRS, guest CRM, automated night audit, mobile app, revenue management, and online check-in. Its broader feature set allows for comprehensive management of hotel and venue operations, reducing the need for multiple systems.
GRAND offers only one feature exclusive to its platform: guest messaging, with the remaining 13 shared features. Its limited feature count suggests a narrower scope, potentially less suitable for complex, multi-department hotels. Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime consistently receives positive reviews about support, with a 4.73 out of 5 rating and comments like, “Support team is responsive and helpful,” and “Support staff are always on the other end of the phone.” Many users praise the onboarding process and continual assistance, which appears to enhance user confidence.
GRAND’s support ratings are at zero; no reviews or data are available to gauge support quality. Without recent customer feedback, the clear edge goes to HotelTime.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including popular systems like Profitroom, Bookboost, and STR, offering extensive customization options. Shared integrations are minimal, but the breadth of available partners supports robust hotel tech stacks.
GRAND has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other tools and systems. For hotels seeking a highly connected platform, Edge: HotelTime.
HotelTime’s overall rating of 4.83 out of 5, with 433 reviews, indicates strong satisfaction across multiple hotel segments. Recent reviews praise its flexibility, customer support, and features, with property types like resorts and city hotels rating it near perfect.
GRAND, with no reviews, cannot be rated by users. The clear choice based on user ratings and recent feedback is HotelTime.
GRAND’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $900, with no mention of freemium options or monthly plans. Conversely, HotelTime’s base price starts at $600, with similar no-trial, no-implementation fees.
Given the lack of detailed pricing for GRAND, HotelTime presents a more transparent and competitive model for hotels of various sizes.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Not recommended without more feedback on GRAND’s real-world performance.
Not ideal if...
Edge: Hotels that need a proven, feature-packed platform with broad support.
The core difference is in market presence and user feedback: HotelTime’s large, recent review base confirms its reliability and customer satisfaction, while GRAND remains largely untested in the field. If your hotel values a feature-rich, well-supported system, HotelTime’s extensive modules and integrations make it the stronger choice.
Choose GRAND if your hotel values simplicity, AI automation, and guest messaging, and if you’re willing to accept less proven performance. However, for most hotels seeking a dependable, full-featured platform, HotelTime provides a safer, more validated solution.
In conclusion, HotelTime’s broad features, proven support, and extensive integrations make it the preferred choice for hotels aiming for operational excellence. GRAND’s potential is evident, but without more recent reviews, its suitability remains uncertain. We recommend HotelTime for hotels prioritizing reliability and comprehensive management tools today.
Os precos de Sistemas de Gestão de Propriedades raramente sao simples. Aqui esta o que sabemos com base nos dados publicos de precos de cada fornecedor. Sempre solicite uma cotacao personalizada para o tamanho da sua propriedade.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $600/mo |
De acordo com o banco de dados de produtos do HTR, GRAND PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham 13 funcionalidades. Aqui estao as principais diferencas — funcionalidades que um tem e o outro nao.
| Funcionalidade |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Acompanhamento de receita auxiliar | ||
| CRM convidado | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Mensagens de convidados | ||
| Processo de pagamento | ||
| SRC integrado | ||
| Taxas personalizadas |
Mostrando as principais diferencas. 27 funcionalidades adicionais diferem entre esses produtos.
Analisamos 8 estudos de caso verificados para comparar o que os hoteis realmente alcancam com cada plataforma em quatro objetivos de negocio principais.
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
Nenhum estudo de caso publicado para este objetivo ainda.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
Capacidades exclusivas
O que os hoteleiros adoram
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para... Embora a presteza e a disponibilidade da equipe de suporte sejam apreciadas, algumas avaliações sugerem que um horário de atendimento mais amplo para o suporte técnico melhoraria ainda mais a experiência do usuário, garantindo assistência em todos os momentos, especialmente para usuários internacionais.
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
Onde os hoteleiros criticam
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
Capacidades exclusivas
Onde as avaliacoes mais divergem
Depende dos seus requisitos. GRAND PMS e HotelTime PMS compartilham muitas funcionalidades principais de Property Management Systems, mas cada um tem capacidades unicas. GRAND PMS oferece 0 parceiros de integracao verificados, enquanto HotelTime PMS oferece 58. Revise a comparacao de funcionalidades acima para ver onde eles diferem antes de migrar.
Hoteis pequenos devem priorizar facilidade de uso e onboarding rapido. HotelTime PMS lidera em facilidade de uso com 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Procure precos transparentes e opcao de teste ou demonstracao. Filtre as avaliacoes na pagina de cada produto por tamanho de propriedade para ouvir hoteis como o seu.
GRAND PMS: Nao. HotelTime PMS: Nao. Nenhum dos produtos oferece um plano gratuito atualmente. A maioria dos fornecedores de Property Management Systems oferece demonstracoes ou periodos de teste — solicite um de cada para avaliar antes de se comprometer.
O HT Score e um ranking composto que considera 4 grupos de criterios e mais de uma dezena de variaveis para ajudar hoteleiros a comparar objetivamente produtos de tecnologia hoteleira. GRAND tem um HT Score de 0 e HOTELTIME tem 92. Veja como a pontuacao e calculada.
| Grupo de Criterios | Peso | O Que Mede |
|---|---|---|
| Avaliacoes e Reviews de Clientes |
|
O quanto os usuarios recomendam este produto? Pontuacao de Avaliacoes, Volume de Reviews, Participacao de Mercado, Profundidade das Reviews, Recencia das Reviews, Casos de Sucesso ▾ O fator com maior peso. Analisa as avaliacoes medias de satisfacao (probabilidade de recomendar, facilidade de uso, suporte, ROI), contagem total de reviews em relacao aos pares da categoria, recencia das reviews (pelo menos 20 reviews nos ultimos 6 meses) e participacao de mercado entre clientes hoteleiros unicos para detectar vies de selecao. |
| Ecossistema de Parceiros |
|
O quanto os parceiros de tecnologia recomendam esta empresa? Recomendacoes de Parceiros, Quantidade de Integracoes, Qualidade das Integracoes ▾ Avalia recomendacoes de parceiros como votos de confianca de especialistas, o numero de integracoes verificadas e a qualidade do ecossistema — a media dos HT Scores dos parceiros de integracao. Produtos com ecossistemas de integracao de maior qualidade tem mais chances de entregar uma stack tecnologica conectada. |
| Foco no Cliente |
|
Qual o nivel de foco no cliente desta organizacao? Suporte Certificado, Consistencia de Reviews, Completude do Perfil ▾ Avalia se a empresa obteve a Certificacao de Suporte ao Cliente do HTR, mantem coleta consistente de reviews ao longo do tempo (um indicador de cultura orientada por feedback) e mantem perfis de produtos completos com capacidades, capturas de tela, precos e funcionalidades. |
| Alcance, Solidez e Recursos |
|
Qual a extensao do alcance e dos recursos desta empresa? Alcance Geografico, Solidez, Recursos da Empresa, Pontuacao de Tendencia ▾ Mede a presenca global (paises e regioes atendidos), anos de operacao como indicador de estabilidade, tamanho da equipe como indicador de recursos e uma pontuacao de tendencia baseada em consultas de compradores, reviews, recomendacoes de parceiros e atividade na imprensa dos ultimos doze meses. |
As avaliacoes e reviews de clientes sao, de longe, o fator mais importante no algoritmo do HT Score. O HTR nao aceita pagamento por rankings mais altos. Todas as reviews sao verificadas — apenas profissionais do setor hoteleiro com afiliacoes confirmadas podem enviar avaliacoes. Ver metodologia completa do HT Score →
Consultor de recomendações de produtos